Going Native: Effects of Disclosure Position and Language on the Recognition and Evaluation of Online Native Advertising

Despite recent industry attention, questions remain about how native advertising is perceived and processed by consumers. Two experiments examined effects of language and positioning in native advertising disclosures on recognition of the content as advertising, effects of recognition on brand and publisher evaluations, and whether disclosure position affects visual attention. Findings show that middle or bottom positioning and wording using “advertising” or “sponsored” increased advertising recognition compared to other conditions, and ad recognition generally led to more negative evaluations. Visual attention mediated the relationship between disclosure position and advertising recognition. Theoretical, practical, and regulatory implications for disclosures in native advertising are discussed.

[1]  D. Firth.  Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates , 1993 .

[2]  Peter Wright,et al.  Persuasion Knowledge , 2022 .

[3]  L. Bogart.  Commercial Culture: The Media System and the Public Interest , 1995 .

[4]  Jan Panero Benway,et al.  Banner Blindness: The Irony of Attention Grabbing on the World Wide Web , 1998 .

[5]  Pete Faraday,et al.  Visually Critiquing Web Pages , 1999, Eurographics Multimedia Workshop.

[6]  Y. Pasadeos,et al.  On the Deceptive Effectiveness of Labeled and Unlabeled Advertorial Formats , 2001 .

[7]  M. Schemper,et al.  A solution to the problem of separation in logistic regression , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[8]  Joseph H. Goldberg,et al.  Eye tracking in web search tasks: design implications , 2002, ETRA.

[9]  Karen L. Becker-Olsen.  And Now, A Word from Our Sponsor--A Look at the Effects of Sponsored Content and Banner Advertising , 2003 .

[10]  M. E. Peebles.  And now, a word from our sponsor. , 2003, Harvard business review.

[11]  M. Hoy,et al.  Adherence of Prime-Time Televised Advertising Disclosures to the “Clear and Conspicuous” Standard: 1990 versus 2002 , 2004 .

[12]  Chang-Hoan Cho,et al.  WHY DO PEOPLE AVOID ADVERTISING ON THE INTERNET? , 2004 .

[13]  J. Nielsen.  F-shaped pattern for reading Web content, Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox , 2006 .

[14]  Barbara S. Chaparro,et al.  Where's the Search? Re-examining User Expectations of Web Objects , 2006 .

[15]  Barbara S. Chaparro,et al.  Eye Gaze Patterns while Searching vs. Browsing a Website , 2007 .

[16]  M. Hoy,et al.  An International Perspective of Online Disclosure Presentation: A Comparison of Banner Ad Disclosures from United States, United Kingdom, and Singapore Web Sites , 2008 .

[17]  Michelle Renee Nelson,et al.  Increased Persuasion Knowledge of Video News Releases: Audience Beliefs About News and Support for Source Disclosure , 2009 .

[18]  P. Valkenburg,et al.  Comparing Children's and Adults' Cognitive Advertising Competences in the Netherlands , 2010 .

[19]  Eva A. van Reijmersdal,et al.  Introducing the PCMC Model: An Investigative Framework for Young People's Processing of Commercialized Media Content , 2010 .

[20]  Klaus Opwis,et al.  Mental models for web objects: Where do users expect to find the most frequent objects in online shops, news portals, and company web pages? , 2010, Interact. Comput..

[21]  Moniek Buijzen,et al.  Reconsidering Advertising Literacy as a Defense Against Advertising Effects , 2011 .

[22]  Dawn Iacobucci,et al.  Methods Dialogue Mediation analysis and categorical variables: The final frontier ☆ , 2012 .

[23]  David P Mackinnon,et al.  Commentary on "Mediation Analysis and Categorical Variables: The Final Frontier" by Dawn Iacobucci. , 2012, Journal of consumer psychology : the official journal of the Society for Consumer Psychology.

[24]  Eva A van Reijmersdal,et al.  Effects of online advertising format and persuasion knowledge on audience reactions , 2012 .

[25]  Tina M. Lowrey,et al.  Persuasion in the Marketplace: How Theories of Persuasion Apply to Marketing and Advertising , 2012 .

[26]  S. C. Boerman,et al.  Sponsorship Disclosure: Effects of Duration on Persuasion Knowledge and Brand Responses , 2012 .

[27]  Oleg Špakov,et al.  The Effect of Different Text Presentation Formats on Eye Movement Metrics in Reading , 2012 .

[28]  Peeter W. J. Verlegh,et al.  Can Disclosures Lead Consumers to Resist Covert Persuasion? The Important Roles of Disclosure Timing and Type of Response , 2012 .

[29]  Christian Purucker,et al.  Clustered insights Improving eye tracking data analysis using scan statistics , 2013 .

[30]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Mediation with Dichotomous Outcomes , 2013 .

[31]  Tae-Yang Kim,et al.  User Experience(UX) of Facebook: Focusing on Users` Eye Movement Pattern and Advertising Contents , 2014 .

[32]  S. C. Boerman,et al.  Effects of sponsorship disclosure timing on the processing of sponsored content: a study on the effectiveness of European disclosure regulations , 2014 .

[33]  Eugene Agichtein,et al.  Effects of task and domain on searcher attention , 2014, SIGIR.

[34]  Matt Carlson.  When news sites go native: Redefining the advertising–editorial divide in response to native advertising , 2015 .

[35]  S. C. Boerman,et al.  Using Eye Tracking to Understand the Effects of Brand Placement Disclosure Types in Television Programs , 2015 .

[36]  Thierry Baccino,et al.  Rapid serial visual presentation in reading: The case of Spritz , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..