Establishment of a single-step hybridoma cloning protocol using an automated cell transfer system: comparison with limiting dilution.

An easy-to-standardize single-step protocol of hybridoma cloning has been established using a recently introduced, commercially available cell transfer system. By controlling the volume of air within a sealed glass micropipette by means of a Peltier device, single cells are gently collected or ejected. The transfer of cells from a source dish to the wells of a target microplate is controlled by a microprocessor. Since collection as well as expulsion of cells is done under microscopic control seeding of single cells can be guaranteed. Monoclonality is therefore reproducibly achieved in a single step, reducing the time required for cloning enormously, and conserving man-power and material. Since the automated transfer of cells is time-saving and easy-to-standardize, it substantially facilitates cloning of hybridoma. The present protocol therefore represents an alternative to limiting-dilution cloning as well as to other previously introduced techniques of single-cell cloning. It is easily adapted to a wide spectrum of other cell types and can therefore be used in many other applications involving single cell manipulation.

[1]  M. Rittenberg,et al.  In vitro antibody synthesis in 20 μl hanging drops: Initiation of secondary responses and a simple method of cloning hybridomas , 1983 .

[2]  Analysis of AMPA receptor subunits expressed by single Purkinje cells using RNA polymerase chain reaction. , 1993, Biochemical Society transactions.

[3]  D. Hough,et al.  The efficient production of stable, human monoclonal antibody-secreting hybridomas from EBV-transformed lymphocytes using the mouse myeloma X63-Ag8.653 as a fusion partner. , 1986, Journal of immunological methods.

[4]  K. Black,et al.  A rapid and sensitive cellular enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay (CELISA) for the detection and quantitation of antibodies against cell surface determinants. I. A comparison of cell fixation and storage techniques. , 1992, Journal of immunological methods.

[5]  K. Unsicker,et al.  A statistical approach to determine monoclonality after limiting cell plating of a hybridoma clone. , 1985, Journal of immunological methods.

[6]  J. Liddell,et al.  A Practical Guide to Monoclonal Antibodies , 1991 .

[7]  P. Underwood,et al.  Hazards of the limiting-dilution method of cloning hybridomas. , 1988, Journal of immunological methods.

[8]  K. Unsicker,et al.  Stimulation of neuron survival by basic FGF and CNTF is a direct effect and not mediated by non-neuronal cells: evidence from single cell cultures. , 1992, Brain research. Developmental brain research.

[9]  J. Dangl,et al.  Selection of hybridomas and hybridoma variants using the fluorescence activated cell sorter. , 1982, Journal of immunological methods.

[10]  J. Davis,et al.  A simple, single-step technique for selecting and cloning hybridomas for the production of monoclonal antibodies. , 1982, Journal of immunological methods.

[11]  K. McCullough,et al.  Hybridoma cell lines secreting monoclonal antibodies against foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV). II. Cloning conditions. , 1983, Journal of biological standardization.

[12]  K. Unsicker,et al.  Cell blotting and isoelectric focusing of neuroblastoma‐derived heparin‐binding neurotrophic activities: Detection of basic fibroblast growth factor protein and mRNA , 1993, Journal of neuroscience research.

[13]  A. Sandrock,et al.  Cyclophosphamide treatment used to manipulate the immune response for the production of monoclonal antibodies. , 1987, Journal of immunological methods.

[14]  C. Milstein,et al.  Somatic mutation and the origin of antibody diversity. Clonal variability of the immunoglobulin produced by MOPC 21 cells in culture , 1973 .

[15]  C. Milstein,et al.  Fusion between immunoglobulin‐secreting and nonsecreting myeloma cell lines , 1976, European journal of immunology.