Comparative genomic hybridisation array and DNA sequencing to direct treatment of metastatic breast cancer: a multicentre, prospective trial (SAFIR01/UNICANCER).

BACKGROUND Breast cancer is characterised by genomic alterations. We did a multicentre molecular screening study to identify abnormalities in individual patients with the aim of providing targeted therapy matched to individuals' genomic alterations. METHODS From June 16, 2011, to July 30, 2012, we recruited patients who had breast cancer with a metastasis accessible for biopsy in 18 centres in France. Comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH) array and Sanger sequencing on PIK3CA (exon 10 and 21) and AKT1 (exon 4) were used to assess metastatic biopsy samples in five centres. Therapeutic targets were decided on the basis of identified genomic alterations. The primary objective was to include 30% of patients in clinical trials testing a targeted therapy and, therefore, the primary outcome was the proportion of patients to whom a targeted therapy could be offered. For the primary endpoint, the analyses were done on the overall population registered for the trial. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01414933. FINDINGS 423 patients were included, and biopsy samples were obtained from 407 (metastatic breast cancer was not found in four). CGH array and Sanger sequencing were feasible in 283 (67%) and 297 (70%) patients, respectively. A targetable genomic alteration was identified in 195 (46%) patients, most frequently in PIK3CA (74 [25%] of 297 identified genomic alterations), CCND1 (53 [19%]), and FGFR1 (36 [13%]). 117 (39%) of 297 patients with genomic tests available presented with rare genomic alterations (defined as occurring in less than 5% of the general population), including AKT1 mutations, and EGFR, MDM2, FGFR2, AKT2, IGF1R, and MET high-level amplifications. Therapy could be personalised in 55 (13%) of 423 patients. Of the 43 patients who were assessable and received targeted therapy, four (9%) had an objective response, and nine others (21%) had stable disease for more than 16 weeks. Serious (grade 3 or higher) adverse events related to biopsy were reported in four (1%) of enrolled patients, including pneumothorax (grade 3, one patient), pain (grade 3, one patient), haematoma (grade 3, one patient), and haemorrhagic shock (grade 3, one patient). INTERPRETATION Personalisation of medicine for metastatic breast cancer is feasible, including for rare genomic alterations. FUNDING French National Cancer Institute, Breast Cancer Research Foundation, Odyssea, Operation Parrains Chercheurs.

[1]  Yuan Jiang,et al.  A probe-density-based analysis method for array CGH data: simulation, normalization and centralization , 2008, Bioinform..

[2]  Michael Bittner,et al.  Pilot study using molecular profiling of patients' tumors to find potential targets and select treatments for their refractory cancers. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  I. Ray-Coquard,et al.  Randomized phase II trial of everolimus in combination with tamoxifen in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer with prior exposure to aromatase inhibitors: a GINECO study. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  J. T. Thigpen Eribulin monotherapy versus treatment of physician's choice in patients with metastatic breast cancer (EMBRACE): a phase 3 open-label randomised study , 2011 .

[5]  A. Børresen-Dale,et al.  The landscape of cancer genes and mutational processes in breast cancer , 2012, Nature.

[6]  E. S. Venkatraman,et al.  A faster circular binary segmentation algorithm for the analysis of array CGH data , 2007, Bioinform..

[7]  Eric Sauerbrei,et al.  Randomized phase II study comparing two schedules of everolimus in patients with recurrent/metastatic breast cancer: NCIC Clinical Trials Group IND.163. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  Thomas Bachelot,et al.  Targeting FGFR with Dovitinib (TKI258): Preclinical and Clinical Data in Breast Cancer , 2013, Clinical Cancer Research.

[9]  T. Fleming,et al.  Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  Suzanne F. Jones,et al.  A Phase Ib Study of the Akt Inhibitor GDC-0068 with Docetaxel or mFOLFOX6 in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors 3021 , 2012 .

[11]  R. Arceci Intratumor Heterogeneity and Branched Evolution Revealed by Multiregion Sequencing , 2012 .

[12]  A. Joe,et al.  Oncogene addiction. , 2008, Cancer research.

[13]  J. Baselga,et al.  Dual mTORC1/2 and HER2 Blockade Results in Antitumor Activity in Preclinical Models of Breast Cancer Resistant to Anti-HER2 Therapy , 2012, Clinical Cancer Research.

[14]  F. Markowetz,et al.  The genomic and transcriptomic architecture of 2,000 breast tumours reveals novel subgroups , 2012, Nature.

[15]  G. Jayson,et al.  Abstract B153: A phase I study evaluating the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) activity of the dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor GDC-0980 administered once weekly (QW). , 2011 .

[16]  R. Simon,et al.  Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. , 1989, Controlled clinical trials.

[17]  Nikhil Wagle,et al.  High-throughput detection of actionable genomic alterations in clinical tumor samples by targeted, massively parallel sequencing. , 2012, Cancer discovery.

[18]  Adam A. Margolin,et al.  The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia enables predictive modeling of anticancer drug sensitivity , 2012, Nature.

[19]  F. André,et al.  Biology-driven phase II trials: what is the optimal model for molecular selection? , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  A. Jemal,et al.  Breast Cancer Statistics , 2013 .

[21]  M. Mathieu,et al.  Array CGH and PIK3CA/AKT1 mutations to drive patients to specific targeted agents: a clinical experience in 108 patients with metastatic breast cancer. , 2012, European journal of cancer.

[22]  Spyro Mousses,et al.  A transforming mutation in the pleckstrin homology domain of AKT1 in cancer , 2007, Nature.

[23]  Anthony Rhodes,et al.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. , 2007, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.