Double-conditioning regimen with thiotepa and melphalan for high-risk Neuroblastoma

Appropriate high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) for high-risk neuroblastoma has not yet been established. In Japan, a unique HDC regimen (called double-conditioning regimen) comprising two cycles of total 800 mg/m2 of thiotepa and total 280 mg/m2 of melphalan is widely used. To re-evaluate the safety and the efficacy of this regimen for high-risk neuroblastoma, the medical records of 41 patients with high-risk neuroblastoma who underwent the double-conditioning regimen followed by autologous peripheral blood stem cell rescue between 2002 and 2012 were reviewed. MYCN-amplified high-risk neuroblastomas were observed in 23 patients. All patients underwent intensive multidrug induction chemotherapy, but none underwent anti-GD2 antibody immunotherapy. The primary tumor was resected at the adequate time point. The median follow-up duration for living patients was 9.2 years (range = 5.5–14.0 years). The 5-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) rates from treatment initiation were 41.5% ± 7.7% and 56.1% ± 7.8%, respectively. The 5-year EFS of MYCN-amplified high-risk neuroblastoma patients was 60.9% ± 10.2%, which was significantly superior compared to MYCN-non-amplified high-risk neuroblastoma patients (16.7% ± 8.8%; P < 0.001). MYCN amplification was the most favorable prognostic factor for EFS (hazard ratio = 0.29; 95% confidence interval = 0.12–0.66). Of the 41 patients, 3 died because of regimen-related toxicity (infection, n = 2; microangiopathy, n = 1). The double-conditioning regimen with thiotepa and melphalan is effective for high-risk neuroblastoma, especially in patients with MYCN amplification. However, the double-conditioning regimen is toxic and warrants special attention in clinical practice.

[1]  K. Yamasaki,et al.  Strategy to minimize radiation burden in infants and high‐risk medulloblastoma using intrathecal methotrexate and high‐dose chemotherapy: A prospective registry study in Japan , 2020, Pediatric blood & cancer.

[2]  K. Yamasaki,et al.  Double‐conditioning regimen consisting of high‐dose thiotepa and melphalan with autologous stem cell rescue for high‐risk pediatric solid tumors: A second report , 2019, Pediatric blood & cancer.

[3]  A. Naranjo,et al.  Effect of Tandem Autologous Stem Cell Transplant vs Single Transplant on Event-Free Survival in Patients With High-Risk Neuroblastoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2019, JAMA.

[4]  N. Maeda,et al.  Pharmacokinetics of thiotepa in high-dose regimens for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant in Japanese patients with pediatric tumors or adult lymphoma , 2019, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[5]  Ruth Ladenstein,et al.  Risk stratification of high‐risk metastatic neuroblastoma: A report from the HR‐NBL‐1/SIOPEN study , 2018, Pediatric blood & cancer.

[6]  M. Ohira,et al.  Results of a phase II trial for high-risk neuroblastoma treatment protocol JN-H-07: a report from the Japan Childhood Cancer Group Neuroblastoma Committee (JNBSG) , 2018, International Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  Günter Schreier,et al.  Busulfan and melphalan versus carboplatin, etoposide, and melphalan as high-dose chemotherapy for high-risk neuroblastoma (HR-NBL1/SIOPEN): an international, randomised, multi-arm, open-label, phase 3 trial. , 2017, The Lancet. Oncology.

[8]  K. Matthay,et al.  Prognostic significance of pattern and burden of metastatic disease in patients with stage 4 neuroblastoma: A study from the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group database. , 2016, European journal of cancer.

[9]  B. Yalçın,et al.  High-dose chemotherapy and autologous haematopoietic stem cell rescue for children with high-risk neuroblastoma. , 2015, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[10]  N. Cheung,et al.  Striking dichotomy in outcome of MYCN‐amplified neuroblastoma in the contemporary era , 2014, Cancer.

[11]  A. Naranjo,et al.  A Pilot Study of Tandem High Dose Chemotherapy with Stem Cell Rescue as Consolidation for High Risk Neuroblastoma: Children’s Oncology Group study ANBL00P1 , 2012, Bone Marrow Transplantation.

[12]  Helen X. Chen,et al.  Anti-GD2 antibody with GM-CSF, interleukin-2, and isotretinoin for neuroblastoma. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  K. Matthay,et al.  Long-term results for children with high-risk neuroblastoma treated on a randomized trial of myeloablative therapy followed by 13-cis-retinoic acid: a children's oncology group study. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  Barbara Hero,et al.  The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) classification system: an INRG Task Force report. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  M. Fukuzawa,et al.  A CASE SERIES OF CHILDREN WITH HIGH-RISK METASTATIC NEUROBLASTOMA TREATED WITH A NOVEL TREATMENT STRATEGY CONSISTING OF POSTPONED PRIMARY SURGERY UNTIL THE END OF SYSTEMIC CHEMOTHERAPY INCLUDING HIGH-DOSE CHEMOTHERAPY , 2008, Pediatric hematology and oncology.

[16]  F. Berthold,et al.  Topotecan, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide (TCE) in the treatment of high-risk neuroblastoma. Results of a phase-II trial , 2007, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.

[17]  K. Kramer,et al.  Topotecan, thiotepa, and carboplatin for neuroblastoma: failure to prevent relapse in the central nervous system , 2006, Bone Marrow Transplantation.

[18]  F. Berthold,et al.  Myeloablative megatherapy with autologous stem-cell rescue versus oral maintenance chemotherapy as consolidation treatment in patients with high-risk neuroblastoma: a randomised controlled trial. , 2005, The Lancet. Oncology.

[19]  R. Soiffer,et al.  Blood and marrow transplant clinical trials network toxicity committee consensus summary: thrombotic microangiopathy after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. , 2005, Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

[20]  K. Kawa,et al.  Intensified Chemotherapy Increases the Survival Rates in Patients With Stage 4 Neuroblastoma With MYCN Amplification , 2002, Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology.

[21]  A. Rademaker,et al.  Treatment of high-risk neuroblastoma with triple-tandem high-dose therapy and stem-cell rescue: results of the Chicago Pilot II Study. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  M. Fukuzawa,et al.  Double-conditioning regimens consisting of thiotepa, melphalan and busulfan with stem cell rescue for the treatment of pediatric solid tumors , 1998, Bone Marrow Transplantation.

[23]  F. Berthold,et al.  Revisions of the international criteria for neuroblastoma diagnosis, staging and response to treatment. , 1993, Progress in clinical and biological research.

[24]  L. Grochow,et al.  VENOOCCLUSIVE DISEASE OF THE LIVER FOLLOWING BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION , 1987, Transplantation.

[25]  H. Koo,et al.  Tandem high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with high-risk neuroblastoma: Results of SMC NB-2004 study , 2013, Bone Marrow Transplantation.

[26]  R. Arceci The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) Classification System: An INRG Task Force Report , 2009 .