Bioinspired self-repairing slippery surfaces with pressure-stable omniphobicity

Creating a robust synthetic surface that repels various liquids would have broad technological implications for areas ranging from biomedical devices and fuel transport to architecture but has proved extremely challenging. Inspirations from natural nonwetting structures, particularly the leaves of the lotus, have led to the development of liquid-repellent microtextured surfaces that rely on the formation of a stable air–liquid interface. Despite over a decade of intense research, these surfaces are, however, still plagued with problems that restrict their practical applications: limited oleophobicity with high contact angle hysteresis, failure under pressure and upon physical damage, inability to self-heal and high production cost. To address these challenges, here we report a strategy to create self-healing, slippery liquid-infused porous surface(s) (SLIPS) with exceptional liquid- and ice-repellency, pressure stability and enhanced optical transparency. Our approach—inspired by Nepenthes pitcher plants—is conceptually different from the lotus effect, because we use nano/microstructured substrates to lock in place the infused lubricating fluid. We define the requirements for which the lubricant forms a stable, defect-free and inert ‘slippery’ interface. This surface outperforms its natural counterparts and state-of-the-art synthetic liquid-repellent surfaces in its capability to repel various simple and complex liquids (water, hydrocarbons, crude oil and blood), maintain low contact angle hysteresis (<2.5°), quickly restore liquid-repellency after physical damage (within 0.1–1 s), resist ice adhesion, and function at high pressures (up to about 680 atm). We show that these properties are insensitive to the precise geometry of the underlying substrate, making our approach applicable to various inexpensive, low-surface-energy structured materials (such as porous Teflon membrane). We envision that these slippery surfaces will be useful in fluid handling and transportation, optical sensing, medicine, and as self-cleaning and anti-fouling materials operating in extreme environments.

[1]  R. N. Wenzel RESISTANCE OF SOLID SURFACES TO WETTING BY WATER , 1936 .

[2]  A. Cassie,et al.  Wettability of porous surfaces , 1944 .

[3]  A. Cassie,et al.  Large Contact Angles of Plant and Animal Surfaces , 1945, Nature.

[4]  W. Zisman,et al.  CONSTITUTIVE RELATIONS IN THE WETTING OF LOW ENERGY SURFACES AND THE THEORY OF THE RETRACTION METHOD OF PREPARING MONOLAYERS1 , 1960 .

[5]  C. Furmidge,et al.  Studies at phase interfaces. I. The sliding of liquid drops on solid surfaces and a theory for spray retention , 1962 .

[6]  R. E. Ford,et al.  Studies at phase interfaces , 1966 .

[7]  W. Barthlott,et al.  Purity of the sacred lotus, or escape from contamination in biological surfaces , 1997, Planta.

[8]  Akira Fujishima,et al.  Preparation of Transparent Superhydrophobic Boehmite and Silica Films by Sublimation of Aluminum Acetylacetonate , 1999 .

[9]  Wei Chen,et al.  Ultrahydrophobic and Ultralyophobic Surfaces: Some Comments and Examples , 1999 .

[10]  R. Full,et al.  An Integrative Study of Insect Adhesion: Mechanics and Wet Adhesion of Pretarsal Pads in Ants1 , 2002, Integrative and comparative biology.

[11]  B. Widom Capillarity and Wetting Phenomena: Drops, Bubbles, Pearls, Waves , 2003 .

[12]  Xuefeng Gao,et al.  Biophysics: Water-repellent legs of water striders , 2004, Nature.

[13]  Walter Federle,et al.  Insect aquaplaning: Nepenthes pitcher plants capture prey with the peristome, a fully wettable water-lubricated anisotropic surface. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  K. Autumn,et al.  Evidence for self-cleaning in gecko setae. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  David Quéré,et al.  Non-sticking drops , 2005 .

[16]  R. Cerbino Capillarity and Wetting Phenomena: Drops, Bubbles, Pearls, Waves , 2006 .

[17]  Lei Jiang,et al.  The Dry‐Style Antifogging Properties of Mosquito Compound Eyes and Artificial Analogues Prepared by Soft Lithography , 2007 .

[18]  Gareth H. McKinley,et al.  Designing Superoleophobic Surfaces , 2007, Science.

[19]  E. Reyssat,et al.  Wicking within forests of micropillars , 2007 .

[20]  Marcus L. Roper,et al.  Imbibition by polygonal spreading on microdecorated surfaces. , 2007, Nature materials.

[21]  T. Salamon,et al.  Nanonails: a simple geometrical approach to electrically tunable superlyophobic surfaces. , 2008, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[22]  Gareth H McKinley,et al.  Robust omniphobic surfaces , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  David Qu,et al.  Wetting and Roughness , 2008 .

[24]  Alexander K. Epstein,et al.  Fabrication of Bioinspired Actuated Nanostructures with Arbitrary Geometry and Stiffness , 2009 .

[25]  W. Federle,et al.  The insect-trapping rim of Nepenthes pitchers , 2009, Plant signaling & behavior.

[26]  Alexander K. Epstein,et al.  Bacterial biofilm shows persistent resistance to liquid wetting and gas penetration , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Yang Li,et al.  Bioinspired self-healing superhydrophobic coatings. , 2010, Angewandte Chemie.

[28]  Ullrich Steiner,et al.  Metastable underwater superhydrophobicity. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[29]  Y. Coffinier,et al.  Quantitative testing of robustness on superomniphobic surfaces by drop impact. , 2010, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[30]  M. Monthioux,et al.  Contact angle hysteresis at the nanometer scale. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[31]  Chang-Jin Kim,et al.  Underwater restoration and retention of gases on superhydrophobic surfaces for drag reduction. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[32]  Eric Lauga,et al.  A smooth future? , 2011, Nature materials.