Mechanical loading on the low back in three methods of refuse collecting.

The mechanical loading on the low back was studied in three different current methods of refuse collecting: in polythene bags, two-wheeled mini-containers and large four-wheeled containers. To this end the most prominent activities of each collecting method were performed in a laboratory. On the basis of movement analysis, force measurements and biomechanical modelling, spinal compressive and shear forces were estimated. From these forces and from the frequency of activities during the working day (assessed in a preliminary field study) the low-back stress in each collecting method was evaluated. In the bag-method, peak forces when throwing the bags ranged from 3341 to 5179 N (average compression) and from 284 to 673 N (shear) among the different conditions studied. The act of picking up bags also showed rather high forces (exceeding the NIOSH limit for disc compression in most cases). The frequency of exposure to these forces in the field is rather high (workers pick up and throw on average 807 times each day). The mini-container method compares favourably to the bags method. Peak compressive and shear force in tilting/pushing and pulling mini-containers ranged from 1657 to 2654 N and from 123 to 248 N respectively. Also, the frequency of stressful events in the field is lower in this method. In the large container method extremely high peak forces (e.g. compression ranged from 4991 to 5810 N) were observed in the task of putting the empty container back from street level to sidewalk level (surmounting the kerb). The frequency of activities like pushing, pulling and lifting the large container in the field is much lower compared with activities in the other methods. On the basis of the frequency and magnitude of spinal forces it was concluded that the mini-containers should be preferred to the bags. If kerbs are removed at container places and tasks are performed by two instead of a single person, the large container method would form another good alternative to the stressful task of collecting refuse in bags.

[1]  Herbert Elftman,et al.  FORCES AND ENERGY CHANGES IN THE LEG DURING WALKING , 1939 .

[2]  D. Winter.  Biomechanics of Human Movement , 1980 .

[3]  W Laurig,et al.  The load on the spine during the transport of dustbins. , 1984, Applied ergonomics.

[4]  A Garg,et al.  Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. , 1993, Ergonomics.

[5]  Y. K. Liu,et al.  Torsional Fatigue of the Lumbar Intervertebral Joints , 1985, Spine.

[6]  T. Haher,et al.  The Contribution of the Three Columns of the Spine to Rotational Stability: A Biomechanical Model , 1989, Spine.

[7]  F. Hartmann,et al.  Biomechanical behavior of human intervertebral discs subjected to long lasting axial loading. , 1984, Biorheology.

[8]  J H van Dieën,et al.  Spinal shrinkage as a parameter of functional load. , 1993, Spine.

[9]  S. Kumar,et al.  Cumulative Load as a Risk Factor for Back Pain , 1990, Spine.

[10]  D. Chaffin.  Manual materials handling and the biomechanical basis for prevention of low-back pain in industry--an overview. , 1987, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[11]  J J Knibbe,et al.  The physical and physiological workload of refuse collectors. , 1990, Ergonomics.

[12]  van J. Dieen.  Functional load of the low back , 1993 .

[13]  R W Norman,et al.  Reassessment of the role of intra-abdominal pressure in spinal compression. , 1987, Ergonomics.

[14]  M. M. Ayoub,et al.  Effects of Operator Stance on Pushing and Pulling Tasks , 1974 .

[15]  A. Schultz,et al.  Valsalva Maneuver Biomechanics: Effects on Lumbar Trunk Loads of Elevated Intraabdominal Pressures , 1986, Spine.

[16]  M Magnusson,et al.  The Loads on the Lumbar Spine during Work at an Assembly Line: The Risks for Fatigue Injuries of Vertebral Bodies , 1990, Spine.

[17]  P. Brinckmann,et al.  Fatigue fracture of human lumbar vertebrae. , 1988, Clinical biomechanics.

[18]  D B Chaffin,et al.  A longitudinal study of low-back pain as associated with occupational weight lifting factors. , 1973, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[19]  M. de Looze,et al.  Validation of a dynamic linked segment model to calculate joint moments in lifting. , 1992, Clinical biomechanics.

[20]  Han C. G. Kemper,et al.  The daily work load of refuse collectors working with three different collecting methods: a field study , 1995 .

[21]  D G Wilder,et al.  Epidemiologic Studies of Low-Back Pain , 1980, Spine.

[22]  J H van Dieën,et al.  Coordination of the leg muscles in backlift and leglift. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  G. Andersson.  Epidemiologic Aspects on Low-Back Pain in Industry , 1981, Spine.