Nested DNA inversion as a paradigm of programmed gene rearrangement.

Programmed gene rearrangements are employed by a variety of microorganisms, including viruses, prokaryotes, and simple eukaryotes, to control gene expression. In most instances in which organisms mediate host evasion by large families of homologous gene cassettes, the mechanism of variation is not thought to involve DNA inversion. Here we report that Campylobacter fetus, a pathogenic Gram-negative bacterium, reassorts a single promoter, controlling surface-layer protein expression, and one or more complete ORFs strictly by DNA inversion. Rearrangements were independent of the distance between sites of inversion. These rearrangements permit variation in protein expression from the large surface-layer protein gene family and suggest an expanding paradigm of programmed DNA rearrangements among microorganisms.

[1]  D. Taylor,et al.  Differentiation of the subspecies of Campylobacter fetus by genomic sizing. , 1992, International journal of systematic bacteriology.

[2]  D. Greaves,et al.  Programmed gene rearrangements altering gene expression. , 1987, Science.

[3]  M. Blaser,et al.  Characterization of the Campylobacter fetus sapA promoter: evidence that the sapA promoter is deleted in spontaneous mutant strains , 1992, Journal of bacteriology.

[4]  M. Blaser,et al.  Shift in S-layer protein expression responsible for antigenic variation in Campylobacter fetus , 1993, Journal of bacteriology.

[5]  M. Blaser,et al.  Generation of Campylobacter fetus S‐layer protein diversity utilizes a single promoter on an invertible DNA segment , 1996, Molecular microbiology.

[6]  R. Plasterk,et al.  G inversion in bacteriophage Mu: a novel way of gene splicing , 1982, Nature.

[7]  M. Blaser,et al.  A lipopolysaccharide-binding domain of the Campylobacter fetus S-layer protein resides within the conserved N terminus of a family of silent and divergent homologs , 1995, Journal of bacteriology.

[8]  G. Schoolnik,et al.  Pilin-gene phase variation of Moraxella bovis is caused by an inversion of the pilin genes , 1988, Journal of bacteriology.

[9]  P. van de Putte,et al.  DNA inversions in phages and bacteria. , 1992, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[10]  M. Blaser,et al.  Segmental Conservation of sapA Sequences in Type B Campylobacter fetus Cells (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[11]  P. Trieu-Cuot,et al.  In vivo transfer of genetic information between gram‐positive and gram‐negative bacteria. , 1985, The EMBO journal.

[12]  A. Winter,et al.  Microcapsule of Campylobacter fetus: chemical and physical characterization , 1978, Infection and immunity.

[13]  M. Simon,et al.  Phase variation in Salmonella: genetic analysis of a recombinational switch. , 1979, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  M. Blaser,et al.  Protein shift and antigenic variation in the S-layer of Campylobacter fetus subsp. venerealis during bovine infection accompanied by genomic rearrangement of sapA homologs , 1995, Journal of bacteriology.

[15]  A. Feinberg,et al.  A technique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity. , 1983, Analytical biochemistry.

[16]  H. Birnboim,et al.  A rapid alkaline extraction procedure for screening recombinant plasmid DNA. , 1979, Nucleic acids research.

[17]  M. Blaser,et al.  High‐frequency S‐layer protein variation in Campylobacter fetus revealed by sapA mutagenesis , 1994, Molecular microbiology.

[18]  M. Gellert,et al.  Communication between segments of DNA during site-specific recombination , 1987, Nature.

[19]  M. Blaser,et al.  Susceptibility of Campylobacter isolates to the bactericidal activity of human serum. , 1985, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[20]  K. Dybvig,et al.  Mechanism of antigenic variation in Mycoplasma pulmonis: interwoven, site‐specific DNA inversions , 1995, Molecular microbiology.

[21]  M. Blaser,et al.  Surface array protein of Campylobacter fetus. Cloning and gene structure. , 1990, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[22]  M. Blaser,et al.  Correlation between molecular size of the surface array protein and morphology and antigenicity of the Campylobacter fetus S layer , 1991, Infection and immunity.

[23]  S. Iida,et al.  A site‐specific, conservative recombination system carried by bacteriophage P1. Mapping the recombinase gene cin and the cross‐over sites cix for the inversion of the C segment. , 1982, The EMBO journal.

[24]  M. Blaser,et al.  Pathogenesis of Campylobacter fetus infections. Role of surface array proteins in virulence in a mouse model. , 1990, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[25]  J. Abraham,et al.  An invertible element of DNA controls phase variation of type 1 fimbriae of Escherichia coli. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  M. Blaser,et al.  Rearrangement of sapA homologs with conserved and variable regions in Campylobacter fetus. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  M. Blaser,et al.  Pathogenesis of Campylobacter fetus infections: serum resistance associated with high-molecular-weight surface proteins. , 1987, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[28]  M. Blaser,et al.  Pathogenesis of Campylobacter fetus infections. Failure of encapsulated Campylobacter fetus to bind C3b explains serum and phagocytosis resistance. , 1988, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[29]  D. Taylor,et al.  Chloramphenicol resistance in Campylobacter coli: nucleotide sequence, expression, and cloning vector construction. , 1990, Gene.