Human Ex Vivo Artificial Anterior Chamber Model for Practice DMEK Surgery

Purpose: To describe a wet lab model using human corneas for practicing all steps of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Methods: Twelve human research corneas were used for training purposes. Each DMEK surgery required 2 corneas; one for donor graft preparation and one to practice graft insertion and unfolding in a novel artificial anterior chamber model. Results: Six complete DMEK procedures were successfully performed. Apart from donor graft preparation and graft insertion into the anterior chamber, it was feasible to practice different and combinations of graft unfolding techniques in conditions similar to real human procedures. Conclusions: This wet lab model allows practicing steps of DMEK and learning significant surgical skills. Reusable instruments can be used in regular operating facilities resulting in reasonable costs.

[1]  M. Moschos,et al.  Visual Outcomes After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty—Comparison of Specific Matched Pairs , 2016, Cornea.

[2]  D. Ponzin,et al.  Contact Lens-Assisted Pull-Through Technique for Delivery of Tri-Folded (Endothelium in) DMEK Grafts Minimizes Surgical Time and Cell Loss. , 2016, Ophthalmology.

[3]  J. Wen,et al.  Successful Implementation of a Program for Increasing Donor Eyes for Research: The Duke-Miracles In Sight Program. , 2016, Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics.

[4]  M. Wilkins,et al.  Comparison of Early Surgical Experience and Visual Outcomes of DSAEK and DMEK , 2015, Cornea.

[5]  Z. M. Mayko,et al.  The First 100 Eyes of Standardized Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Standardized Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty. , 2015, Ophthalmology.

[6]  W. Sekundo,et al.  A simple ex vivo model for teaching Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty , 2014, Acta ophthalmologica.

[7]  F. Kruse,et al.  Optimizing outcomes with Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty , 2014, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[8]  W. Sekundo,et al.  Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: Learning Curve of a Single Surgeon , 2013, Cornea.

[9]  I. Dapena,et al.  Intraocular graft unfolding techniques in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. , 2013, JAMA ophthalmology.

[10]  Marianne O Price,et al.  Risk of corneal transplant rejection significantly reduced with Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty. , 2012, Ophthalmology.

[11]  Frederico P. Guerra,et al.  Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty: prospective study of 1-year visual outcomes, graft survival, and endothelial cell loss. , 2011, Ophthalmology.

[12]  U. Schlötzer-Schrehardt,et al.  A Stepwise Approach to Donor Preparation and Insertion Increases Safety and Outcome of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2011, Cornea.

[13]  K. Droutsas,et al.  Standardized "no-touch" technique for descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. , 2011, Archives of ophthalmology.

[14]  Caroline L. Speck,et al.  A Comprehensive Analysis of Eye Bank-Prepared Posterior Lamellar Corneal Tissue for Use in Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2009, Cornea.

[15]  G. Melles,et al.  Visual rehabilitation rate after isolated descemet membrane transplantation: descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. , 2009, Archives of ophthalmology.