Multichannel compression hearing aids: effect of channel bandwidth on consonant and vowel identification by hearing-impaired listeners.

Aided consonant and vowel identification was measured in 13 listeners with high-frequency sloping hearing losses. To investigate the influence of compression-channel analysis bandwidth on identification performance independent of the number of channels, performance was compared for three 17-channel compression systems that differed only in terms of their channel bandwidths. One compressor had narrow channels, one had widely overlapping channels, and the third had level-dependent channels. Measurements were done in quiet, in speech-shaped noise, and in a three-talker background. The results showed no effect of channel bandwidth, neither on consonant nor on vowel identification scores. This suggests that channel bandwidth per se has little influence on speech intelligibility when individually prescribed, frequency-varying compressive gain is provided.

[1]  A. Oppenheim,et al.  Computation of spectra with unequal resolution using the fast Fourier transform , 1971 .

[2]  W A Dreschler,et al.  Relations between psychophysical data and speech perception for hearing-impaired subjects. II. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  B C Moore,et al.  Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting: III. A general method for deriving initial fittings for hearing aids with multi-channel compression. , 1999, British journal of audiology.

[4]  Stephanie Bor,et al.  Multichannel compression: effects of reduced spectral contrast on vowel identification. , 2008, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[5]  Jont B. Allen,et al.  Consonant recognition loss in hearing impaired listeners. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  M. Akeroyd.  Are individual differences in speech reception related to individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing-impaired adults , 2008, International journal of audiology.

[7]  T Houtgast,et al.  Effects of degradation of intensity, time, or frequency content on speech intelligibility for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Yund Ew,et al.  The effect of multichannel compression on vowel and stop-consonant discrimination in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. , 1995 .

[9]  A. Nabelek,et al.  Vowel errors in noise and in reverberation by hearing-impaired listeners. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  B C Moore,et al.  Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Donald Hedeker,et al.  Generalized Linear Mixed Models , 2005 .

[12]  R Plomp,et al.  The negative effect of amplitude compression in multichannel hearing aids in the light of the modulation-transfer function. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Brian R Glasberg,et al.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data , 1990, Hearing Research.

[14]  Michelle R. Molis,et al.  Vowel identification by listeners with hearing impairment in response to variation in formant frequencies. , 2011, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[15]  H Levitt,et al.  Consonant-vowel intensity ratios for maximizing consonant recognition by hearing-impaired listeners. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Pamela E Souza,et al.  Effects of Compression on Speech Acoustics, Intelligibility, and Sound Quality , 2002, Trends in amplification.

[17]  Daniel Fogerty,et al.  The role of vowel and consonant fundamental frequency, envelope, and temporal fine structure cues to the intelligibility of words and sentences. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  The Choice of Compression Speed in Hearing Aids: Theoretical and Practical Considerations and the Role of Individual Differences , 2008, Trends in amplification.

[19]  D A Fabry,et al.  Vowel identification and vowel masking patterns of hearing-impaired subjects. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  J Jerger,et al.  Clinical experience with impedance audiometry. , 1970, Archives of otolaryngology.

[21]  K S Helfer,et al.  Aging and consonant errors in reverberation and noise. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  B. Moore,et al.  Benefits of linear amplification and multichannel compression for speech comprehension in backgrounds with spectral and temporal dips. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  Sridhar Kalluri,et al.  Restoration of loudness summation and differential loudness growth in hearing-impaired listeners. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  W. T. Nelson,et al.  A speech corpus for multitalker communications research. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  E W Yund,et al.  Multichannel compression hearing aids: effect of number of channels on speech discrimination in noise. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  G. Studebaker,et al.  Supplementary formulas and tables for calculating and interconverting speech recognition scores in transformed arcsine units , 2004, International journal of audiology.

[27]  J M Kates.  Optimal estimation of hearing-aid compression parameters. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  Harvey Fletcher,et al.  Articulation Testing Methods , 1930 .

[29]  Brent Edwards,et al.  Hearing Aids and Hearing Impairment , 2004 .

[30]  J W Horst.  Frequency discrimination of complex signals, frequency selectivity, and speech perception in hearing-impaired subjects. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  Amyn M. Amlani.  Multichannel Compression Hearing Aids: Perceptual Considerations , 2008 .

[32]  J. Dubno,et al.  Evaluation of hearing-impaired listeners using a Nonsense-syllable Test. II. Syllable recognition and consonant confusion patterns. , 1982, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[33]  Torsten Dau,et al.  Relations between frequency selectivity, temporal fine-structure processing, and speech reception in impaired hearing. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  C Ludvigsen,et al.  DANTALE: a new Danish speech material. , 1989, Scandinavian audiology.

[35]  M R Leek,et al.  Reduced frequency selectivity and the preservation of spectral contrast in noise. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  Julius O. Smith,et al.  Bark and ERB bilinear transforms , 1999, IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process..

[37]  L D Braida,et al.  Principal-component amplitude compression for the hearing impaired. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  W A Dreschler,et al.  Evaluation of spectral enhancement in hearing aids, combined with phonemic compression. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[39]  R. Plomp.  Noise, Amplification, and Compression: Considerations of Three Main Issues in Hearing Aid Design , 1994, Ear and hearing.

[40]  E. Shaw.  Transformation of sound pressure level from the free field to the eardrum in the horizontal plane. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[41]  A K Nábĕlek,et al.  The influence of talker differences on vowel identification by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  White Mw.  Compression systems for hearing aids and cochlear prostheses. , 1986 .

[43]  James M Kates,et al.  Understanding compression: Modeling the effects of dynamic-range compression in hearing aids , 2010, International journal of audiology.

[44]  Murray B. Sachs,et al.  Biological Basis of Hearing-Aid Design , 2002, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[45]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Development of a new method for deriving initial fittings for hearing aids with multi-channel compression: CAMEQ2-HF , 2010, International journal of audiology.