Area classification for explosive atmospheres: Comparison between European and North American approaches

The object of this paper is to review various methods of determining the extent of hazardous areas in industrial facilities where explosive gas or vapor atmospheres may be present. Three different approaches are analyzed and compared. The first one is recommended in North American Standards, such as APl500 [1], APl505 [2] and NFPA 497 [3]. The second is one of the proposals for the second edition of the International Standard IEC 60079-10-1 [4] (adopted as European standard EN 60079-10-1). The third approach had been previously worked out with the authors' contribution and had been adopted by the Italian Guide CEI 31-35 since 2001 [5]. The last two approaches are analytical, meanwhile the first one is prescriptive. In the second part of the paper both analytical approaches are applied to the releases which are analyzed in NFPA 497 [3] as practical examples. Resulting hazardous area extents are compared and the differences among the three methods are discussed.

[1]  Estellito Rangel BRAZIL MOVES FROM DIVISIONS TO ZONES , 2002 .

[2]  Enrico Pons,et al.  Classification of Hazardous Areas Produced by Maintenance Interventions on N.G. Distribution Networks and in the Presence of Open Surface of Flammable Liquid , 2012 .

[3]  Nick Penny,et al.  Electrical Area Classification - Basic Application, Experience, and Judgment , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[4]  J.E. Propst,et al.  Applying the API Alternate Method for Area Classification , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[5]  Enrico Pons,et al.  Classification of hazardous areas produced by maintenance interventions on N.G. distribution networks and in presence of open surface of flammable liquid , 2011, 2011 Record of Conference Papers Industry Applications Society 58th Annual IEEE Petroleum and Chemical Industry Conference (PCIC).

[6]  R. C. Santon,et al.  Ventilation theory and dispersion modelling applied to hazardous area classification , 2011 .

[7]  Thomas B. Smith Area Classification-Past, Present, and Future , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[8]  E. Rangel Brazil moves from divisions to zones [hazardous location safety] , 2002, Record of Conference Papers. Industry Applications Society. Forty-Ninth Annual Conference. 2002 Petroleum and Chemical Industry Technical Conference.

[9]  C. J. H. Bosch,et al.  Methods for the calculation of physical effects , 1997 .

[10]  J. H. Kuczka,et al.  NEC vs. IEC methods of protection for Class I, Division 1 vs. Zone 1, hazardous (classified) locations-a comparative analysis , 1991, Industry Applications Society 38th Annual Petroleum and Chemical Industry Conference.

[11]  Karsten P. Ulland,et al.  Vii. References , 2022 .

[12]  Rhianne Stone Equipment and protective systems intended for use in potentially explosive atmospheres , 2014 .