Breast Positioning during Mammography: Mistakes to be Avoided

Aims and Objectives Breast positioning is the key factor affecting a mammogram. If care is taken during positioning, it maximizes the amount of breast tissue being imaged, eliminates most of the artifacts, and increases sensitivity of the mammogram. This retrospective study was carried out in our department to assess correctness, and also the incorrectness of breast positioning, which need to be avoided to obtain an ideal mammogram. Material and Methods A total of 1369 female patients were included in this study. Mammography was performed on full field detector digital mammography equipment. Craniocaudal (CC) view and mediolateral oblique (MLO) view were carried out for each breast. Four views were done for 1322 patients. The remaining 47 patients had undergone a mastectomy and underwent two views for the other breast. Mistakes in improperly positioned mammogram were assessed with respect to proper visualization of nipple, position of pectoralis major, pectoral–nipple distance (PND), inframammary fold, and adequate coverage of all breast quadrants. Results As per prescribed guidelines, mistakes in positioning were recognized in 2.879% of total mammograms. Improper positioning of the nipple was the commonest problem, seen in 3.827% of mammograms, CC view. On MLO view, bilaterally, pectoralis shadow was not seen in 0.520% mammograms, its margin was not straight/convex in 0.706%, lower edge of pectoralis was above pectoralis–nipple line in 2.081%, and inframammary fold was not seen in 1.189%. There was inadequate coverage of lower quadrants in 2.787%, and mismatch in PND was seen in 3.864%. In few of the patients, the shortcomings as a result of improper positioning were noted on one view, the rest being normal. Conclusion Positioning is the most important factor affecting the resultant mammography image. During mammography, many cases are improperly positioned and as a result the examination is inconclusive, which reduces the sensitivity of mammography.

[1]  Kalpana M Kanal,et al.  Effects of lesion positioning on digital magnification mammography performance. , 2010, Academic radiology.

[2]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Digital mammography image quality: image display. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[3]  C. Markopoulos,et al.  Missed cancers on mammograms: causes and measures of prevention. , 2004, European journal of gynaecological oncology.

[4]  L W Bassett,et al.  Mammographic positioning: evaluation from the view box. , 1993, Radiology.

[5]  E. S. de Paredes,et al.  Missed breast carcinoma: pitfalls and pearls. , 2003, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[6]  G. W. Eklund,et al.  The art of mammographic positioning. , 1992, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[7]  M Muttarak,et al.  Breast carcinomas: why are they missed? , 2006, Singapore medical journal.

[8]  Maryann Chorlton,et al.  Digital mammographic artifacts on full-field systems: what are they and how do I fix them? , 2008, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[9]  C. Claussen,et al.  Evaluation of response in malignant tumors treated with the multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib: a multitechnique imaging assessment. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  Rasha M Kamal,et al.  Missed breast carcinoma; why and how to avoid? , 2007, Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute.

[11]  E. Sickles Practical solutions to common mammographic problems: tailoring the examination. , 1988, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  R. Hendrick,et al.  Lesion size inaccuracies in digital mammography. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  Luca Brunese,et al.  Learning from errors in radiology: a comprehensive review. , 2012, Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR.

[14]  G Cardenosa,et al.  Assessing adequacy of mammographic image quality. , 1994, Radiology.

[15]  O. Gatewood,et al.  Equivocal mammographic findings: evaluation with spot compression. , 1989, Radiology.