Uterine Artery Pulsatility Index Assessment at 11-13+6 Weeks' Gestation

Introduction: First-trimester uterine artery pulsatility index (PI) measurements form part of an algorithm used to assess the risk of developing pre-eclampsia. The objective of this study was to construct a population-specific reference range for both the lower and mean maternal uterine artery PI at 11-13+6 weeks' gestation and to assess measurement agreement. Materials and Methods: Reference ranges for mean and lower PI measurements were developed using polynomial regression models following prospective collection of maternal uterine artery PI measurements at 11-13+6 weeks' gestation. Measurement agreement studies were performed by two experienced operators. Results: Measurements from 298 women were included in the primary study. Polynomial regression indicated no change over gestational age for the lower PI (mean 1.44). There was an inverse relationship between the average PI and gestational age (mean [0.8960 + (2.9771 × CRL-1/2)]2). PI measurement agreement was good-strong (intraclass correlation (ICC) 0.50-0.79) between operators, and within-operator agreement was almost perfect (ICC 0.88-0.93). Conclusions: Reference ranges for both the average and lowest PI of the maternal uterine arteries were derived at 11-13+6 weeks' gestation. This will provide a basis for development of auditable standards for first-trimester uterine artery Doppler measurements. The PI measurements are reproducible and reliable.

[1]  Leslie G. Portney Dpt PhD Fapta,et al.  Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice , 2015 .

[2]  K. Nicolaides,et al.  How to record uterine artery Doppler in the first trimester , 2013, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[3]  F. Costa,et al.  Reference range of uterine artery Doppler parameters between the 11th and 14th pregnancy weeks in a population sample from Northeast Brazil. , 2013, Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia.

[4]  K. Nicolaides,et al.  Prevention of perinatal death and adverse perinatal outcome using low‐dose aspirin: a meta‐analysis , 2013, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[5]  Kypros H. Nicolaides,et al.  Competing Risks Model in Early Screening for Preeclampsia by Biophysical and Biochemical Markers , 2012, Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy.

[6]  B. Thilaganathan,et al.  Uterine artery Doppler screening for pre‐eclampsia: comparison of the lower, mean and higher first‐trimester pulsatility indices , 2011, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[7]  P. Schluter,et al.  Auditing ultrasound assessment of fetal nuchal translucency thickness: A review of Australian national data 2002–2008 , 2010, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[8]  François Audibert,et al.  Prevention of Preeclampsia and Intrauterine Growth Restriction With Aspirin Started in Early Pregnancy: A Meta-Analysis , 2010, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[9]  I. Staboulidou,et al.  Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: screening by uterine artery Doppler at 11–13 weeks , 2009, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[10]  William D. Dupont,et al.  Statistical Modeling for Biomedical Researchers: A Simple Introduction to the Analysis of Complex Data , 2009 .

[11]  B. Thilaganathan,et al.  First‐trimester uterine artery Doppler indices in term and preterm pre‐eclampsia , 2008, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[12]  F. Figueras,et al.  Reference ranges for uterine artery mean pulsatility index at 11–41 weeks of gestation , 2008, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[13]  J. Dungan Antiplatelet agents for prevention of pre-eclampsia: a meta-analysis of individual patient data , 2008 .

[14]  K. Nicolaides,et al.  Uterine artery Doppler at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks in the prediction of pre‐eclampsia , 2007, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[15]  K. Nicolaides,et al.  Nuchal Translucency Measurements for First-Trimester Screening: The ‘Price’ of Inaccuracy , 2007, Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy.

[16]  F. Figueras,et al.  Uterine artery Doppler at 11–14 weeks of gestation to screen for hypertensive disorders and associated complications in an unselected population , 2005, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[17]  J. Spencer-Jones,et al.  Make every mother and child count. , 2005, South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde.

[18]  P. Schluter,et al.  Ultrasonic fetal size measurements in Brisbane, Australia. , 2004, Australasian radiology.

[19]  F. Prefumo,et al.  First‐trimester uterine artery blood flow and birth weight , 2003, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[20]  S. Cicero,et al.  Second-trimester uterine artery Doppler screening in unselected populations: a review , 2002, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[21]  S. Cicero,et al.  Screening for pre‐eclampsia and fetal growth restriction by uterine artery Doppler at 11–14 weeks of gestation , 2001, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[22]  K. Nicolaides,et al.  UK multicentre project on assessment of risk of trisomy 21 by maternal age and fetal nuchal-translucency thickness at 10–14 weeks of gestation , 1998, The Lancet.

[23]  H. Muñoz,et al.  Uterine artery blood flow velocity waveforms in pregnant women with müllerian duct anomaly: a biologic model for uteroplacental insufficiency. , 1998, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[24]  P. Royston,et al.  How to construct ‘normal ranges’ for fetal variables , 1998, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[25]  S. Rotmensch,et al.  Uterine artery Doppler velocimetry in pregnant women with lateral placentas , 1997, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[26]  S. Robson,et al.  Charts of fetal size , 1994, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[27]  D. Altman,et al.  Charts of fetal size: 1. Methodology , 1994, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[28]  D. Altman,et al.  Design and analysis of studies to derive charts of fetal size , 1993, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[29]  P. Meis,et al.  The effect of placental location on uterine artery flow velocity waveforms. , 1988, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.