LTE and IEEE 802.11p for vehicular networking: a performance evaluation

Various wireless communication systems exist, which enable a wide range of applications and use cases in the vehicular environment. These applications can be grouped into three types, namely, road safety, traffic efficiency, and infotainment, each with its own set of functional and performance requirements. In pursuance of assisting drivers to travel safely and comfortably, several of these requirements have to be met simultaneously. While the coexistence of multiple radio access technologies brings immense opportunities towards meeting most of the vehicular networking application requirements, it is equally important and challenging to identify the strength and weaknesses of each technology and understand which technology is more suitable for the given networking scenario. In this paper, we evaluate two of the most viable communication standards, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) 802.11p and long-term evolution (LTE) by 3rd Generation Partnership Project for vehicular networking. A detailed performance evaluation study of the standards is given for a variety of parameter settings such as beacon transmission frequency, vehicle density, and vehicle average speed. Both standards are compared in terms of delay, reliability, scalability, and mobility support in the context of various application requirements. Furthermore, through extensive simulation-based study, we validated the effectiveness of both standards to handle different application requirements and share insight for further research directions. The results indicate that IEEE 802.11p offers acceptable performance for sparse network topologies with limited mobility support. On the other hand, LTE meets most of the application requirements in terms of reliability, scalability, and mobility support; however, it is challenging to obtain stringent delay requirements in the presence of higher cellular network traffic load.

[1]  H. T. Mouftah,et al.  Performance Analysis of the EDCA Medium Access Mechanism over the Control Channel of an IEEE 802.11p WAVE Vehicular Network , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[2]  Aravind Kota Gopalakrishna,et al.  QoS-enabled group communication in integrated VANET-LTE heterogeneous wireless networks , 2011, 2011 IEEE 7th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob).

[3]  Fan Bai,et al.  Reliability Analysis of DSRC Wireless Communication for Vehicle Safety Applications , 2006, 2006 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference.

[4]  Alexey V. Vinel,et al.  3GPP LTE Versus IEEE 802.11p/WAVE: Which Technology is Able to Support Cooperative Vehicular Safety Applications? , 2012, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.

[5]  Mauro Conti,et al.  Smartphone and Laptop Frameworks for vehicular networking experimentation , 2013, 2013 IFIP Wireless Days (WD).

[6]  Thiago Meireles Paixão,et al.  A 802.11p prototype implementation , 2010, 2010 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium.

[7]  Antonio Iera,et al.  LTE for vehicular networking: a survey , 2013, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[8]  Marco Miozzo,et al.  A Lightweight and Accurate Link Abstraction Model for the System-Level Simulation of LTE networks in ns-3 , 2012 .

[9]  Juan-Carlos Cano,et al.  Evaluating the Feasibility of Using Smartphones for ITS Safety Applications , 2013, 2013 IEEE 77th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[10]  JeongGil Ko,et al.  A Feasibility Study and Development Framework Design for Realizing Smartphone-Based Vehicular Networking Systems , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[11]  Sabine Sories,et al.  A Capacity Analysis for the Transmission of Event and Cooperative Awareness Messages in LTE Networks , 2011 .

[12]  Janne Riihijarvi,et al.  Performance evaluation of IEEE 1609 WAVE and IEEE 802.11p for vehicular communications , 2010, 2010 Second International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN).

[13]  R. Litjens,et al.  Modeling and Evaluation of LTE in Intelligent Transportation Systems , 2012 .

[14]  Sidi-Mohammed Senouci,et al.  LTE4V2X: LTE for a Centralized VANET Organization , 2011, 2011 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference - GLOBECOM 2011.

[15]  Y. Koucheryavy,et al.  Scalability Analysis of Infrastructure Networks for Vehicular Safety Applications , 2012, 2012 International Conference on Connected Vehicles and Expo (ICCVE).

[16]  A. F. Adams,et al.  The Survey , 2021, Dyslexia in Higher Education.

[17]  Mehrdad Dianati,et al.  Effective implementation of location services for VANETs in hybrid network infrastructures , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC).

[18]  Jelena V. Misic,et al.  Tradeoff Issues for CCH/SCH Duty Cycle for IEEE 802.11p Single Channel Devices , 2010, 2010 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference GLOBECOM 2010.

[19]  Chanik Park,et al.  Survey of MAC Protocols for Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks , 2012, Smart Comput. Rev..

[20]  Kun-Chan Lan,et al.  A Feasibility Study on Vehicle-to-Infrastructure Communication: WiFi vs. WiMAX , 2009, 2009 Tenth International Conference on Mobile Data Management: Systems, Services and Middleware.

[21]  Sungyoung Lee,et al.  Performance Analysis of LTE Smartphones-Based Vehicle-to-Infrastrcuture Communication , 2012, 2012 9th International Conference on Ubiquitous Intelligence and Computing and 9th International Conference on Autonomic and Trusted Computing.

[22]  S. Busanelli,et al.  Cross-network information dissemination in VANETs , 2011, 2011 11th International Conference on ITS Telecommunications.

[23]  Rahim Tafazolli,et al.  Throughput Analysis of the IEEE 802.11p Enhanced Distributed Channel Access Function in Vehicular Environment , 2010, 2010 IEEE 72nd Vehicular Technology Conference - Fall.

[24]  Juan C. Burguillo,et al.  Performance analysis of IEEE 802.11p in urban environments using a multi-agent model , 2008, 2008 IEEE 19th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications.

[25]  N. Czink,et al.  Average Downstream Performance of Measured IEEE 802.11p Infrastructure-to-Vehicle Links , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops.

[26]  Daniel Krajzewicz,et al.  Recent Development and Applications of SUMO - Simulation of Urban MObility , 2012 .

[27]  Fethi Filali,et al.  A Comparative Study between 802.11p and Mobile WiMAX-based V2I Communication Networks , 2010, 2010 Fourth International Conference on Next Generation Mobile Applications, Services and Technologies.

[28]  Pino Caballero-Gil,et al.  Design and Implementation of an Application for Deploying Vehicular Networks with Smartphones , 2013, Int. J. Distributed Sens. Networks.

[29]  Eylem Ekici,et al.  Vehicular Networking: A Survey and Tutorial on Requirements, Architectures, Challenges, Standards and Solutions , 2011, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[30]  Sergio M. Savaresi,et al.  A Centralized Real-Time Driver Assistance System for Road Safety Based on Smartphone , 2012 .

[31]  Stephan Eichler,et al.  Performance Evaluation of the IEEE 802.11p WAVE Communication Standard , 2007, 2007 IEEE 66th Vehicular Technology Conference.

[32]  Kaustubh R. Joshi,et al.  Enabling vehicular safety applications over LTE networks , 2013, 2013 International Conference on Connected Vehicles and Expo (ICCVE).

[33]  Marco Miozzo,et al.  A lightweight and accurate link abstraction model for the simulation of LTE networks in ns-3 , 2012, MSWiM '12.

[34]  Lian Zhao,et al.  Performance Analysis of Broadcast Messages in VANETs Safety Applications , 2010, 2010 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference GLOBECOM 2010.

[35]  Yanmin Zhu,et al.  When 3G Meets VANET: 3G-Assisted Data Delivery in VANETs , 2013, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[36]  Jun-Ho Lee,et al.  A Performance Evaluation of Cellular Network Suitability for VANET , 2012 .

[37]  Marion Berbineau,et al.  The WiMAX ASN Network in the V2I Scenario , 2008, 2008 IEEE 68th Vehicular Technology Conference.

[38]  Elie Sfeir,et al.  Performance Evaluation of , 2005 .