Authorship in science: A critical analysis from a Foucauldian perspective

This article aims to contribute to the discussion on authorship in contemporary science from Foucauldian and Kuhnian perspectives, highlighting the social aspects of science and the role of authorship in scientific revolutions. Thus, it describes the functions of the ‘author’ discussed by Foucault that can assist to reveal the characteristics of the scientific practice and examples of how theories are materialized. As a result, it identifies the ways in which modern science is developed and how knowledge is construed by multiple authors, group authors, the merit that is attributed by citations, etc. This article highlights the complexity of authorship attribution and the need to rethink generalized bibliometric techniques to evaluate science considering other aspects that go beyond the mere listing of the authors.

[1]  Dietmar Wolfram,et al.  The relationship between the author byline and contribution lists: a comparison of three general medical journals , 2017, Scientometrics.

[2]  Christian Catalini,et al.  The incidence and role of negative citations in science , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Daniel Martínez-Ávila,et al.  What is an author now? Discourse analysis applied to the idea of an author , 2015, J. Documentation.

[4]  Eva Ortoll,et al.  Principales parámetros para el estudio de la colaboración científica en Big Science , 2014 .

[5]  J. A. Neto.  A noção de autor em barthes, foucault e Agamben , 2014 .

[6]  Emilio Delgado López-Cózar,et al.  La autoría científica en las áreas de ciencia y tecnología. Políticas internacionales y prácticas editoriales en las revistas científicas españolas , 2014 .

[7]  Edna Lúcia da Silva,et al.  O pesquisador e a produção científica , 2014 .

[8]  R. Barthes,et al.  The Death of the Author , 2013 .

[9]  George A. Lozano,et al.  Ethics of Using Language Editing Services in An Era of Digital Communication and Heavily Multi-Authored Papers , 2013, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[10]  Richard P. Smiraglia,et al.  Rethinking the Authorship Principle , 2012, Libr. Trends.

[11]  Leandro Innocentini Lopes de Faria,et al.  Bibliometria e "avaliação" da atividade científica: um estudo sobre o índice h , 2012 .

[12]  Elizabeth Wager,et al.  How to handle authorship disputes: a guide for new researchers , 2009, Science Editor and Publisher.

[13]  J. Cavalheiro.  A concepção de autor em Bakhtin, Barthes e Foucault , 2008 .

[14]  R. Stallman.  Did You Say ‘Intellectual Property’? It's a Seductive Mirage , 2006 .

[15]  John M. Budd,et al.  Discourse Analysis and the Study of Communication in LIS , 2006, Libr. Trends.

[16]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  A concise review on the role of author self-citations in information science, bibliometrics and science policy , 2006, Scientometrics.

[17]  José Guilherme Silva Vieira,et al.  A Estrutura das Revoluções Científicas na Economia e a Revolução Keynesiana , 2006 .

[18]  Kimmo Tuominen,et al.  "Isms" in information science: constructivism, collectivism and constructionism , 2005, J. Documentation.

[19]  Dag W. Aksnes,et al.  A macro study of self-citation , 2003, Scientometrics.

[20]  Richard P. Smiraglia.  The Nature of 'A Work': Implications for the Organization of Knowledge , 2001 .

[21]  R. Stallman.  Science must 'push copyright aside' , 2001 .

[22]  Sanna Talja,et al.  Analyzing Qualitative Interview Data: The Discourse Analytic Method , 1999 .

[23]  Kalervo Järvelin,et al.  Discourse analysis of user requests , 1998, CACM.

[24]  John M. Budd,et al.  Discourse Analysis: Method and Application in the Study of Information , 1996, Inf. Process. Manag..

[25]  O. Persson,et al.  Understanding Patterns of International Scientific Collaboration , 1992 .

[26]  R. Merton.  The Matthew Effect in Science, II: Cumulative Advantage and the Symbolism of Intellectual Property , 1988, Isis.

[27]  M. Bakhtin,et al.  Speech genres and other late essays , 1988 .

[28]  H. Dreyfus,et al.  Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. , 1985 .

[29]  Daryl E. Chubin,et al.  Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? , 1979, Scientometrics.

[30]  M. Foucault,et al.  Language, Counter-Memory, Practice , 1978 .

[31]  R. Merton,et al.  The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations , 1973 .

[32]  Mark Abrahamson,et al.  The Scientific Community. , 1966 .

[33]  H. Moulaison,et al.  Foucault, the Author, and Intellectual Debt: Capturing the Author-Function Through Attributes, Relationships, and Events in Knowledge Organization Systems , 2014 .

[34]  Birger Hjørland,et al.  Theories of knowledge organization — theories of knowledge , 2013 .

[35]  Joseph T. Tennis,et al.  Epistemology, Theory, and Methodology in Knowledge Organization: Toward a Classification, Metatheory, and Research Framework , 2008 .

[36]  Lawrence Lessig,et al.  Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity , 2004 .

[37]  David Gauntlett.  Media, Gender and Identity: An Introduction , 2002 .

[38]  Blaise Cronin,et al.  Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? , 2001, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[39]  Michel Foucault,et al.  Aesthetics, method, and epistemology , 1998 .

[40]  Irati Antonio.  Autoria e cultura na pós-modernidade , 1998 .

[41]  Vera Portocarrero.  Filosofia, história e sociologia das ciências I: abordagens contemporâneas , 1994 .

[42]  M. Foucault,et al.  The Foucault Reader , 1984 .

[43]  B. Latour,et al.  Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts , 1979 .

[44]  D. Price.  Little Science, Big Science , 1965 .