Ensemble of classifiers approach for NDT data fusion

Several measurement modalities have been developed over the years for various nondestructive testing and evaluation (NDT and E) applications, such as ultrasonic, magnetic flux leakage, and eddy current testing, all of which have been used extensively in pipeline defect identification. While it is generally believed that different testing modalities provide complementary information, only a single testing modality is typically used for a given application. This is part due to lack of effective, computationally feasible data fusion algorithms that are applicable to NDT and E signals. Such an algorithm capable of data fusion can combine information from two or more different sources of data, giving more insight and confidence to the data analysis than a decision that would otherwise be based on either of the sources alone. Learn++, previously introduced as an incremental learning algorithm, was applied to a NDT and E data fusion application. Specifically, we generated two ensembles of classifiers, one trained on ultrasonic signals, and the other on corresponding magnetic flux leakage signals obtained from stainless steel samples that contained five classes of discontinuities: crack, pitting, weld, mechanical damage, and no discontinuity. We have observed that the prediction ability of the automated classification system, as measured by the accuracy and reliability of the classification performance on validation data, was significantly improved when the two data sources were combined using Learn++.

[1]  Jiri Matas,et al.  On Combining Classifiers , 1998, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[2]  G DietterichThomas An Experimental Comparison of Three Methods for Constructing Ensembles of Decision Trees , 2000 .

[3]  David H. Wolpert,et al.  Stacked generalization , 1992, Neural Networks.

[4]  Lawrence A. Klein,et al.  Sensor and Data Fusion Concepts and Applications , 1993 .

[5]  Josef Kittler,et al.  Multiple expert system design by combined feature selection and probability level fusion , 2000, Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Information Fusion.

[6]  Pascal Vasseur,et al.  Introduction to Multisensor Data Fusion , 2005, The Industrial Information Technology Handbook.

[7]  Johannes R. Sveinsson,et al.  Use of multiple classifiers in classification of data from multiple data sources , 2001, IGARSS 2001. Scanning the Present and Resolving the Future. Proceedings. IEEE 2001 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (Cat. No.01CH37217).

[8]  Ludmila I. Kuncheva,et al.  Switching between selection and fusion in combining classifiers: an experiment , 2002, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B.

[9]  Luis O. Jimenez,et al.  Classification of hyperdimensional data based on feature and decision fusion approaches using projection pursuit, majority voting, and neural networks , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[10]  James Llinas,et al.  Handbook of Multisensor Data Fusion , 2001 .

[11]  Ludmila I. Kuncheva,et al.  A Theoretical Study on Six Classifier Fusion Strategies , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[12]  R. French Catastrophic forgetting in connectionist networks , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  Thomas G. Dietterich An Experimental Comparison of Three Methods for Constructing Ensembles of Decision Trees: Bagging, Boosting, and Randomization , 2000, Machine Learning.

[14]  Vasant Honavar,et al.  Learn++: an incremental learning algorithm for supervised neural networks , 2001, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C.

[15]  Josef Kittler,et al.  Information Analysis of Multiple Classifier Fusion , 2001, Multiple Classifier Systems.

[16]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Decision-Level Fusion in Fingerprint Verification , 2001, Multiple Classifier Systems.