Hybrid consensus protocols: An impulsive dynamical system approach

In this paper, we develop a novel hybrid control framework for addressing consensus problems for multiagent dynamical systems. Specifically, we present hybrid distributed controller architectures for multiagent coordination. The proposed controller architectures are predicated on system thermodynamic notions resulting in thermodynamically consistent hybrid controller architectures involving the exchange of information between agents that guarantee that the closed-loop dynamical network is consistent with basic thermodynamic principles. A unique feature of the proposed framework is that the proposed controller architectures are hybrid and can achieve finite-time coordination. The overall closed-loop dynamics under any of these controller algorithms achieving consensus possesses discontinuous flows since the controller algorithms combine logical switchings with continuous dynamics, leading to impulsive differential equations.

[1]  A. Samoilenko,et al.  Impulsive differential equations , 1995 .

[2]  Jie Lin,et al.  Coordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules , 2003, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[3]  J.M. Avis,et al.  Energy-based hybrid control for the RTAC system: experimental results , 2008, 2008 American Control Conference.

[4]  Randal W. Beard,et al.  Consensus seeking in multiagent systems under dynamically changing interaction topologies , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[5]  Wassim M. Haddad,et al.  Distributed nonlinear control algorithms for network consensus , 2008, Autom..

[6]  George J. Pappas,et al.  Flocking in Fixed and Switching Networks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[7]  S. Bhat,et al.  Lyapunov analysis of semistability , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 American Control Conference (Cat. No. 99CH36251).

[8]  Wassim M. Haddad,et al.  Energy- and Entropy-Based Stabilization for Lossless Dynamical Systems via Hybrid Controllers , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[9]  Vicsek,et al.  Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[10]  Jorge Cortés,et al.  Finite-time convergent gradient flows with applications to network consensus , 2006, Autom..

[11]  D. Baĭnov,et al.  Systems with impulse effect : stability, theory, and applications , 1989 .

[12]  V. Lakshmikantham,et al.  Theory of Impulsive Differential Equations , 1989, Series in Modern Applied Mathematics.

[13]  S. Bhat,et al.  An invariance principle for nonlinear hybrid and impulsive dynamical systems , 2003 .

[14]  Dennis S. Bernstein,et al.  Nontangency-Based Lyapunov Tests for Convergence and Stability in Systems Having a Continuum of Equilibria , 2003, SIAM J. Control. Optim..

[15]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  Consensus problems in networks of agents with switching topology and time-delays , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[16]  Wassim M. Haddad,et al.  Non-linear impulsive dynamical systems. Part I: Stability and dissipativity , 2001 .

[17]  Wassim M. Haddad,et al.  Thermodynamics, A Dynamical Systems Approach , 2010 .

[18]  Wassim M. Haddad,et al.  Impulsive and Hybrid Dynamical Systems: Stability, Dissipativity, and Control , 2006 .

[19]  Sanjay P. Bhat,et al.  Finite-Time Semistability and Consensus for Nonlinear Dynamical Networks , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.