A Quantitative Risk Analysis Method for the High Hazard Mechanical System in Petroleum and Petrochemical Industry

The high hazard mechanical system (HHMS) has three characteristics in the petroleum and petrochemical industry (PPI): high risk, high cost, and high technology requirements. For a HHMS, part, component, and subsystem failures will result in varying degrees and various types of risk consequences, including unexpected downtime, production losses, economic costs, safety accidents, and environmental pollution. Thus, obtaining the quantitative risk level and distribution in a HHMS to control major risk accidents and ensure safe production is of vital importance. However, the structure of the HHMS is more complex than some other systems, making the quantitative risk analysis process more difficult. Additionally, a variety of uncertain risk data hinder the realization of quantitative risk analysis. A few quantitative risk analysis techniques and studies for HHMS exist, especially in the PPI. Therefore, a study on the quantitative risk analysis method for HHMS was completed to obtain the risk level and distribution of high-risk objects. Firstly, Fuzzy Set Theory (FST) was applied to address the uncertain risk data for the occurrence probability (OP) and consequence severity (CS) in the risk analysis process. Secondly, a fuzzy fault tree analysis (FFTA) and a fuzzy event tree analysis (FETA) were used to achieve quantitative risk analysis and calculation. Thirdly, a fuzzy bow-tie model (FBTM) was established to obtain a quantitative risk assessment result according to the analysis results of the FFTA and FETA. Finally, the feasibility and practicability of the method were verified with a case study on the quantitative risk analysis of one reciprocating pump system (RPS). The quantitative risk analysis method for HHMS can provide more accurate and scientific data support for the development of Asset Integrity Management (AIM) systems in the PPI.

[1]  Loon Ching Tang,et al.  Fuzzy assessment of FMEA for engine systems , 2002, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[2]  Audun Brandsæter Risk assessment in the offshore industry , 2002 .

[3]  F R Chevreau,et al.  Organizing learning processes on risks by using the bow-tie representation. , 2006, Journal of hazardous materials.

[4]  Rehan Sadiq,et al.  Predicting risk of water quality failures in distribution networks under uncertainties using fault-tree analysis , 2008 .

[5]  Adam S. Markowski,et al.  Fuzzy logic for process safety analysis , 2009 .

[6]  Brian Veitch,et al.  Handling data uncertainties in event tree analysis , 2009 .

[7]  M. Scorsetti,et al.  Applying failure mode effects and criticality analysis in radiotherapy: lessons learned and perspectives of enhancement. , 2010, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[8]  K. Boryczko,et al.  Failure scenarios in water supply system by means of fault tree analysis , 2011 .

[9]  Brian Veitch,et al.  Fault and Event Tree Analyses for Process Systems Risk Analysis: Uncertainty Handling Formulations , 2011, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[10]  Solomon Tesfamariam,et al.  Risk analysis for oil & gas pipelines: A sustainability assessment approach using fuzzy based bow-tie analysis , 2012 .

[11]  R. Sadiq,et al.  Analyzing system safety and risks under uncertainty using a bow-tie diagram: An innovative approach , 2013 .

[12]  K. Boryczko,et al.  Possibilistic risk analysis of failure in water supply network , 2014 .

[13]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Quantitative assessment of safety barrier performance in the prevention of domino scenarios triggered by fire , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[14]  Alireza Behrad,et al.  Public Transport Risk Assessment through Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) , 2016, Bulletin de la Société Royale des Sciences de Liège.

[15]  Bekir Sahin,et al.  A Novel Real-Time Continuous Fuzzy Fault Tree Analysis (RC-FFTA) Model for Dynamic Environment , 2016 .

[16]  Gabriele Landucci,et al.  A methodology for frequency tailorization dedicated to the Oil & Gas sector , 2016 .

[17]  Marc Schiler,et al.  A method of probabilistic risk assessment for energy performance and cost using building energy simulation , 2016 .

[18]  Genserik Reniers,et al.  On the assessment of uncertainty in risk diagrams , 2016 .

[19]  Floris Goerlandt,et al.  Validity and validation of safety-related quantitative risk analysis , 2016 .

[20]  Weldon A. Lodwick,et al.  Fuzzy Sets Theory and Uncertainty in Mathematical Modeling , 2017 .

[21]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  HazMat transportation risk assessment: A revisitation in the perspective of the Viareggio LPG accident , 2017 .

[22]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  A methodology for the analysis of domino and cascading events in Oil & Gas facilities operating in harsh environments , 2017 .

[23]  Floris Goerlandt,et al.  An approach for reconciling different perspectives and stakeholder views on risk ranking , 2017 .

[24]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Risk assessment of mitigated domino scenarios in process facilities , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..