A practical guide to understanding the 2002 ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.

Numerous advances have been made in recent years in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). These advances, based on clinical observations, experience, and randomized clinical trials, have led many cardiologists, emergency medicine physicians, and allied healthcare professionals to change their practices. Some physicians, however, have been slow to embrace the new trends. In fact, research shows that a wide gap exists between how evidence suggests patients with ACS should be treated and how these patients actually are treated across the United States. Since 1980, a joint task force sponsored by the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA) has published guidelines for the treatment of various cardiovascular diseases. The guidelines are intended to assist healthcare professionals in making appropriate decisions about the diagnosis and management of specific conditions. The ACC/AHA guidelines for the treatment of patients with unstable angina and non-ST segment elevation ACS (NSTE ACS) were first established in 1994 by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, now the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Since the initial publication of the guidelines, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors were shown to improve outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb-IIIa inhibitors were shown to reduce the risk of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) in several large studies, and an early invasive management strategy was shown to reduce long-term mortality. In September 2000, the ACC and AHA jointly published new guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina or NSTE acute MI (NSTEMI), the two conditions that collectively make up NSTE ACS. The guidelines were further updated in March 2002, based on new evidence. The treatment of patients with unstable angina or NSTEMI has changed dramatically in the past 6 years, and the changes to the guidelines reflect our growing understanding of the disease. Unstable angina and NSTEMI are deadly diseases that have major public health implications. The National Center for Health Statistics reported that in 1996 alone there were 1,433,000 hospitalizations for unstable angina and NSTEMI. Data from the Platelet Glycoprotein IIb-IIIa in Unstable Angina: Receptor SuppresAdditional material related to this article can be found on the Critical Pathways in Cardiology web site. Go to the following address, click on Article Plus button next to the article in Table of

[1]  K. Swedberg,et al.  Buccal versus intravenous nitroglyerin in unstable angina pectoris , 2004, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

[2]  Carl J Pepine,et al.  ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction--summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  R. Califf,et al.  Underuse of aspirin in a referral population with documented coronary artery disease. , 2002, The American journal of cardiology.

[4]  Robert Parrish,et al.  Improving quality of care for acute myocardial infarction: The Guidelines Applied in Practice (GAP) Initiative. , 2002, JAMA.

[5]  A. Connor,et al.  The way I see it: House officers need formal career development , 2002 .

[6]  A. Mattioli,et al.  Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  Catherine Sudlow,et al.  Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  C. Vassanelli,et al.  [Comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in patients with unstable coronary syndromes treated with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban]. , 2001, Italian heart journal. Supplement : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology.

[9]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  A. Go,et al.  The prognostic value of troponin in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: a meta-analysis. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  M. Simoons Effect of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blocker abciximab on outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes without early coronary revascularisation: the GUSTO IV-ACS randomised trial , 2001, The Lancet.

[12]  A. Gawlinski,et al.  Improved treatment of coronary heart disease by implementation of a Cardiac Hospitalization Atherosclerosis Management Program (CHAMP). , 2001, The American journal of cardiology.

[13]  G. Montalescot,et al.  Percutaneous Coronary Intervention After Subcutaneous Enoxaparin Pretreatment in Patients With Unstable Angina Pectoris , 2001, Circulation.

[14]  P. R. R. Ecurrent,et al.  EFFECTS OF CLOPIDOGREL IN ADDITION TO ASPIRIN IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES WITHOUT ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION , 2001 .

[15]  J. W. Schaeffer,et al.  ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina and non–st-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A report of the american college of cardiology/ american heart association task force on practice guidelines (committee on the management of patients with unstable angina) , 2000 .

[16]  R. Califf,et al.  Early percutaneous coronary intervention, platelet inhibition with eptifibatide, and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes. PURSUIT Investigators. , 2000, Circulation.

[17]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators. , 2000 .

[18]  R. Califf,et al.  Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibition in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: early benefit during medical treatment only, with additional protection during percutaneous coronary intervention. , 1999, Circulation.

[19]  E. Antman,et al.  Assessment of the treatment effect of enoxaparin for unstable angina/non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. TIMI 11B-ESSENCE meta-analysis. , 1999, Circulation.

[20]  S. Snapinn,et al.  Intracoronary thrombus and platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade with tirofiban in unstable angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. Angiographic results from the PRISM-PLUS trial (Platelet receptor inhibition for ischemic syndrome management in patients limited by unstable signs and s , 1999, Circulation.

[21]  R. Califf,et al.  Prognostic value of the admission electrocardiogram in acute coronary syndromes. , 1999, JAMA.

[22]  David P Miller,et al.  Clinical outcomes of therapeutic agents that block the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa integrin in ischemic heart disease. , 1998, Circulation.

[23]  R. Califf,et al.  Potential impact of evidence-based medicine in acute coronary syndromes: insights from GUSTO-IIb. Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Arteries in Acute Coronary Syndromes trial. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  R. Collins,et al.  Prevention of cardiovascular events and death with pravastatin in patients with coronary heart disease and a broad range of initial cholesterol levels. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  K. Lee,et al.  Value of serial troponin T measures for early and late risk stratification in patients with acute coronary syndromes. The GUSTO-IIa Investigators. , 1998, Circulation.

[26]  R. Makuch,et al.  Verapamil use in patients with cardiovascular disease: An overview of randomized trials , 1998, Clinical cardiology.

[27]  S Hulley,et al.  Randomized trial of estrogen plus progestin for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women. Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS) Research Group. , 1998, JAMA.

[28]  R. Collins,et al.  Indications for ACE inhibitors in the early treatment of acute myocardial infarction: systematic overview of individual data from 100,000 patients in randomized trials. ACE Inhibitor Myocardial Infarction Collaborative Group. , 1998, Circulation.

[29]  M. Simoons,et al.  A clinical trial comparing primary coronary angioplasty with tissue plasminogen activator for acute myocardial infarction. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[30]  M. Dennis A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE). CAPRIE Steering Committee , 1996 .

[31]  M. Whooley,et al.  Adding Heparin to Aspirin Reduces the Incidence of Myocardial Infarction and Death in Patients With Unstable Angina: A Meta-analysis , 1996 .

[32]  E. Antman Hirudin in acute myocardial infarction. Thrombolysis and Thrombin Inhibition in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 9B trial. , 1996, Circulation.

[33]  D. Clement A randomised, blinded, trial of Clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE) , 1996 .

[34]  M. Simoons A comparison of recombinant hirudin with heparin for the treatment of acute coronary syndromes. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[35]  P. Serruys,et al.  A comparison of hirudin with heparin in the prevention of restenosis after coronary angioplasty. Helvetica Investigators. , 1995, The New England journal of medicine.

[36]  Walker,et al.  Collaborative overview of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy Prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke by prolonged antiplatelet therapy in various categories of patients , 1994 .

[37]  R. Lidón,et al.  Rebound myocardial ischaemia following abrupt interruption of intravenous nitroglycerin infusion in patients with unstable angina at rest. , 1991, European heart journal.

[38]  J. Miller,et al.  Electrocardiographic subset analysis of diltiazem administration on long-term outcome after acute myocardial infarction. The Multicenter Diltiazem Post-Infarction Trial Research Group. , 1991, The American journal of cardiology.

[39]  J. Wittes,et al.  Overview of results of randomized clinical trials in heart disease. II. Unstable angina, heart failure, primary prevention with aspirin, and risk factor modification. , 1988, JAMA.

[40]  Sarah Parish,et al.  Randomized trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-2.ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group. , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[41]  J. Lubsen,et al.  Efficacy of nifedipine and metoprolol in the early treatment of unstable angina in the coronary care unit: findings from the Holland Interuniversity Nifedipine/metoprolol Trial (HINT). , 1987, The American journal of cardiology.

[42]  M. LeWinter,et al.  Protective effects of aspirin against acute myocardial infarction and death in men with unstable angina. Results of a Veterans Administration Cooperative Study. , 1983, The New England journal of medicine.

[43]  E. Veys,et al.  HL-A AND INFECTIVE SACROILEITIS , 1974 .