Sign Language Representation by TEO Humanoid Robot: End-User Interest, Comprehension and Satisfaction

In this paper, we illustrate our work on improving the accessibility of Cyber–Physical Systems (CPS), presenting a study on human–robot interaction where the end-users are either deaf or hearing-impaired people. Current trends in robotic designs include devices with robotic arms and hands capable of performing manipulation and grasping tasks. This paper focuses on how these devices can be used for a different purpose, which is that of enabling robotic communication via sign language. For the study, several tests and questionnaires are run to check and measure how end-users feel about interpreting sign language represented by a humanoid robotic assistant as opposed to subtitles on a screen. Stemming from this dichotomy, dactylology, basic vocabulary representation and end-user satisfaction are the main topics covered by a delivered form, in which additional commentaries are valued and taken into consideration for further decision taking regarding robot-human interaction. The experiments were performed using TEO, a household companion humanoid robot developed at the University Carlos III de Madrid (UC3M), via representations in Spanish Sign Language (LSE), and a total of 16 deaf and hearing-impaired participants.

[1]  Dorothy Watson,et al.  Correcting for Acquiescent Response Bias in the Absence of a Balanced Scale , 1992 .

[2]  R. Likert “Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes, A” , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[3]  James R. Lewis,et al.  Evaluation of Procedures for Adjusting Problem-Discovery Rates Estimated From Small Samples , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[4]  H. Seal Studies in the history of probability and statistics. XV. The historical velopment of the Gauss linear model. , 1967, Biometrika.

[5]  Robert L. Armstrong,et al.  The Midpoint on a Five-Point Likert-Type Scale , 1987 .

[6]  Hatice Kose-Bagci,et al.  Tale of a robot: Humanoid robot assisted sign language tutoring , 2011, 2011 11th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.

[7]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Determining Usability Test Sample Size , 2006 .

[8]  Carlos Balaguer,et al.  Personal Autonomy Rehabilitation in Home Environments by a Portable Assistive Robot , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[9]  Hatice Kose-Bagci,et al.  A New Robotic Platform for Sign Language Tutoring , 2015, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[10]  Raul Fernandez-Fernandez,et al.  Improving and evaluating robotic garment unfolding: A garment-agnostic approach , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Autonomous Robot Systems and Competitions (ICARSC).

[11]  Raul Fernandez-Fernandez,et al.  Robotic ironing with 3D perception and force/torque feedback in household environments , 2017, 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[12]  Fei Yang,et al.  Recognition of Nonmanual Markers in American Sign Language (ASL) Using Non-Parametric Adaptive 2D-3D Face Tracking , 2012, LREC.

[13]  J. Dawes Do Data Characteristics Change According to the Number of Scale Points Used? An Experiment Using 5-Point, 7-Point and 10-Point Scales , 2008 .

[14]  Karl F. MacDorman,et al.  The Uncanny Valley [From the Field] , 2012, IEEE Robotics Autom. Mag..

[15]  Evie McCrum-Gardner,et al.  Which is the correct statistical test to use? , 2008, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[16]  Q. Mcnemar Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages , 1947, Psychometrika.

[17]  Robert A. Virzi,et al.  Refining the Test Phase of Usability Evaluation: How Many Subjects Is Enough? , 1992 .

[18]  Morten Wang Fagerland,et al.  The McNemar test for binary matched-pairs data: mid-p and asymptotic are better than exact conditional , 2013, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[19]  A. L. Edwards Note on the “correction for continuity” in testing the significance of the difference between correlated proportions , 1948, Psychometrika.

[20]  P. Asaro Transforming society by transforming technology: the science and politics of participatory design , 2000 .

[21]  Molly Follette Story,et al.  The Universal Design File: Designing for People of All Ages and Abilities. Revised Edition. , 1998 .