Direct Image-to-Geometry Registration Using Mobile Sensor Data

Abstract. Adding supplementary texture and 2D image-based annotations to 3D surface models is a useful next step for domain specialists to make use of photorealistic products of laser scanning and photogrammetry. This requires a registration between the new camera imagery and the model geometry to be solved, which can be a time-consuming task without appropriate automation. The increasing availability of photorealistic models, coupled with the proliferation of mobile devices, gives users the possibility to complement their models in real time. Modern mobile devices deliver digital photographs of increasing quality, as well as on-board sensor data, which can be used as input for practical and automatic camera registration procedures. Their familiar user interface also improves manual registration procedures. This paper introduces a fully automatic pose estimation method using the on-board sensor data for initial exterior orientation, and feature matching between an acquired photograph and a synthesised rendering of the orientated 3D scene as input for fine alignment. The paper also introduces a user-friendly manual camera registration- and pose estimation interface for mobile devices, based on existing surface geometry and numerical optimisation methods. The article further assesses the automatic algorithm’s accuracy compared to traditional methods, and the impact of computational- and environmental parameters. Experiments using urban and geological case studies show a significant sensitivity of the automatic procedure to the quality of the initial mobile sensor values. Changing natural lighting conditions remain a challenge for automatic pose estimation techniques, although progress is presented here. Finally, the automatically-registered mobile images are used as the basis for adding user annotations to the input textured model.

[1]  T. Van Damme,et al.  Computer Vision Photogrammetry for Underwater Archaeological Site Recording in a Low-Visibility Environment , 2015 .

[2]  Paolo Cignoni,et al.  Mutual Correspondences: An Hybrid Method for Image-to-geometry Registration , 2010, Eurographics Italian Chapter Conference.

[3]  Luc Van Gool,et al.  SURF: Speeded Up Robust Features , 2006, ECCV.

[4]  Paul A. Viola,et al.  Alignment by Maximization of Mutual Information , 1997, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[5]  R. Gawthorpe,et al.  LiDAR-based digital outcrops for sedimentological analysis: workflows and techniques , 2013 .

[6]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  Roger Y. Tsai,et al.  A versatile camera calibration technique for high-accuracy 3D machine vision metrology using off-the-shelf TV cameras and lenses , 1987, IEEE J. Robotics Autom..

[8]  Danilo Schneider,et al.  AN IMPROVED WORKFLOW FOR IMAGE- AND LASER-BASED VIRTUAL GEOLOGICAL OUTCROP MODELLING , 2013 .

[9]  Mateu Sbert,et al.  A unified information-theoretic framework for viewpoint selection and mesh saliency , 2009, TAP.

[10]  G LoweDavid,et al.  Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2004 .

[11]  Jürgen Döllner,et al.  Interactive image filtering for level-of-abstraction texturing of virtual 3D scenes , 2015, Comput. Graph..

[12]  S. Buckley,et al.  Terrestrial laser scanning in geology: data acquisition, processing and accuracy considerations , 2008, Journal of the Geological Society.

[13]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Mutual-information-based registration of medical images: a survey , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[14]  Jeremy R. Cooperstock,et al.  Smartphone Sensor Reliability for Augmented Reality Applications , 2012, MobiQuitous.

[15]  John A. Howell,et al.  Combining Aerial Photogrammetry and Terrestrial Lidar for Reservoir Analog Modeling , 2010 .

[16]  Roberto Scopigno,et al.  3DHOP: 3D Heritage Online Presenter , 2015, Comput. Graph..

[17]  Michael Cohen,et al.  Interactive Techniques for Registering Images to Digital Terrain and Building Models , 2008 .

[18]  Michael Arens,et al.  Accurate Single Image Multi-modal Camera Pose Estimation , 2010, ECCV Workshops.

[19]  V. Lepetit,et al.  EPnP: An Accurate O(n) Solution to the PnP Problem , 2009, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[20]  Guido Brunnett,et al.  Geometric Modeling for Scientific Visualization , 2010 .

[21]  Per-Erik Forssén,et al.  Maximally Stable Colour Regions for Recognition and Matching , 2007, 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[22]  Ruggero Pintus,et al.  Fast and Robust Semi-Automatic Registration of Photographs to 3D Geometry , 2011, VAST.

[23]  Long Quan,et al.  Linear N-Point Camera Pose Determination , 1999, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[24]  Didier Stricker,et al.  Markerless Camera Pose Estimation - An Overview , 2010, VLUDS.

[25]  Roberto Scopigno,et al.  Fully Automatic Registration of Image Sets on Approximate Geometry , 2012, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[26]  Aleksandra Anna Sima,et al.  Optimizing SIFT for Matching of Short Wave Infrared and Visible Wavelength Images , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[27]  John A. Howell,et al.  The application of outcrop analogues in geological modelling: a review, present status and future outlook , 2014 .

[28]  Aruna Seneviratne,et al.  Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Computing, Networking, and Services , 2010, Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering.