Evaluating Contextual Variables Affecting Productivity Using Data Envelopment Analysis

A DEA-based stochastic frontier estimation framework is presented to evaluate contextual variables affecting productivity that allows for both one-sided inefficiency deviations as well as two-sided random noise. Conditions are identified under which a two-stage procedure consisting of DEA followed by ordinary least squares (OLS) regression analysis yields consistent estimators of the impact of contextual variables. Conditions are also identified under which DEA in the first stage followed by maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) in the second stage yields consistent estimators of the impact of contextual variables. This requires the contextual variables to be independent of the input variables, but the contextual variables may be correlated with each other. Monte Carlo simulations are carried out to compare the performance of our two-stage approach with one-stage and two-stage parametric approaches. Simulation results indicate that DEA-based procedures with OLS, maximum likelihood, or even Tobit estimation in the second stage perform as well as the best of the parametric methods in the estimation of the impact of contextual variables on productivity. Simulation results also indicate that DEA-based procedures perform better than parametric methods in the estimation of individual decision-making unit (DMU) productivity. Overall, the results establish DEA as a nonparametric stochastic frontier estimation (SFE) methodology.

[1]  M. D. Wilkinson,et al.  Management science , 1989, British Dental Journal.

[2]  Peter Schmidt,et al.  A Monte Carlo study of estimators of stochastic frontier production functions , 1980 .

[3]  John Ruggiero,et al.  Efficiency measurement in the stochastic frontier model , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  D. Neeleman,et al.  A Monte-Carlo study , 1973 .

[5]  M. Farrell.  The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[6]  W. Greene.  Maximum likelihood estimation of econometric frontier functions , 1980 .

[7]  W. Greene,et al.  计量经济分析 = Econometric analysis , 2009 .

[8]  W. Meeusen,et al.  Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error , 1977 .

[9]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes , 2007 .

[10]  Subhash C. Ray,et al.  Resource-Use Efficiency in Public Schools: A Study of Connecticut Data , 1991 .

[11]  R. Banker,et al.  A Monte Carlo comparison of two production frontier estimation methods: Corrected ordinary least squares and data envelopment analysis , 1993 .

[12]  W. Greene.  Frontier Production Functions , 1993 .

[13]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Evaluating the Adequacy of Parametric Functional Forms in Estimating Monotone and Concave Production Functions , 2002 .

[14]  A. U.S.,et al.  FORMULATION AND ESTIMATION OF STOCHASTIC FRONTIER PRODUCTION FUNCTION MODELS , 2001 .

[15]  P. Schmidt.  On the Statistical Estimation of Parametric Frontier Production Functions , 1976 .

[16]  Kaliappa Kalirajan,et al.  On Measuring the Contribution of Human Capital to Agricultural Production , 1989 .

[17]  C. Lovell,et al.  On the estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model , 1982 .

[18]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[19]  Peter Schmidt,et al.  One-Step and Two-Step Estimation of the Effects of Exogenous Variables on Technical Efficiency Levels , 2002 .

[20]  Dieter Gstach,et al.  Another Approach to Data Envelopment Analysis in Noisy Environments: DEA+ , 1998 .

[21]  Lung-fei Lee,et al.  The measurement and sources of technical inefficiency in the Indonesian weaving industry , 1981 .

[22]  S. Grosskopf.  Statistical inference and nonparametric efficiency: A selective survey , 1996 .

[23]  D. Aigner,et al.  P. Schmidt, 1977,?Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models,? , 1977 .

[24]  R. Banker.  Maximum likelihood, consistency and data envelopment analysis: a statistical foundation , 1993 .

[25]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  A simulation study of DEA and parametric frontier models in the presence of heteroscedasticity , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[26]  L. Goddard,et al.  Operations Research (OR) , 2007 .