Motivation of Computer Science Students at Universities Organized around Small Groups

The academic performance of students is affected by the academic context, their aptitudes and their motivation. The latter is particularly important in Engineering disciplines because the contents to be learnt are especially complex and many students end up having a low performance that leads them to absenteeism and drop out. The European Higher Education Area (EHEA) provides several recommendations related to the academic context (ongoing assessment, mentoring processes and active learning methods among others) that seem to have a positive impact on the students’ motivation. However, these cannot always be implemented due to the high number of students per class existing at many Universities. This contribution presents an empirical case study performed with 149 Computer Science students of a University organized around small groups and innovative educational methodologies. The benefits and outcomes of this academic conditions, as well as their impact in the students’ motivation, are analyzed and discussed.

[1]  Ali H. Dogru,et al.  Application of Project-Based Learning in a Theoretical Course: Process, Difficulties and Recommendations , 2012 .

[2]  Abandono de primer año en la Ingeniería Informática , 2014 .

[3]  Alexander Bartel,et al.  The furtherance of motivation in the context of teaching software engineering , 2013, 2013 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON).

[4]  Irene Rothe.  How to handle large classrooms of engineering students: Two more applied methods/practices including a personal report , 2017, 2017 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON).

[5]  Lisa Benson,et al.  Quantitative assessment of student motivation to characterize differences between engineering majors , 2013, 2013 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).

[6]  Edmundo Tovar Caro,et al.  Motivation in engineering education: a framework supported by evaluation instruments and enhancement resources , 2015, EDUCON 2015.

[7]  Jesse Fox,et al.  Assessing the effects of gamification in the classroom: A longitudinal study on intrinsic motivation, social comparison, satisfaction, effort, and academic performance , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[8]  U. Zoller.  Faculty Teaching Performance Evaluation in Higher Science Education: Issues and Implications (A “Cross‐Cultural” Case Study) , 1992 .

[9]  Inmaculada Plaza,et al.  Are engineering students decreasing? A Spanish case study , 2011, 2011 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON).

[10]  Archie C. Chapman,et al.  A Project-Based Cooperative Approach to Teaching Sustainable Energy Systems , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[11]  Michael J. Prince,et al.  Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases , 2006 .

[12]  Jose Alberto Naves Cocota,et al.  Development of tangible experiments for motivating undergraduate students , 2013, 2013 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON).

[13]  Victoria Lapuerta,et al.  Socio-emotional competences at university: optimization of learning and professional competitiveness of engineering students , 2015 .

[14]  S. Zabell,et al.  On Student's 1908 Article “The Probable Error of a Mean” , 2008 .

[15]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[16]  Mario Munoz-Organero,et al.  Motivation and Emotions in Competition Systems for Education: An Empirical Study , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Education.