Comparison of spirometric parameters in athletes engaged in aerobic and anaerobic sports: a cross-sectional study

Background: Pulmonary function tests are better among athletes than non-athletes. The spirometry parameters may vary among athletes involved in aerobic and anaerobic sports. This study aims to study the difference in spirometry parameters among aerobic and anaerobic sports athletes. Materials and methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted among 131 professional athletes. A convenience sampling technique was used. The data were collected from April to November 2022 using a proforma form, entered into Microsoft Excel, and analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 16. Results: Out of 131 total participants, 65 were involved in aerobic sports, while 66 were in anaerobic sports. The mean age of the participants was 27.34±5 years, the majority being male (n=104). Aerobic athletes had higher differences in forced vital capacity (1.19%, P=0.726) and forced expiratory volume in the first second (3.08%, P=0.315), the difference was not statistically significant. Statistically significantly higher difference in forced expiratory flow at 25–75% (13.42%, P=0.001), forced expiratory flow at 0.2–1.2 l/s (7.47%, P=0.035), and maximum voluntary ventilation (8.58%, P=0.023) values were observed among aerobic athletes. Conclusion: Aerobic and anaerobic athletes had no statistically significant difference in forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in the first second; however, other spirometry parameters were comparatively better in aerobic athletes.

[1]  D. Hackett Lung Function and Respiratory Muscle Adaptations of Endurance- and Strength-Trained Males , 2020, Sports.

[2]  J. Aronson,et al.  STROCSS 2019 Guideline: Strengthening the Reporting of Cohort Studies in Surgery. , 2019, International journal of surgery.

[3]  Kevin McCarthy,et al.  Standardization of Spirometry 2019 Update. An Official American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society Technical Statement , 2019, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[4]  A. Pressler,et al.  Recommendations for participation in competitive sports of athletes with arterial hypertension: a position statement from the sports cardiology section of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC). , 2018, European heart journal.

[5]  F. Rasmussen,et al.  Does physical fitness enhance lung function in children and young adults? , 2018, European Respiratory Journal.

[6]  V. Žugić,et al.  Comparison of lung diffusing capacity in young elite athletes and their counterparts. , 2017, Revista portuguesa de pneumologia.

[7]  R. Agha,et al.  A protocol for the development of the STROCSS guideline: Strengthening the Reporting of Cohort Studies in Surgery , 2017, International journal of surgery protocols.

[8]  T. Durmić,et al.  The training type influence on male elite athletes’ ventilatory function , 2017, BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine.

[9]  N. Mahotra,et al.  Effects of exercise on pulmonary function tests: A comparative study between athletes and non-athletes in Nepalese settings , 2017 .

[10]  S. Mazič,et al.  Respiratory adaptations in different types of sport. , 2015, European review for medical and pharmacological sciences.

[11]  L. Ayvazian Principles of Exercise Testing and Interpretation , 2015 .

[12]  Jung E. Park,et al.  The Effect of Body Composition on Pulmonary Function , 2012, Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases.

[13]  M. A.,et al.  Effect of traditional aerobic exercises versus sprint interval training on pulmonary function tests in young sedentary males: a randomised controlled trial. , 2013, Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR.