Metacontrast masking and stimulus contrast polarity

A recent report [Becker, M. W., & Anstis S. (2004). Metacontrast masking is specific to luminance polarity. Vision Research, 44, 2537-2543] of a failure to obtain metacontrast with target and mask stimuli of opposite contrast polarity is reexamined in an experiment that systematically varies not only stimulus contrast polarity but also target size and target-mask onset asynchrony (SOA). The results show that (a) although, as previously shown [Breitmeyer, B. G. (1978a). Metacontrast with black and white stimuli: Evidence of inhibition of on and off sustained activity by either on or off transient activity. Vision Research, 18, 1443-1448], metacontrast is weaker with stimuli of opposite contrast polarity, (b) substantial metacontrast can be obtained with targets and masks of opposite contrast polarity, especially (c) when the target is small. We conclude that Becker and Anstis's failure to obtain metacontrast with stimuli of opposite contrast polarity is due to their use of a single, relatively large, SOA value.

[1]  Mark W. Becker,et al.  Metacontrast masking is specific to luminance polarity , 2004, Vision Research.

[2]  M. Livingstone,et al.  Neuronal correlates of visibility and invisibility in the primate visual system , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  B. Breitmeyer.  Metacontrast with black and white stimuli: Evidence for inhibition of on- and off-sustained activity by either on- or off-transient activity , 1978, Vision Research.

[4]  P. Schiller,et al.  Quantitative studies of single-cell properties in monkey striate cortex. III. Spatial frequency. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  Haluk Öğmen,et al.  Meta- and paracontrast reveal differences between contour- and brightness-processing mechanisms , 2006, Vision Research.

[6]  Journal of the Optical Society of America , 1950, Nature.

[7]  B. Dow.  Functional classes of cells and their laminar distribution in monkey visual cortex. , 1974, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  Bruno G. Breitmeyer,et al.  Metacontrast masking as a function of mask energy , 1978 .

[9]  Talis Bachmann,et al.  Luminance processing in object substitution masking , 2008, Vision Research.

[10]  G. Francis,et al.  Analysis and test of laws for backward (metacontrast) masking. , 2004, Spatial vision.

[11]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Competition for consciousness among visual events: the psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[12]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  P. Schiller,et al.  Quantitative studies of single-cell properties in monkey striate cortex. V. Multivariate statistical analyses and models. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  B G Breitmeyer,et al.  Backward masking by pattern stimulus offset. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  W N Dember,et al.  Metacontrast with black and white stimuli. , 1974, Canadian journal of psychology.

[16]  B. Breitmeyer,et al.  Recent models and findings in visual backward masking: A comparison, review, and update , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  K. Jellinger.  Visual Masking – Time Slices through Conscious and Unconscious Vision, 2nd edn. , 2009 .

[18]  P. H. Schiller.  Central connections of the retinal ON and OFF pathways , 1982, Nature.