Animal choice behavior and the evolution of cognitive architecture

Animals process sensory information according to specific computational rules and, subsequently, form representations of their environments that form the basis for decisions and choices. The specific computational rules used by organisms will often be evolutionarily adaptive by generating higher probabilities of survival, reproduction, and resource acquisition. Experiments with enclosed colonies of bumblebees constrained to foraging on artificial flowers suggest that the bumblebee's cognitive architecture is designed to efficiently exploit floral resources from spatially structured environments given limits on memory and the neuronal processing of information. A non-linear relationship between the biomechanics of nectar extraction and rates of net energetic gain by individual bees may account for sensitivities to both the arithmetic mean and variance in reward distributions in flowers. Heuristic rules that lead to efficient resource exploitation may also lead to subjective misperception of likelihoods. Subjective probability formation may then be viewed as a problem in pattern recognition subject to specific sampling schemes and memory constraints.

[1]  E. Rowland Theory of Games and Economic Behavior , 1946, Nature.

[2]  G. Criscenti [Sanarelli-Schwartzmann phenomenon in the esophagus]. , 1954, L'Oto-rino-laringologia italiana.

[3]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[4]  J. Tobin Liquidity Preference as Behavior towards Risk , 1958 .

[5]  S. Goldhor Ecology , 1964, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[6]  R. Herrnstein APERIODICITY AS A FACTOR IN CHOICE. , 1964, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[7]  M. Yaari Convexity in the Theory of Choice under Risk , 1965 .

[8]  D. J. White,et al.  Decision Theory , 2018, Behavioral Finance for Private Banking.

[9]  M. Davison Preference for mixed-interval versus fixed-interval schedules. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[10]  R. N. Rosett Weak Experimental Verification of the Expected Utility Hypothesis , 1971 .

[11]  Elizabeth C. Hirschman,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[12]  P. Feinsinger ECOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS BETWEEN PLANTS AND HUMMINGBIRDS IN A SUCCESSIONAL TROPICAL COMMUNITY , 1978 .

[13]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[14]  Randolf Menzel,et al.  Behavioural access to short-term memory in bees , 1979, Nature.

[15]  T. Caraco,et al.  An empirical demonstration of risk-sensitive foraging preferences , 1980, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  B. Heinrich,et al.  Floral preferences of bumblebees (Bombus edwardsii) in relation to intermittent versus continuous rewards , 1981, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  L. Real UNCERTAINTY AND POLLINATOR-PLANT INTERACTIONS: THE FORAGING BEHAVIOR OF BEES AND WASPS ON ARTIFICIAL FLOWERS' , 1981 .

[18]  H. Roitblat The meaning of representation in animal memory , 1982, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[19]  M. Machina "Expected Utility" Analysis without the Independence Axiom , 1982 .

[20]  Nolan E. Pearson,et al.  The Fallacy of the Traffic Policeman: A Response to Templeton and Lawlor , 1982, The American Naturalist.

[21]  T. Schoener,et al.  The Fallacy of the Fallacy of the Averages in Ecological Optimization Theory , 1982, The American Naturalist.

[22]  L. Real,et al.  On the Tradeoff Between the Mean and the Variance in Foraging: Effect of Spatial Distribution and Color Preference , 1982 .

[23]  I. Swingland,et al.  The Ecology of Animal Movement , 1985 .

[24]  P.N.J. Mackintosh Adaptive Behavior and Learning, J.E.R. Staddon. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1984), xiii, +555. Price £30.00 hardback, £10.95 paperback , 1984 .

[25]  J. Krebs,et al.  Lagging Partial Preferences for Cryptic Prey: A Signal Detection Analysis of Great Tit Foraging , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[26]  J. Kagel,et al.  Animals' Choices over Uncertain Outcomes: Some Initial Experimental Results , 1985 .

[27]  T. Getty Discriminability and the Sigmoid Functional Response: How Optimal Foragers Could Stabilize Model-Mimic Complexes , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[28]  James L. McClelland,et al.  James L. McClelland, David Rumelhart and the PDP Research Group, Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition . Vol. 1. Foundations . Vol. 2. Psychological and biological models . Cambridge MA: M.I.T. Press, 1987. , 1989, Journal of Child Language.

[29]  George Apostolakis,et al.  Decision theory , 1986 .

[30]  N. Waser Flower Constancy: Definition, Cause, and Measurement , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[31]  R. Seyfarth,et al.  Social relationships and social cognition in nonhuman primates. , 1986, Science.

[32]  T. Caraco,et al.  RISK AND FORAGING IN STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTS , 1986 .

[33]  M. Dawkins,et al.  Darwin and the Emergence of Evolutionary Theories of Mind and Behavior , 1988 .

[34]  J. Pearce Introduction to animal cognition , 1987 .

[35]  L. Real Objective Benefit Versus Subjective Perception in the Theory of Risk-Sensitive Foraging , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[36]  D. Schacter,et al.  The Evolution of Multiple Memory Systems , 1987 .

[37]  L. Real,et al.  Why are Bumble Bees Risk Averse , 1987 .

[38]  John R. Anderson Methodologies for studying human knowledge , 1987, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[39]  E. Macphail The comparative psychology of intelligence. , 1987 .

[40]  A. Kamil,et al.  A comparative study of cache recovery by three corvid species , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[41]  C. Gallistel Animal cognition: the representation of space, time and number. , 1989, Annual review of psychology.

[42]  A. Houston,et al.  Risk‐Averse Foraging in Bees: A Comment on the Mode of Harder and Real , 1990 .

[43]  S. Healy,et al.  Spatial memory of paridae: comparison of a storing and a non-storing species, the coal tit, Parus ater, and the great tit, P. major , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[44]  J. Krebs,et al.  Starlings exploiting patches: the effect of recent experience on foraging decisions , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[45]  L. Real,et al.  Short-Term Energy Maximization and Risk-Aversion in Bumble Bees: A Reply to Possingham Et Al. , 1990 .

[46]  D. Loria,et al.  Energy demands of migration on red-eyed vireos, Vireo olivaceus , 1990 .

[47]  R. Seyfarth,et al.  The representation of social relations by monkeys , 1990, Cognition.

[48]  J. Kagel,et al.  Tests of 'fanning out' of indifference curves: Results from animal and human experiments , 1990 .

[49]  H. Raiffa,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives , 1993 .