Reasons and predictors of non-participation in a personalized digital prehabilitation care trial for patients undergoing elective cardiothoracic surgery

Abstract OBJECTIVES Prehabilitation through a digital platform could preoperatively improve the physical and mental fitness of patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery, thereby improving treatment outcomes. This study aimed to describe the reasons and predictors of non-participation in a personalized digital prehabilitation care trial (Digital Cardiac Counseling randomized controlled trial) for patients undergoing elective cardiothoracic surgery. METHODS Adult patients scheduled for elective cardiothoracic surgery at the Maastricht University Medical Center+ were approached to participate in a digital prehabilitation care trial, in which patients were informed about their care pathway, monitored for symptom progression and screened for preoperative modifiable risk factors. Baseline characteristics of all eligible patients and reasons of non-participation were registered prospectively. Predictors of non-participation were determined using logistic regression. RESULTS Between May 2020 and August 2022, 815 patients were eligible for participation; 421 (52%) did not participate in the personalized digital prehabilitation care trial. Reasons for non-participation were ‘lack of internet access or insufficient digital skills’ (32%), ‘wishing no participation’ (39%) and ‘other reasons’ (30%; e.g. vision or hearing impairments, analphabetism, language barriers). Independent predictors of non-participation were age [odds ratio (OR) 1.024 (1.003–1.046), P = 0.024], socioeconomic status [OR 0.267 (0.133–0.536), P < 0.001], current smoker [OR 1.823 (1.124–2.954), P = 0.015] and EuroSCORE II [OR 1.160 (1.042–1.292), P = 0.007]. CONCLUSIONS Half of the eligible patients did not participate in a personalized digital prehabilitation care trial. Non-participants were vulnerable patients, with a more unfavourable risk profile and more modifiable risk factors, who could potentially benefit the most from prehabilitation.

[1]  Tim Fabian Schaffland,et al.  Efficacy of Prehabilitation Before Cardiac Surgery , 2022, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[2]  J. Ehlers,et al.  Approaches to Improvement of Digital Health Literacy (eHL) in the Context of Person-Centered Care , 2022, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[3]  R. Brouwers,et al.  Predictors of non-participation in a cardiac telerehabilitation programme: a prospective analysis , 2021, European heart journal. Digital health.

[4]  J. Gómez‐Salgado,et al.  Effects of Prehabilitation on Functional Capacity in Aged Patients Undergoing Cardiothoracic Surgeries: A Systematic Review , 2021, Healthcare.

[5]  Peter C. Black,et al.  Taking Advantage of the Teachable Moment at Initial Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer—Results of a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Supervised Exercise Training , 2021, Cancer nursing.

[6]  J. Maessen,et al.  Personalized teleprehabilitation in elective cardiac surgery: a study protocol of the Digital Cardiac Counselling randomized controlled trial , 2021, European heart journal. Digital health.

[7]  V. Shi,et al.  Facilitating Clinical Trials Participation of Low Socioeconomic Status Patients , 2020, Dermatology.

[8]  F. Carli,et al.  Teleprehabilitation during COVID-19 pandemic: the essentials of “what” and “how” , 2020, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[9]  T. Walther,et al.  Prehabilitation in patients awaiting elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery – effects on functional capacity and quality of life: a randomized controlled trial , 2020, Clinical rehabilitation.

[10]  M. Underwood,et al.  Effect of preparative rehabilitation on recovery after cardiac surgery: a systematic review. , 2020, Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine.

[11]  J. Silver Prehabilitation could save lives in a pandemic , 2020, BMJ.

[12]  F. Sniehotta,et al.  Exploring patient attitudes to behaviour change before surgery to reduce peri‐operative risk: preferences for short‐ vs. long‐term behaviour change , 2019, Anaesthesia.

[13]  E. Akowuah,et al.  Does prehabilitation improve outcomes in cardiac surgical patients? , 2019, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

[14]  S. van den Broucke,et al.  Does health literacy mediate the relationship between socioeconomic status and health disparities? Integrative review. , 2018, Health promotion international.

[15]  M. Rubio-Valera,et al.  Factors associated with non-participation in and dropout from cardiac rehabilitation programmes: a systematic review of prospective cohort studies , 2018, European journal of cardiovascular nursing : journal of the Working Group on Cardiovascular Nursing of the European Society of Cardiology.

[16]  Dirk De Bacquer,et al.  Determinants of participation and risk factor control according to attendance in cardiac rehabilitation programmes in coronary patients in Europe: EUROASPIRE IV survey , 2018, European journal of preventive cardiology.

[17]  Alberto Ruano-Ravina,et al.  Participation and adherence to cardiac rehabilitation programs. A systematic review. , 2016, International journal of cardiology.

[18]  G Ardine de Wit,et al.  Dutch Tariff for the Five-Level Version of EQ-5D. , 2016, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[19]  F. Carli,et al.  Optimization of surgical outcomes with prehabilitation. , 2015, Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme.

[20]  Stef van Buuren,et al.  MICE: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R , 2011 .

[21]  J. Ralston,et al.  Patient Ability and Willingness to Participate in a Web-Based Intervention to Improve Hypertension Control , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.

[22]  Ian Harvey,et al.  Patients' Self-Assessed Functional Status in Heart Failure by New York Heart Association Class: A Prognostic Predictor of Hospitalizations, Quality of Life and Death , 2010, Journal of cardiac failure.

[23]  G. Dagenais,et al.  Assessment of activity status and survival according to the Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina classification. , 2009, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[24]  R. D. de Bie,et al.  Preoperative intensive inspiratory muscle training to prevent postoperative pulmonary complications in high-risk patients undergoing CABG surgery: a randomized clinical trial. , 2006, JAMA.

[25]  J. Seidell,et al.  Development and validation of a hospital screening tool for malnutrition: the short nutritional assessment questionnaire (SNAQ). , 2005, Clinical nutrition.

[26]  Huston Gj,et al.  The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. , 1987, The Journal of rheumatology.

[27]  Tam Hoang Minh,et al.  Trends in isolated coronary artery bypass grafting over the last decade. , 2017, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

[28]  Samer A M Nashef,et al.  EuroSCORE II. , 2012, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.