Evaluation of Virtual Keyboards for Interactive Digital Television Applications

The development of the technologies behind Interactive Digital Television (IDTV) services has produced a new type of audience. Traditional viewers now become users as they may play an active role in front of the TV, for example, by choosing a video to be played on demand or by introducing text on an IDTV application. In these services, interactions need to be performed with a remote control, currently the main interaction device, or other devices such as keyboards or mice, which are not very popular in this environment. Nevertheless, although remote controls are essential tools for IDTV services, they are very limited when it comes to writing text. Thus, this study evaluated different alternatives to introduce text on an IDTV application with a remote control. A heterogeneous group of people was selected to write predefined sentences in Spanish in a test environment using three virtual keyboard layouts and the multitap mechanism. Their performance and subjective impressions reveal weaknesses and strengths of the evaluated methods. The article draws important conclusions about the usage of remote controls in IDTV applications, not only for the design of new applications but also for the research of new techniques to introduce text.

[1]  Sang D. Choi,et al.  Study of Computer Input Devices and Older Users , 2009 .

[2]  I. Scott MacKenzie.  CHAPTER 4 – Evaluation of Text Entry Techniques , 2007 .

[3]  Daniel J. Wigdor,et al.  A comparison of consecutive and concurrent input text entry techniques for mobile phones , 2004, CHI.

[4]  Shumin Zhai,et al.  Performance Optimization of Virtual Keyboards , 2002, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[5]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  Interactive TV for the Home: An Ethnographic Study on Users' Requirements and Experiences , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[6]  Other.  Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Annual Policy Strategy for 2008 , 2007 .

[7]  Dzmitry Aliakseyeu,et al.  Comparing text entry methods for interactive television applications , 2009, EuroITV '09.

[8]  Arianna Iatrino,et al.  Text Editing in Digital Terrestrial Television: A Comparison of Three Interfaces , 2007 .

[9]  Shumin Zhai,et al.  TNT: a numeric keypad based text input method , 2004, CHI '04.

[10]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  A Probabilistic Character Layout Strategy for Mobile Text Entry , 1998, Graphics Interface.

[11]  R. Leach.  The learning curve , 1992 .

[12]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  A comparison of two input methods for keypads on mobile devices , 2004, NordiCHI '04.

[13]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  LetterWise: prefix-based disambiguation for mobile text input , 2001, UIST '01.

[14]  Julie A. Jacko,et al.  Multimodal Feedback as a Solution to Ocular Disease-Based User Performance Decrements in the Absence of Functional Visual Loss , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[15]  Ian Mackenzie,et al.  Fitts' law as a performance model in human-computer interaction , 1992 .

[16]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Text Entry for Mobile Computing: Models and Methods,Theory and Practice , 2002, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[17]  Shumin Zhai,et al.  The metropolis keyboard - an exploration of quantitative techniques for virtual keyboard design , 2000, UIST '00.

[18]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Predicting text entry speed on mobile phones , 2000, CHI.

[19]  Kumiko Tanaka-Ishii,et al.  Text Entry Using a Small Number of Buttons , 2007 .

[20]  Chad Brewbaker,et al.  Optimizing stylus keyboard layouts with a genetic algorithm : customization and internationalization , 2005 .