Sensor Placement Optimization in Structural Health Monitoring Using Niching Monkey Algorithm

Optimal sensor placement (OSP) method plays a key role in setting up a health monitoring system for large-scale structures. This paper describes the implementation of monkey algorithm (MA) as a strategy for the optimal placement of a predefined number of sensors. To effectively maintain the population diversity while enhancing the exploitation capacities during the optimization process, a novel niching monkey algorithm (NMA) by combining the MA with the niching techniques is developed in this paper. In the NMA, the dual-structure coding method is adopted to code the design variables and a chaos-based approach instead of a pure random initialization is employed to initialize the monkey population. Meanwhile, the niche generation operation and fitness sharing mechanism are modified and incorporated to alleviate the premature convergence problem while enhancing the exploration of new search domain. In addition, to promote interactions and share the available resources, the replacement scheme is proposed and adopted among the niches. Finally, numerical experiments are conducted on a high-rise structure to evaluate the performance of the proposed NMA. It is found that the innovations in the proposed NMA can effectively improve the convergence of algorithm and generate superior sensor configurations when compared to the original MA.

[1]  Richard G. Cobb,et al.  Sensor Placement and Structural Damage Identification from Minimal Sensor Information , 1997 .

[2]  S. LynchChristopher,et al.  リラクサ強誘電体8/65/35PLZTとオルセンサイクルを用いる焦電廃熱エネルギー回収 | 文献情報 | J-GLOBAL 科学技術総合リンクセンター , 2012 .

[3]  Bogdan I. Epureanu,et al.  Sensor Placement for Damage Detection in Nonlinear Systems using System Augmentations , 2007 .

[4]  Norris Stubbs,et al.  Optimal Sensor Placement for Mode Shapes Via Shannon's Sampling Theorem , 1996 .

[5]  Daniel C. Kammer Sensor placement for on-orbit modal identification and correlation of large space structures , 1991 .

[6]  Dongsheng Li,et al.  The connection between effective independence and modal kinetic energy methods for sensor placement , 2007 .

[7]  Shankar Narasimhan,et al.  Sensor network design for maximizing reliability of linear processes , 1993 .

[8]  T. T. Soong,et al.  STRUCTURAL CONTROL: PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE , 1997 .

[9]  Hongnan Li,et al.  A new method for optimal selection of sensor location on a high-rise building using simplified finite element model , 2011 .

[10]  Kai-Yuen Wong,et al.  Instrumentation and health monitoring of cable‐supported bridges , 2004 .

[11]  Ting-Hua Yi,et al.  Optimal sensor placement for structural health monitoring based on multiple optimization strategies , 2011 .

[12]  A. Rama Mohan Rao,et al.  Optimal sensor placement techniques for system identification and health monitoring of civil structures , 2008 .

[13]  Ting-Hua Yi,et al.  Recent research and applications of GPS‐based monitoring technology for high‐rise structures , 2013 .

[14]  Filipe Magalhães,et al.  Recent perspectives in dynamic testing and monitoring of bridges , 2013 .

[15]  A. Dočekal,et al.  Detecting dominant resonant modes of rolling bearing faults using the niching genetic algorithm , 2011 .

[16]  A. Will,et al.  On the use of niching genetic algorithms for variable selection in solar radiation estimation , 2013 .

[17]  Keith Worden,et al.  Optimal sensor placement for fault detection , 2001 .

[18]  Mircea Grigoriu,et al.  Optimal design of sensor networks for vehicle detection, classification, and monitoring , 2006 .

[19]  Mohammad Saleh Tavazoei,et al.  Comparison of different one-dimensional maps as chaotic search pattern in chaos optimization algorithms , 2007, Appl. Math. Comput..

[20]  D. Satpathi,et al.  Optimal transducer placement for health monitoring of long span bridge , 1997 .

[21]  Michael L. Tinker,et al.  Optimal placement of triaxial accelerometers for modal vibration tests , 2002 .

[22]  S. S. Law,et al.  Optimum sensor placement for structural damage detection , 2000 .