A Comparison of the General Linear Mixed Model and Repeated Measures ANOVA Using a Dataset with Multiple Missing Data Points

Longitudinal methods are the methods of choice for researchers who view their phenomena of interest as dynamic. Although statistical methods have remained largely fixed in a linear view of biology and behavior, more recent methods, such as the general linear mixed model (mixed model), can be used to analyze dynamic phenomena that are often of interest to nurses. Two strengths of the mixed model are (1) the ability to accommodate missing data points often encountered in longitudinal datasets and (2) the ability to model nonlinear, individual characteristics. The purpose of this article is to demonstrate the advantages of using the mixed model for analyzing nonlinear, longitudinal datasets with multiple missing data points by comparing the mixed model to the widely used repeated measures ANOVA using an experimental set of data. The decision-making steps in analyzing the data using both the mixed model and the repeated measures ANOVA are described.

[1]  G. Gottlieb.  Epigenetic Systems View of Human Development. , 1991 .

[2]  Gilbert Gottlieb,et al.  Normally occurring environmental and behavioral influences on gene activity: From central dogma to probabilistic epigenesis. , 1998 .

[3]  J. Singer,et al.  The design and analysis of longitudinal studies of development and psychopathology in context: Statistical models and methodological recommendations , 1998, Development and Psychopathology.

[4]  P S Albert,et al.  Longitudinal data analysis (repeated measures) in clinical trials. , 1999, Statistics in medicine.

[5]  H. Prechtl,et al.  Are there behavioural states in the human fetus? , 1982, Early human development.

[6]  G S Dawes,et al.  A comparison of ultrasound (with autocorrelation) and direct electrocardiogram fetal heart rate detector systems. , 1983, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  Nan M. Laird,et al.  Using the General Linear Mixed Model to Analyse Unbalanced Repeated Measures and Longitudinal Data , 1997 .

[8]  P. Loizou,et al.  High vagal tone is associated with more efficient regulation of homeostasis in low-risk human fetuses. , 1999, Developmental psychobiology.

[9]  G Gottlieb,et al.  Normally occurring environmental and behavioral influences on gene activity: from central dogma to probabilistic epigenesis. , 1998, Psychological review.

[10]  T R Johnson,et al.  Fetal neurobehavioral development. , 1996, Child development.

[11]  D. Arduini,et al.  The development of fetal behavioural states: A longitudinal study , 1986, Prenatal diagnosis.

[12]  James R. Kenyon,et al.  Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Repeated Measurements , 2003, Technometrics.

[13]  Jaan Valsiner,et al.  The Individual subject and scientific psychology , 1986 .

[14]  R. Wolfinger,et al.  An example of using mixed models and PROC MIXED for longitudinal data. , 1997, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[15]  L. Edwards.  Modern statistical techniques for the analysis of longitudinal data in biomedical research , 2000, Pediatric pulmonology.

[16]  L. Edwards,et al.  Modeling Development of Sleep–Wake Behaviors. II. Results of Two Cohorts of Preterms , 1998, Physiology & Behavior.

[17]  Ana Ivelisse Avilés,et al.  Linear Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data , 2001, Technometrics.

[18]  Y. W. Wu.  An application of hierarchical linear models to longitudinal studies. , 1996, Research in nursing & health.

[19]  Yow-wu B. Wu.  An application of hierarchical linear methods to longitudinal studies , 1996 .