The internet of toys

ABSTRACT The Internet of Toys refers to a future where toys not only relate one-on-one to children but are wirelessly connected to other toys and/or database data. While existing toy companies and start-ups are eagerly innovating in this area, problems involving data hacking and other privacy issues have already occurred. The Hello Barbie and VTech hacks in late 2015 are recent examples. This article reviews, outlines, and analyses these recent advances in children’s engagement with the Internet. It shows how Internet-connected toys, among other data-inducing practices (such as baby wearables and school analytics), are implicated in big data processes that are datafying a generation of youngsters. Significant issues exist around the data security and safety of The Internet of Toys for child consumers who are usually too young to fully understand and consent to data collection or to understand other security issues.

[1]  Romit Roy Choudhury,et al.  Injecting life into toys , 2014, HotMobile.

[2]  Stefan Schmid,et al.  Connecting networks of toys and smartphones with visible light communication , 2014, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[3]  Andrea La Nauze,et al.  Corporate paedophilia: the sexualisation of children in Australia , 2006 .

[4]  V. Steeves.  It's Not Child's Play: The Online Invasion of Children's Privacy , 2007 .

[5]  Owain Jones,et al.  Editorial: Surveillance, Children and Childhood , 2010 .

[6]  Cees J. Hamelink,et al.  The State of the Right to Communicate , 2008 .

[7]  Sonia Livingstone,et al.  A Global Research Agenda for Children's Rights in the Digital Age , 2014 .

[8]  Edith Cowan.  Digital Play: The challenge of researching young children's Internet use , 2018 .

[9]  Frédéric Thiesse,et al.  RFID, privacy and the perception of risk: A strategic framework , 2007, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Trey Decker,et al.  Children's Online Privacy Protection Act , 2015 .

[11]  Imrich Chlamtac,et al.  Internet of things: Vision, applications and research challenges , 2012, Ad Hoc Networks.

[12]  E. Halliwell,et al.  Does Barbie make girls want to be thin? The effect of experimental exposure to images of dolls on the body image of 5- to 8-year-old girls. , 2006, Developmental psychology.

[13]  Sonia Livingstone,et al.  Children’s Rights Online: Challenges, Dilemmas and Emerging Directions , 2014 .

[14]  K. Montgomery,et al.  Children's Media Culture in a Big Data World , 2015 .

[15]  G. Mascheroni.  The Internet of Toys , 2017 .

[16]  Bart Schermer,et al.  Minding Minors Wandering the Web: Regulating Online Child Safety , 2014 .

[17]  Rolf H. Weber,et al.  Internet of things - Need for a new legal environment? , 2009, Comput. Law Secur. Rev..

[18]  Cristina Matamoros,et al.  Children’s rights in the digital age , 2015 .

[19]  Dag Slettemeås,et al.  RFID—the “Next Step” in Consumer–Product Relations or Orwellian Nightmare? Challenges for Research and Policy , 2009 .

[20]  Sara M. Grimes,et al.  Researching the Researchers: Market Researchers, Child Subjects and the Problem of "Informed" Consent , 2008 .

[21]  E. Zurbriggen,et al.  “Boys Can Be Anything”: Effect of Barbie Play on Girls’ Career Cognitions , 2014 .

[22]  Ian Hutchby,et al.  Children, Technology and Culture : The Impacts of Technologies in Children's Everyday Lives , 2001 .

[23]  Owain Jones,et al.  Surveillance, children and childhood [editorial] , 2010 .

[24]  Roger A. Clarke,et al.  Information technology and dataveillance , 1988, CACM.