The effect of a course management system (CMS)-supported strategy instruction on EFL reading comprehension and strategy use

This paper reports on the effect of a Moodle-supported strategy instruction on both reading comprehension and strategy use among EFL (English as a Foreign Language) students. Specific reading strategy training was first integrated into a Moodle system, which included reading exercises on problem identification, monitoring comprehension, inferencing, summarizing, transfer, resourcing, and questioning for clarification. The comparison between pre-test and post-test of the experimental group indicated that students had improved their reading comprehension performance after the experimental course was implemented. No significant difference in student reading comprehension performance was found in the control group. Moreover, the learning records were significantly correlated with the post-test of reading comprehension in the experimental group, indicating the positive effect on learning outcome. A questionnaire was also conducted to investigate the students’ perceived learning progress and strategy use. Before the instruction took place, there was no difference in strategy use observed between the experimental and control groups. After the instruction, students in the experimental group employed significantly more reading strategies than the students in the control group, especially in the categories of metacognitive and cognitive strategies. The results demonstrate that Moodle-supported strategy instruction can and will facilitate the EFL students’ overall reading comprehension and strategy use.

[1]  Vreda Pieterse,et al.  Student discussion forums: what is in it for them? , 2011, CSERC.

[2]  Lawrence Juii Zhang,et al.  Constructivist pedagogy in strategic reading instruction: exploring pathways to learner development in the English as a second language (ESL) classroom , 2008 .

[3]  Xiaodong Lin.  Designing metacognitive activities , 2001 .

[4]  E. Corte,et al.  Improving text comprehension strategies in upper primary school children: a design experiment. , 2001, The British journal of educational psychology.

[5]  Wen-Hsing Luo.  The Cambridge Guide to Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages , 2003 .

[6]  J. Michael O'Malley,et al.  The Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach: A Model for Linguistically Diverse Classrooms , 1996, The Elementary School Journal.

[7]  D DavisFred.  Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology , 1989 .

[8]  Sung Youl Park,et al.  An Analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model in Understanding University Students' Behavioral Intention to Use e-Learning , 2009, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[9]  Carisma Dreyer,et al.  Teaching reading strategies and reading comprehension within a technology-enhanced learning environment , 2003 .

[10]  Lee B. Abraham.  Computer-mediated glosses in second language reading comprehension and vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis , 2008 .

[11]  Alison H. Paris,et al.  Classroom Applications of Research on Self-Regulated Learning , 2001 .

[12]  Dianne Jamieson-Noel,et al.  Self-regulating studying by objectives for learning: Students’ reports compared to a model , 2003 .

[13]  Roman Taraban,et al.  College Students' Academic Performance and Self-Reports of Comprehension Strategy Use. , 2000 .

[14]  Volker Hegelheimer,et al.  Effects of Online Academic Lectures on ESL Listening Comprehension, Incidental Vocabulary Acquisition, and Strategy Use , 2004 .

[15]  Fred D. Davis.  A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems : theory and results , 1985 .

[16]  Ellen L. Block.  The Comprehension Strategies of Second Language Readers , 1986 .

[17]  Meng Chang Chen,et al.  Extending the TAM model to explore the factors that affect Intention to Use an Online Learning Community , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[18]  David W. Chan,et al.  Reading strategy use and motivation among Chinese good and poor readers in Hong Kong , 2003 .

[19]  Klaus Brandl,et al.  Are you ready to "Moodle"? , 2005 .

[20]  T. van Amelsvoort.  Bridging the Gap , 2014, Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie.

[21]  Andrew D. Cohen,et al.  Strategies in learning and using a second language , 1998 .

[22]  Huifen Lin,et al.  READING AUTHENTIC EFL TEXT USING VISUALIZATION AND ADVANCE ORGANIZERS IN A MULTIMEDIA LEARNING ENVIRONMENT , 2007 .

[23]  Philip H. Winne,et al.  Studying as self-regulated learning. , 1998 .

[24]  Phillip Rowles.  Teaching and Learning Vocabulary , 2003 .

[25]  D. K. Samida,et al.  Language Learning Strategies , 2004 .

[26]  Peter Afflerbach,et al.  Verbal Protocols of Reading: The Nature of Constructively Responsive Reading , 1996 .

[27]  Kouider Mokhtari,et al.  Assessing students' Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies , 2002 .

[28]  Ana Carvalho,et al.  Students' perceptions of Blackboard and Moodle in a Portuguese university , 2011, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[29]  Gerald G. Duffy.  Rethinking Strategy Instruction: Four Teachers' Development and Their Low Achievers' Understandings , 1993, The Elementary School Journal.

[30]  Michael Pressley,et al.  Strategies That Improve Children's Memory and Comprehension of Text , 1989, The Elementary School Journal.

[31]  Fredericka L. Stoller,et al.  Integrating Strategic Reading into L2 Instruction. , 1998 .

[32]  Debrorah Phillips,et al.  Longman Preparation Course for the TOEFL Test , 1988 .

[33]  Anna Uhl Chamot,et al.  The learning strategies handbook , 1999 .

[34]  Salvador Sánchez-Alonso,et al.  The use of e-learning course management systems to support learning strategies and to improve self-regulated learning , 2007 .

[35]  Chao-Min Chiu,et al.  Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[36]  Anjel Tozcu,et al.  Successful Learning of Frequent Vocabulary through CALL also Benefits Reading Comprehension and Speed , 2004 .

[37]  Neil Heffernan,et al.  The Short Readings Project: A CALL reading activity utilizing vocabulary recycling , 2006 .

[38]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Training Programs to Improve Learning in Later Adulthood: Helping Older Adults Educate Themselves , 1998 .

[39]  T. O. Nelson.  Metamemory: A Theoretical Framework and New Findings , 1990 .

[40]  Fred D. Davis.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: System Characteristics, User Perceptions and Behavioral Impacts , 1993, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[41]  Yi-Chuan Hsieh,et al.  Adding Innovation Diffusion Theory to the Technology Acceptance Model: Supporting Employees' Intentions to use E-Learning Systems , 2011, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[42]  Erping Zhu,et al.  Interaction and cognitive engagement: An analysis of four asynchronous online discussions , 2006 .

[43]  Yao-Ting Sung,et al.  Improving children's reading comprehension and use of strategies through computer-based strategy training , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[44]  Michael Pressley,et al.  Metacognition and Self-Regulated Comprehension , 2004 .

[45]  Kuo-En Chang,et al.  The Effect of Concept Mapping to Enhance Text Comprehension and Summarization , 2002 .

[46]  Elmar Souvignier,et al.  Using Self-Regulation as a Framework for Implementing Strategy Instruction to Foster Reading Comprehension. , 2006 .

[47]  Paul D. Ellis,et al.  The essential guide to effect sizes : statistical power, meta-analysis, and the interpretation of research results , 2010 .