On "Technomethodology": Foundational Relationships Between Ethnomethodology and System Design

Over the past 10 years, the use of sociological methods and sociological reasoning have become more prominent in the analysis and design of interactive systems. For a variety of reasons, one form of sociological inquiry-ethnomethodology-has become something of a favored approach. Our goal in this article is to investigate the consequences of approaching system design from the ethnomethodological perspective. In particular, we are concerned with how ethnomethodology can take a foundational place in the very notion of system design, rather than simply being employed as a resource in aspects of the process, such as requirements elicitation and specification. We begin by outlining the basic elements of ethnomethodology and discussing the place that it has come to occupy in computer-supported cooperative work and, increasingly, in human-computer interaction. We discuss current approaches to the use of ethnomethodology in systems design, and we point to the contrast between the use of ethnomethodology for critique and for design. Currently, understandings of how to use ethnomethodology as a primary aspect of system design are lacking. We outline a new approach and present an extended example of its use. This approach takes as its starting point a relationship between ethnomethodology and system design that is a foundational, theoretical matter rather than simply one of design practice and process. From this foundation, we believe, emerges a new model of interaction with computer systems, which is based on ethnomethodological perspectives on everyday human social action.

[1]  Christian Heath,et al.  Disembodied conduct: communication through video in a multi-media office environment , 1991, CHI.

[2]  Harvey Pinney.  The Structure of Social Action , 1940, Ethics.

[3]  H. Garfinkel,et al.  Temporal order in laboratory work , 1983 .

[4]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  What Are Workplace Studies For? , 1995, ECSCW.

[5]  David Frohlich,et al.  Computers and conversation , 1990 .

[6]  Harvey Sacks,et al.  Structures of Social Action: On doing “being ordinary” , 1985 .

[7]  James Paul Dourish,et al.  Open implementation and flexibility in CSCW toolkits , 1996 .

[8]  Bob Anderson,et al.  Supporting The Design Process Within An Organisational Context , 1993, ECSCW.

[9]  Gregor Kiczales,et al.  Beyond the Black Box: Open Implementation , 1996, IEEE Softw..

[10]  Kjeld Schmidt,et al.  Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work ECSCW ’95 , 1995, Springer Netherlands.

[11]  John Bowers,et al.  Representing the user: notes on the disciplinary rhetoric of human-computer interaction , 1995 .

[12]  Robert J. Anderson,et al.  Representations and Requirements: The Value of Ethnography in System Design , 1994, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[13]  Harold Ossher,et al.  Subject-oriented programming: a critique of pure objects , 1993, OOPSLA '93.

[14]  Dan Shapiro,et al.  The limits of ethnography: combining social sciences for CSCW , 1994, CSCW '94.

[15]  Abigail Sellen,et al.  Paper as an analytic resource for the design of new technologies , 1997, CHI.

[16]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  The computer reaches out: the historical continuity of interface design , 1989, CHI '90.

[17]  Daniel G. Bobrow,et al.  Common Lisp Object System Specification X2JI3 Document 88-002R , 1988 .

[18]  David Frohlich,et al.  Applying the Technology of Conversation to the Technology for Conversation , 1990 .

[19]  Richard Bentley,et al.  Sociologists can be surprisingly useful in interactive systems design , 1992 .

[20]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Freeflow: mediating between representation and action in workflow systems , 1996, CSCW '96.

[21]  Yasuhiko Yokote,et al.  The Apertos reflective operating system: the concept and its implementation , 1992, OOPSLA.

[22]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Accounting for system behavior: representation, reflection, and resourceful action , 1997 .

[23]  John Bowers,et al.  The work to make a network work: studying CSCW in action , 1994, CSCW '94.

[24]  Tom Rodden,et al.  Designing with ethnography: a presentation framework for design , 1997, DIS '97.

[25]  Rebecca E. Grinter.  Doing Software Development: Occasions for Automation and Formalisation , 1997, ECSCW.

[26]  Tom Rodden,et al.  Working with “constant interruption”: CSCW and the small office , 1994, CSCW '94.

[27]  John Bowers,et al.  Workflow From Within and Without: Technology and Cooperative Work on the Print Industry Shopfloor , 1995, ECSCW.

[28]  Eric Livingston,et al.  Making Sense of Ethnomethodology , 1987 .

[29]  Harold Garfinkel,et al.  Ethnomethodology and the human sciences: Respecification: evidence for locally produced, naturally accountable phenomena of order, logic, reason, meaning, method, etc. in and as of the essential haecceity of immortal ordinary society (I) – an announcement of studies , 1991 .

[30]  Harvey Sacks,et al.  Lectures on Conversation , 1995 .

[31]  T. Parsons,et al.  The Structure of Social Action , 1938 .

[32]  Craig S. Kaplan,et al.  Predicate Dispatching: A Unified Theory of Dispatch , 1998, ECOOP.

[33]  H. Garfinkel.  Studies in Ethnomethodology , 1968 .

[34]  Bob Anderson,et al.  The user as a scenic feature of the design space , 1994 .

[35]  P. Thomas.  The social and interactional dimensions of human-computer interfaces , 1995 .

[36]  Harvey Sacks,et al.  An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing sociology , 1972 .

[37]  L. Suchman.  Do categories have politics? The language/action perspective reconsidered , 1993 .

[38]  E. Schegloff,et al.  A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation , 1974 .

[39]  Craig Chambers,et al.  Predicate Classes , 1993, ECOOP.

[40]  Richard Bentley,et al.  Ethnographically-informed systems design for air traffic control , 1992, CSCW '92.

[41]  Christian Heath,et al.  Media Space and Communicative Asymmetries: Preliminary Observations of Video-Mediated Interaction , 1992, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[42]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication (Learning in Doing: Social, , 1987 .

[43]  Randall B. Smith,et al.  A Simple and Unifying Approach to Subjective Objects , 1996, Theory Pract. Object Syst..

[44]  Tom Rodden,et al.  Working with "Constant Interruption": CSCW and the Small Office , 1995, Inf. Soc..

[45]  Daniel G. Bobrow,et al.  Book review: The Art of the MetaObject Protocol By Gregor Kiczales, Jim des Rivieres, Daniel G. and Bobrow(MIT Press, 1991) , 1991, SGAR.

[46]  John Bowers,et al.  Talking through design: requirements and resistance in cooperative prototyping , 1994, CHI '94.