Les communautés de pratique sont-elles pertinentes ?

Résumé Des individus qui travaillent ensemble, réalisent des activités communes et / ou complémentaires, interagissent fréquemment et ont une histoire partagée, à l’intérieur d’une organisation, constituent une Communauté de Pratique (CP). Cette notion a été récemment théorisée et illustrée empiriquement. Elle connaît un succès croissant dans le monde académique comme auprès des praticiens. Cette communication – dont le titre joue avec celui de l’article de Segrestin (1980) qui parle des communautés « pertinentes » de l’action collective – vise à présenter et discuter la notion de communauté de pratique.

[1]  J. Lave.  Cognition in Practice: Outdoors: a social anthropology of cognition in practice , 1988 .

[2]  B. Latour,et al.  Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts , 1979 .

[3]  S. Barley.  The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. , 1990, Administrative science quarterly.

[4]  Isabelle Bouty.  Interpersonal and Interaction Influences on Informal Resource Exchanges Between R&D Researchers Across Organizational Boundaries , 2000 .

[5]  Davide Nicolini,et al.  The Organizational Learning of Safety in Communities of Practice , 2000 .

[6]  V. Chanal.  Communautés de pratique et management par projet : A propos de l'ouvrage de Wenger (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity , 2000 .

[7]  J. Brown,et al.  Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing , 1999, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[8]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[9]  John Seely Brown,et al.  Book Reviews : The Social Life of Information By John Seely Brown and Paul Duguid. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2000. 320 pages , 2000 .

[10]  S. Gherardi.  Practice-Based Theorizing on Learning and Knowing in Organizations , 2000 .

[11]  K. Weick.  Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems , 1976, Gestión y Estrategia.

[12]  R. Eccles,et al.  Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action , 1992 .

[13]  B. Kogut,et al.  What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning , 1996 .

[14]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning: A Theory Of Action Perspective , 1978 .

[15]  Pierre Bourdieu,et al.  Esquisse d ' une théorie de la pratique.(précédé de) trois études d ' éthnologie kabyle , 2000 .

[16]  Davide Nicolini,et al.  Toward a Social Understanding of How People Learn in Organizations , 1998 .

[17]  S. Barley.  Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. , 1986, Administrative science quarterly.

[18]  Edwin Hutchins,et al.  The technology of team navigation , 1990 .

[19]  J. Brown,et al.  Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective , 2001 .

[20]  R. Burt.  The Network Structure Of Social Capital , 2000 .

[21]  M. McLure Wasko,et al.  "It is what one does": why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[22]  R. Sainsaulieu.  L’identité au travail , 2019 .

[23]  André A. Lafrance.  La mémoire organisationnelle en rupture avec la mémoire individuelle , 2004 .

[24]  K. R. Conner,et al.  A Resource-Based Theory of the Firm: Knowledge Versus Opportunism , 1996 .

[25]  J. Orr,et al.  Talking About Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job. , 1997 .

[26]  E. Wenger.  Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems , 2000 .

[27]  J. Orr,et al.  Talking About Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job. , 1997 .

[28]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .