Advanced cervical pregnancy: uterus‐sparing therapy initiated with a combination of methotrexate and mifepristone followed by evacuation and local hemostatic measures

Cervical pregnancy accounts for approximately 0.1% of ectopic pregnancies (1). Due to its rarity, treatment is based on case reports and no randomized studies have been carried out to assess the various treatment options. A recent textbook recommends surgical management, usually hysterectomy (1). However, treatment of cervical pregnancy has improved greatly in recent years. The evolvement of non-surgical treatment modalities, such as use of methotrexate (MTX) (2), selective embolization of uterine arteries (3) or a combination of different treatments (3,4) has made uterus-sparing treatment possible. In addition, minimally invasive treatments using currettage and prostaglandin injection, or Shirodkar cerclage of the cervix have been reported (5). Predictors of unsuccessful outcome of MTX treatment of cervical pregnancy, necessitating additional medication or surgical intervention, have included high initial serum levels of human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) (> 10.000 IU/l), presence of fetal heart activity, crown-rump length (CRL) measurement above 10 mm and duration of pregnancy exceeding 9 weeks (6). Among the reported cases managed successfully with MTX, the highest pre-treatment levels of serum hCG have been approximately 170.000 IU/l (7). A combination of the antiprogestin mifepristone and MTX improves the results of conservative treatment of extrauterine pregnancy (8,9). We report a cervical pregnancy first diagnosed at the 10th week of pregnancy, with initial serum levels of hCG of approximately 100.000 IU/l, treated successfully with an initial combination of mifepristone and MTX as well as later evacuation and hemostatic measures at the cervix.

[1]  Y. Zalel,et al.  Cervical Shirodkar cerclage may be the treatment modality of choice for cervical pregnancy. , 2002, Human reproduction.

[2]  P. Lorigan,et al.  Characteristics of women with recurrent molar pregnancies. , 2000, Gynecologic oncology.

[3]  E. Calzolari,et al.  Mole maker phenotype: possible narrowing of the candidate region , 2000, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[4]  F. Kung,et al.  Efficacy of methotrexate treatment in viable and nonviable cervical pregnancies. , 1999, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[5]  Turner,et al.  Malacoplakia: von Hansemann’s disease , 1999, BJU international.

[6]  M. Seoud,et al.  Genetic mapping of a maternal locus responsible for familial hydatidiform moles. , 1999, Human molecular genetics.

[7]  G. de Placido,et al.  Conservative treatment by angiographic uterine artery embolization of a 12 week cervical ectopic pregnancy. , 1999, Human reproduction.

[8]  A. Schoenfeld,et al.  Case Report: Cervical pregnancy — a conservative stepwise approach , 1999 .

[9]  A. Schoenfeld,et al.  Cervical pregnancy--a conservative stepwise approach. , 1999, Human reproduction.

[10]  T. Hung,et al.  Prognostic factors for an unsatisfactory primary methotrexate treatment of cervical pregnancy: a quantitative review. , 1998, Human reproduction.

[11]  C. Chastang,et al.  Treating ectopic pregnancy with the combination of mifepristone and methotrexate: a phase II nonrandomized study. , 1998, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  Z. Alfirevic,et al.  Mifepristone in combination with methotrexate for the medical treatment of tubal pregnancy: a randomized, controlled trial. , 1998, Human reproduction.

[13]  N. Talati The pattern of benign gestational trophoblastic disease in Karachi. , 1998, JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association.

[14]  J. Hollanders,et al.  Cervical pregnancy following ultrasound-guided embryo transfer. Methotrexate treatment in spite of high beta-HCG levels. , 1997, Human reproduction.

[15]  J. Schenker,et al.  Intracytoplasmic sperm injection combined with preimplantation genetic diagnosis for the prevention of recurrent gestational trophoblastic disease. , 1997, Human reproduction.

[16]  T. Toth,et al.  High incidence of triploidy in in-vitro fertilized oocytes from a patient with a previous history of recurrent gestational trophoblastic disease. , 1996, Human reproduction.

[17]  G. Dickey,et al.  From the archives of the AFIP. Gestational trophoblastic disease: radiologic-pathologic correlation. , 1996, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[18]  M. Seoud,et al.  RECURRENT MOLAR PREGNANCIES IN A FAMILY WITH EXTENSIVE INTERMARRIAGE: REPORT OF A FAMILY AND REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE , 1995, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[19]  A. Ayhan,et al.  Pregnancy outcome after hydatidiform mole, initial and recurrent. , 1994, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[20]  P. Mansour,et al.  Recurrent consecutive partial molar pregnancy. , 1992, Gynecologic oncology.

[21]  P. Chopra,et al.  Malakoplakia of the female genital tract. , 1990, Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology.

[22]  H. Croxatto,et al.  Quantitation of RU 486 in human plasma by HPLC and RIA after column chromatography. , 1986, Contraception.

[23]  A. Mora-Tiscareño,et al.  Malacoplakia of the uterine cervix. Histologic, cytologic and ultrastructural study of a case. , 1986, Acta Cytologica.

[24]  R. Willén,et al.  Malacoplakia of the cervix and corpus uteri: a light microscopic, electron microscopic, and X-ray microprobe analysis of a case. , 1983, International Journal of Gynecological Pathology.

[25]  R. W. Wahl Malacoplakia of the uterine cervix: report of two cases. , 1982, Acta Cytologica.

[26]  W. Maxted,et al.  Malacoplakia: a study of the literature and current concepts of pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment. , 1981, The Journal of urology.

[27]  A. Chalvardjian,et al.  Malacoplakia of the female genital tract. , 1980, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[28]  D. Goldstein,et al.  TROPHOBLASTIC NEOPLASIA , 2022 .