Octane appetite:The Relevance of a Lower Limit to the MON Specification in a Downsized, Highly Boosted DISI Engine

Market demand for high performance gasoline vehicles and increasingly strict government emissions regulations are driving the development of highly downsized, boosted direct injection engines. The in-cylinder temperatures and pressures of these emerging technologies tend to no longer adhere to the test conditions defining the RON and MON octane rating scales. This divergence between fuel knock rating methods and fuel performance in modern engines has previously led to the development of an engine and operating condition dependent scaling factor, K, which allows for extrapolation of RON and MON values. Downsized, boosted DISI engines have been generally shown to have negative K-values when knock limited, indicating a preference for fuels of higher sensitivity and challenging the relevance of a lower limit to the MON specification. The Ultraboost engine is an inline-4 downsized, highly boosted prototype DISI engine designed to achieve a 35% reduction in CO2 emissions whilst maintaining performance of a production V8. A series of 14 fuel formulations were tested to probe engine response to various fuel properties. This paper presents results from a 7 fuel RON and MON decorrelated matrix at four high-load engine conditions. The K-value was found to be negative at all engine conditions; fuels of higher sensitivity were found to yield improved engine performance. Furthermore, in-cylinder experimental data from high load knocking conditions with a single standard octane fuel were used to simulate the K-value; a similar trend between theory and experiment was observed.

[1]  Sarah Anne Roberts,et al.  I Contact Information , 2016 .

[2]  Sam Akehurst,et al.  Extreme engine downsizing , 2011 .

[3]  Gautam Kalghatgi,et al.  Fuel Anti-Knock Quality - Part I. Engine Studies. , 2001 .

[4]  Trevor J. Davies,et al.  A new method to simulate the octane appetite of any spark ignition engine. , 2011 .

[5]  Gautam Kalghatgi,et al.  The Available and Required Autoignition Quality of Gasoline - Like Fuels in HCCI Engines at High Temperatures , 2004 .

[6]  Andrew Lewis,et al.  Ultra Boost for Economy: Extending the Limits of Extreme Engine Downsizing , 2014 .

[7]  Alessandro Romagnoli,et al.  Improving fuel economy by 35% through combined turbo and supercharging on a spark ignition engine , 2012 .

[8]  Gautam Kalghatgi,et al.  Auto-Ignition Quality of Practical Fuels and Implications for Fuel Requirements of Future SI and HCCI Engines , 2005 .

[9]  William R. Leppard,et al.  The chemical origin of fuel octane sensitivity , 1990 .

[10]  Luke Cruff,et al.  Fuel Effects in a Boosted DISI Engine , 2011 .

[11]  Andrew Lewis,et al.  Octane response in a downsized, highly boosted direct injection spark ignition engine , 2014 .

[12]  G. T. Kalghatgi,et al.  Fuel Anti-Knock Quality- Part II. Vehicle Studies - How Relevant is Motor Octane Number (MON) in Modern Engines? , 2001 .

[13]  Andrew Lewis,et al.  The Effect of Advanced Combustion Control Features on the Performance of a Highly Downsized Gasoline Engine , 2012 .

[14]  C. Orlebar,et al.  The Effects of Octane, Sensitivity and K on the Performance and Fuel Economy of a Direct Injection Spark Ignition Vehicle , 2014 .

[15]  Koichi Nakata,et al.  Octane Appetite Studies in Direct Injection Spark Ignition (DISI) Engines , 2005 .

[16]  Andrew Lewis,et al.  Ultra boost for economy:realizing a 60% downsized engine concept , 2013 .

[17]  Paul Crawford,et al.  The All New AJV8 , 2009 .

[18]  H. L. Walmsley,et al.  Relevance of Research and Motor Octane Numbers to the Prediction of Engine Autoignition , 2004 .

[19]  Per Risberg,et al.  A method of defining the auto-ignition quality of gasoline-like fuels in HCCI engines , 2003 .

[20]  R. Head,et al.  HCCI experiments with gasoline surrogate fuels modeled by a semidetailed chemical kinetic model , 2009 .