The Role of Robotics in Infectious Disease Crises

The recent coronavirus pandemic has highlighted the many challenges faced by the healthcare, public safety, and economic systems when confronted with a surge in patients that require intensive treatment and a population that must be quarantined or shelter in place. The most obvious and pressing challenge is taking care of acutely ill patients while managing spread of infection within the care facility, but this is just the tip of the iceberg if we consider what could be done to prepare in advance for future pandemics. Beyond the obvious need for strengthening medical knowledge and preparedness, there is a complementary need to anticipate and address the engineering challenges associated with infectious disease emergencies. Robotic technologies are inherently programmable, and robotic systems have been adapted and deployed, to some extent, in the current crisis for such purposes as transport, logistics, and disinfection. As technical capabilities advance and as the installed base of robotic systems increases in the future, they could play a much more significant role in future crises. This report is the outcome of a virtual workshop co-hosted by the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) and the Computing Community Consortium (CCC) held on July 9-10, 2020. The workshop consisted of over forty participants including representatives from the engineering/robotics community, clinicians, critical care workers, public health and safety experts, and emergency responders. It identifies key challenges faced by healthcare responders and the general population and then identifies robotic/technological responses to these challenges. Then it identifies the key research/knowledge barriers that need to be addressed in developing effective, scalable solutions. Finally, the report ends with the following recommendations on how to implement this strategy.

[1]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[2]  Alexander P. Henkel,et al.  Robotic transformative service research: deploying social robots for consumer well-being during COVID-19 and beyond , 2020, Journal of Service Management.

[3]  B. Scassellati,et al.  The potential of socially assistive robots during infectious disease outbreaks , 2020, Science Robotics.

[4]  R. Murphy Robots and pandemics in science fiction , 2020, Science Robotics.

[5]  Jeremy Straub,et al.  In search of technology readiness level (TRL) 10 , 2015 .

[6]  Jia Deng,et al.  Keep Healthcare Workers Safe: Application of Teleoperated Robot in Isolation Ward for COVID-19 Prevention and Control , 2020, Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering.

[7]  D. Brewster,et al.  Consensus statement: Safe Airway Society principles of airway management and tracheal intubation specific to the COVID‐19 adult patient group , 2020, The Medical journal of Australia.

[8]  Silvia Rossi,et al.  Where to Next? The Impact of COVID-19 on Human-Robot Interaction Research , 2020 .

[9]  Amit Jain,et al.  SARS-CoV-2 Impact on Elective Orthopaedic Surgery , 2020, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  R. Ye,et al.  Feasibility of a 5G-Based Robot-Assisted Remote Ultrasound System for Cardiopulmonary Assessment of Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 , 2020, Chest.

[11]  Mahdi Tavakoli,et al.  Robotics, Smart Wearable Technologies, and Autonomous Intelligent Systems for Healthcare During the COVID‐19 Pandemic: An Analysis of the State of the Art and Future Vision , 2020, Adv. Intell. Syst..

[12]  Simon Marvin,et al.  Containing COVID-19 in China: AI and the robotic restructuring of future cities , 2020, Dialogues in Human Geography.

[13]  Robin R. Murphy Humans and Robots in Off-Normal Applications and Emergencies , 2019 .

[14]  A. Lew,et al.  From high-touch to high-tech: COVID-19 drives robotics adoption , 2020, Tourism Geographies.

[15]  Laura Aymerich-Franch,et al.  The implementation of social robots during the COVID-19 pandemic , 2020, ArXiv.

[16]  Eleftherios Mylonakis,et al.  Emerging Technologies for Use in the Study, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Patients with COVID-19 , 2020, Cellular and molecular bioengineering.

[17]  Robin R. Murphy Emergency Informatics: Using Computing to Improve Disaster Management , 2016, Computer.

[18]  Angela P. Schoellig,et al.  Making Sense of the Robotized Pandemic Response: A Comparison of Global and Canadian Robot Deployments and Success Factors , 2020, ArXiv.

[19]  Sharon Jefferies,et al.  Final Report of the NASA Technology Readiness Assessment (TRA) Study Team , 2016 .

[20]  Tariq Masood,et al.  Reconfiguring and ramping-up ventilator production in the face of COVID-19: Can robots help? , 2020, Journal of Manufacturing Systems.

[21]  Maurie J. Cohen,et al.  A brave new world: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic for transitioning to sustainable supply and production , 2020, Resources, Conservation and Recycling.

[22]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  Combating COVID-19—The role of robotics in managing public health and infectious diseases , 2020, Science Robotics.

[23]  D. Mahr,et al.  Mitigating loneliness with companion robots in the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: an integrative framework and research agenda , 2020 .

[24]  Rakesh D. Raut,et al.  A proposed collaborative framework by using artificial intelligence-internet of things (AI-IoT) in COVID-19 pandemic situation for healthcare workers , 2020 .

[25]  Peter Kazanzides,et al.  Telerobotic Operation of Intensive Care Unit Ventilators , 2020, Frontiers in Robotics and AI.

[26]  J. Hollander,et al.  Virtually Perfect? Telemedicine for Covid-19. , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.