Car-following behavior characteristics of adaptive cruise control vehicles based on empirical experiments

Abstract Emerging automated vehicle (AV) technologies are increasingly being deployed around the world and it is only a matter of time before the transportation landscape changes dramatically. Unfortunately, those changes cannot be well predicted due to the lack of empirical data. But adaptive cruise control (ACC) vehicles are common in the market and can be used to fill this gap. In this paper, we aim to characterize the empirical car-following behaviors of a commercial ACC system and understand how ACC behaves in different conditions and the underlying impact mechanism. It is found that for a single ACC: (i) the ACC response time is comparable to human drivers but much larger than the ACC controller time gap and it exhibits small variance, (ii) the ACC response can amplify or dampen an oscillation, (iii) after the oscillation, the stabilization process can exhibit overshooting or undershooting, and (iv) these CF behaviors depend largely on the ACC headway setting, speed level, and leader stimulus, which produce the impacts directly and/or indirectly through the mediation of earlier ACC behaviors. For a three-vehicle platoon, our main finding is that the change from one ACC vehicle to the next is progressive for oscillation growth, and regressive for deceleration, acceleration, and overshooting. This implies that in long platoons, oscillation amplitude tends to exacerbate very quickly, which forces ACC vehicles further upstream to apply very strong braking followed by a strong acceleration. This can cause significant overshooting and safety hazards.

[1]  M. Lighthill,et al.  On kinematic waves I. Flood movement in long rivers , 1955, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[2]  J. Pinto-Gouveia,et al.  The mediation effect of experiential avoidance between coping and psychopathology in chronic pain. , 2011, Clinical psychology & psychotherapy.

[3]  Zuduo Zheng,et al.  Connectivity’s impact on mandatory lane-changing behaviour: Evidences from a driving simulator study , 2018, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[4]  Rui Jiang,et al.  On the role of speed adaptation and spacing indifference in traffic instability: Evidence from car-following experiments and its stochastic model , 2019, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological.

[5]  Emily Balcetis,et al.  Fondness makes the distance grow shorter: Desired locations seem closer because they seem more vivid , 2011 .

[6]  S.P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Driving behavior interaction with ACC: results from a Field Operational Test in the Netherlands , 2008, 2008 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium.

[7]  Ashish Bhaskar,et al.  Is more always better? The impact of vehicular trajectory completeness on car-following model calibration and validation , 2019, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological.

[8]  Daniel B. Work,et al.  Model-Based String Stability of Adaptive Cruise Control Systems Using Field Data , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles.

[9]  Nathan van de Wouw,et al.  Design and experimental evaluation of cooperative adaptive cruise control , 2011, 2011 14th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[10]  S.P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Field Operational Test "The Assisted Driver" , 2007, 2007 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium.

[11]  M. Graham CONFRONTING MULTICOLLINEARITY IN ECOLOGICAL MULTIPLE REGRESSION , 2003 .

[12]  Nakayama,et al.  Dynamical model of traffic congestion and numerical simulation. , 1995, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[13]  Biagio Ciuffo,et al.  The energy impact of adaptive cruise control in real-world highway multiple-car-following scenarios , 2020, European Transport Research Review.

[14]  H Ozaki,et al.  REACTION AND ANTICIPATION IN THE CAR-FOLLOWING BEHAVIOR. , 1993 .

[15]  Biagio Ciuffo,et al.  openACC. An open database of car-following experiments to study the properties of commercial ACC systems , 2020, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[16]  M Maarten Steinbuch,et al.  Design and implementation of parameterized adaptive cruise control : an explicit model predictive control approach , 2010 .

[17]  Steven E Shladover,et al.  Modeling cooperative and autonomous adaptive cruise control dynamic responses using experimental data , 2014 .

[18]  Soyoung Ahn,et al.  Applications of wavelet transform for analysis of freeway traffic : bottlenecks, transient traffic, and traffic oscillations , 2011 .

[19]  Victor L. Knoop,et al.  Platoon of SAE Level-2 Automated Vehicles on Public Roads: Setup, Traffic Interactions, and Stability , 2019, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

[20]  Han-Shue Tan,et al.  Design and field testing of a Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control system , 2010, Proceedings of the 2010 American Control Conference.

[21]  Vicente Milanés Montero,et al.  Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control in Real Traffic Situations , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[22]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[23]  Daniele Borio,et al.  Estimating empirically the response time of commercially available ACC controllers under urban and freeway conditions , 2019, 2019 6th International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems (MT-ITS).

[24]  Biagio Ciuffo,et al.  Empirical Study on the Properties of Adaptive Cruise Control Systems and Their Impact on Traffic Flow and String Stability , 2020 .

[25]  Maarten Steinbuch,et al.  String-Stable CACC Design and Experimental Validation: A Frequency-Domain Approach , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[26]  Biagio Ciuffo,et al.  Response Time and Time Headway of an Adaptive Cruise Control. An Empirical Characterization and Potential Impacts on Road Capacity , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[27]  John C Hayward,et al.  NEAR-MISS DETERMINATION THROUGH USE OF A SCALE OF DANGER , 1972 .

[28]  P. Fancher Intelligent cruise control field operational test. Final report. Volume I: Technical report , 1998 .

[29]  Bart van Arem,et al.  Driving Characteristics and Adaptive Cruise Control ? A Naturalistic Driving Study , 2017, IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine.

[30]  P. I. Richards Shock Waves on the Highway , 1956 .

[31]  Riender Happee,et al.  The Deployment of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems in Europe , 2015 .

[32]  Gordon F. Newell,et al.  A simplified car-following theory: a lower order model , 2002 .

[33]  A. Hayes Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach , 2013 .

[34]  Soyoung Ahn,et al.  A behavioural car-following model that captures traffic oscillations , 2012 .

[35]  Maria Laura Delle Monache,et al.  Are Commercially Implemented Adaptive Cruise Control Systems String Stable? , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[36]  Elizabeth W. Dunn,et al.  The invisible benefits of exercise. , 2011, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[37]  Yang Zhou,et al.  Robust local and string stability for a decentralized car following control strategy for connected automated vehicles , 2019, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological.