No-show rates in the vascular laboratory: analysis and possible solutions.

PURPOSE To report the consequence of missed appointments ("no-shows") in the noninvasive vascular laboratory of a large teaching hospital and evaluate the effect of one potential solution. MATERIALS AND METHODS The financial effect of missed appointments by outpatients during a 9-month period was calculated on the basis of weighted average reimbursement rates for the technical component of a bilateral venous duplex examination. In addition, the effect of an automated telephone reminder system on the no-show rate was studied over a subsequent 17-month period. RESULTS The overall no-show rate for outpatients in the vascular laboratory was 12%, with an average of 7.6 missed appointments per week. This translated to a gross annual revenue loss of $89,107 assuming a per-appointment revenue equal to the 2005 technical component of the reimbursement rate for outpatient bilateral duplex venous ultrasound studies. Of the 8,766 patients offered automated reminder calls, 4,648 (53%) agreed to receive the calls. The no-show rate was significantly greater for those patients who chose to receive automated reminder calls (8.9% vs 5.9%, P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS A 12% no-show rate offers an opportunity for significant cost savings and improved efficiency in the vascular laboratory. Automated reminder systems did not appear to significantly reduce the no-show rate. Various strategies are outlined to achieve the goal of a 5% no-show rate, including methods of scheduling, pre-examination notification, and advanced overbooking techniques. Further investigation into these strategies to reduce the no-show rate is needed.

[1]  Ronald E. Giachetti,et al.  A Stochastic Mathematical Appointment Overbooking Model for Healthcare Providers to Improve Profits , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[2]  C. Rust,et al.  Patient appointment failures in pediatric resident continuity clinics. , 1995, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[3]  D. Sharp,et al.  Non-attendance at general practices and outpatient clinics , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  B. Satiani,et al.  Appropriate Resource Utilization in Portable Noninvasive Vascular Studies: The Role of Disruptive Technology , 2006 .

[5]  K. Fiscella,et al.  Effectiveness of telephone reminders in improving rate of appointments kept at an outpatient clinic: a randomized controlled trial. , 2001, The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice.

[6]  Barry C. Smith,et al.  Yield Management at American Airlines , 1992 .

[7]  R B Haynes,et al.  An overview of interventions to improve compliance with appointment keeping for medical services. , 1992, JAMA.

[8]  Stephen R. Lawrence,et al.  Clinic Overbooking to Improve Patient Access and Increase Provider Productivity , 2007, Decis. Sci..

[9]  R CHAMBERLIN.  On with the show. , 1950, The American journal of nursing.

[10]  K. Kemper,et al.  Does excluding patients without telephones affect the results of telephone reminder studies? , 1993, The Western journal of medicine.

[11]  N. Santamaria,et al.  Why outpatients fail to attend their scheduled appointments: a prospective comparison of differences between attenders and non-attenders. , 2003, Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association.