Comparative experimental study of the survivability of a combined wind and wave energy converter in two testing facilities

Combining the offshore wind and wave energy on an integrated structure or in a farm configuration is beneficial for cost reduction since they could share the infrastructure and the ocean space. The spar torus combination (STC) is a combined wind and wave energy converter concept, which is composed of a spar floating wind turbine and a torus-shape heaving-body wave energy converter (WEC). Numerical simulations have shown a positive synergy between the WEC and the spar floating wind turbine under operational conditions. However, in extreme sea states, it is challenging to maintain structural integrity due to severe wave loads. Three survival modes have been proposed to study the survivability of the STC, and two of them are selected for further study by model testing. Two model tests were performed to investigate the performance of the STC under the two survival modes in extreme conditions: one test is carried out in the CNR-INSEAN towing tank, and the other one is performed in the MARINTEK towing tank. The two survival modes considered are when the torus is fixed to the spar at the mean water level (the MWL mode) and when the torus is fixed to the spar at a submerged position (the SUB mode). In this paper, the two model tests are described and then the measured responses in the two model tests are compared for each survival mode. In addition, the performance of the STC in the two survival modes for each model test is also compared. The differences in the two model tests are explained in detail. The focus of the model tests was wave-induced loads and responses, and wind was also included to model the mean wind thrust on the wind turbine rotor. In the model tests, the rigid body motions in six degree of freedom, the mooring line tensions, and the forces between the spar and torus in three directions (X, Y and Z) were measured. Finally, validation of a numerical model against the model test measurements is also briefly discussed.

[1]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Stochastic Dynamics of Marine Structures: Index , 2012 .

[2]  H. Martin,et al.  Development of a Scale Model Wind Turbine for Testing of Offshore Floating Wind Turbine Systems , 2011 .

[3]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  STC (Spar-Torus Combination): A Combined Spar-Type Floating Wind Turbine and Large Point Absorber Floating Wave Energy Converter — Promising and Challenging , 2012 .

[4]  Dominique Roddier,et al.  WindFloat: A Floating Foundation for Offshore Wind Turbines—Part II: Hydrodynamics Analysis , 2009 .

[5]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Modeling and Analysis of a 5 MW Semi-Submersible Wind Turbine Combined With Three Flap-Type Wave Energy Converters , 2014 .

[6]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Experimental and numerical study of hydrodynamic responses of a combined wind and wave energy converter concept in survival modes , 2015 .

[7]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Dynamic response and power performance of a combined Spar-type floating wind turbine and coaxial floating wave energy converter , 2013 .

[8]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Model Test of the STC Concept in Survival Modes , 2014 .

[9]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Effect of Flap Type Wave Energy Converters on the Response of a Semi-Submersible Wind Turbine in Operational Conditions , 2014 .

[10]  Joao Cruz,et al.  Ocean Wave Energy , 2008 .

[11]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Extreme responses of a combined spar-type floating wind turbine and floating wave energy converter (STC) system with survival modes , 2013 .

[12]  Hajime Mauro,et al.  The Drift of a Body Floating on Waves , 1960 .

[13]  Knut O. Ronold,et al.  New DNV Recommended Practice DNV-RP-C205 On Environmental Conditions And Environmental Loads , 2006 .

[14]  J. A. Pinkster,et al.  LOW-FREQUENCY PHENOMENA ASSOCIATED WITH VESSELS MOORED AT SEA , 1975 .

[15]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Joint Environmental Data at Five European Offshore Sites for Design of Combined Wind and Wave Energy Devices , 2013 .