The issues explored in this article are the role of exproprioceptive input and the nature of exteroceptive input provided by the visual system in the control of limb elevation as obstacles are stepped over during locomotion. In the first experiment, the differences in limb trajectory of movements over solid and fragile obstacles of similar dimensions were examined. Subjects increased their toe clearance, vertical position of the hip, and the hip vertical velocity when going over a fragile obstacle with the leading limb. This suggests that in addition to visually observable properties of obstacles such as height or width, other properties, such as rigidity or fragility, which may be classified as visually inferred, also influence the limb trajectory. Part of the first and the second experiment was focused on understanding differences in leading limb and trailing limb trajectory over obstacles. The toe clearance of the trailing limb was lower for smaller obstacles. There was no consistent correlation between the toe clearance values of the leading and trailing limbs. The variability in toe clearance was higher for the trailing limb, which is attributable to lack of visual exproprioceptive input about trailing limb movements and to the shorter time available following toe-off to fine-tune the trailing limb trajectory. Because the body center of mass is moving toward the supporting foot when the trailing limb goes over obstacles and the trailing limb foot is moving up, the chances of a trip are minimized and recovery from an unexpected trip are more likely. These results highlight the role of exproprioceptive input provided by the visual system and possible cognitive influences on the limb trajectory as one travels over uneven terrains.
[1]
J. Quintern,et al.
Obstruction of the swing phase during gait: phase-dependent bilateral leg muscle coordination
,
1986,
Brain Research.
[2]
David N. Lee,et al.
Gearing Action to the Environment
,
1986
.
[3]
A. Patla,et al.
Visual control of locomotion: strategies for changing direction and for going over obstacles.
,
1991,
Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[4]
J. Gibson.
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception
,
1979
.
[5]
G. McCollum,et al.
Invariant structure in locomotion
,
1988,
Neuroscience.
[6]
M. Jeannerod,et al.
Constraints on human arm movement trajectories.
,
1987,
Canadian journal of psychology.
[7]
A. Patla,et al.
Visual control of limb trajectory over obstacles during locomotion: effect of obstacle height and width
,
1993
.
[8]
H. Zelaznik,et al.
Motor-output variability: a theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts.
,
1979,
Psychological review.