Parallel algorithms for the assignment and minimum-cost flow problems

Let G = (V, E) be a network for an assignment problem with 2n nodes and m edges, in which the largest edge cost is C. Recently the class of instances of bipartite matching problems has been shown to be in RNC provided that C is O(log^kn) for some fixed k. We show how to use scaling so as to develop an improved parallel algorithm and show that bipartite matching problems are in the class RNC provided that C = O(n^l^o^g^^^k^n) for some fixed k. We then generalize these results to minimum-cost flow problems. Let U be an upper bound on the capacities of the edges and on the largest demand. We show that the minimum-cost flow problems is in the class RNC, provided that log(C + U) = O(log^kn) for some fixed k. Thus the minimum-cost flow problem is in the class RNC even when the magnitude of the costs and capacities are allowed to grow faster than any polynomial in n. The key to our approach is to reduce the number of processors needed from an amount that is proportional to the magnitude of the largest edge cost to an amount that is independent of the magnitude of the largest edge cost. The tradeoff is an increase in the running time that grows linearly in log(C + U).

[1]  Robert E. Tarjan,et al.  Almost-optimum speed-ups of algorithms for bipartite matching and related problems , 1988, STOC '88.

[2]  James B. Orlin,et al.  A faster strongly polynomial minimum cost flow algorithm , 1993, STOC '88.

[3]  Robert E. Tarjan,et al.  Network Flow Algorithms , 1989 .

[4]  Victor Y. Pan,et al.  Improved processor bounds for algebraic and combinatorial problems in RNC , 1985, 26th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (sfcs 1985).

[5]  Robert E. Tarjan,et al.  Faster Scaling Algorithms for Network Problems , 1989, SIAM J. Comput..

[6]  Steven Fortune,et al.  Parallelism in random access machines , 1978, STOC.

[7]  Andrew V. Goldberg,et al.  Sublinear-Time Parallel Algorithms for Matching and Related Problems , 1993, J. Algorithms.

[8]  Selim G. Akl,et al.  A perfect speedup parallel algorithm for the assignment problem on complete weighted bipartite graphs , 1990, Proceedings. PARBASE-90: International Conference on Databases, Parallel Architectures, and Their Applications.

[9]  Richard M. Karp,et al.  Theoretical Improvements in Algorithmic Efficiency for Network Flow Problems , 1972, Combinatorial Optimization.

[10]  Andrew V. Goldberg,et al.  Sublinear-time parallel algorithms for matching and related problems , 1988, [Proceedings 1988] 29th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[11]  Eli Upfal,et al.  Constructing a perfect matching is in random NC , 1985, STOC '85.

[12]  Robert E. Tarjan,et al.  Almost-Optimum Parallel Speed-Ups of Algorithms for Bipartite Matching and Related Problems ; CU-CS-425-89 , 1989 .

[13]  Don Coppersmith,et al.  Matrix multiplication via arithmetic progressions , 1987, STOC.

[14]  M. Goemans Network Ows , 2007 .

[15]  Eugene Lawler,et al.  Combinatorial optimization , 1976 .

[16]  W. Cunningham,et al.  A primal algorithm for optimum matching , 1978 .

[17]  Vijay V. Vazirani,et al.  Matching is as easy as matrix inversion , 1987, STOC.

[18]  Harold N. Gabow,et al.  Scaling algorithms for network problems , 1983, 24th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (sfcs 1983).

[19]  Robert E. Tarjan,et al.  Fibonacci heaps and their uses in improved network optimization algorithms , 1984, JACM.