Targeted marketing and seeding products with positive externality

We study a strategic model of marketing in social networks in which two firms compete for the spread of their products. Firms initially determine the production cost of their product, which results in the payoff of the product for consumers, and the number and the location of the consumers in a network who receive the product as a free offer. Consumers play a local coordination game over a fixed network which determines the dynamics of the spreading of products. Assuming myopic best response dynamics, consumers choose a product based on the payoff received by actions of their neighbors. This local update dynamics results in a game-theoretic diffusion process in the network. Utilizing earlier results in the literature, we derive a lower and an upper bound on the proportion of product adoptions which not only depend on the number of initial seeds but also incorporate their locations as well. Using these bounds, we then study which consumers should be chosen initially in a network in order to maximize product adoptions for firms. We show consumers should be seeded based on their eigenvector centrality in the network. We then consider a game between two firms aiming to optimize their products adoptions while considering their fixed budgets. We describe the Nash equilibrium of the game between firms in star and k-regular networks and compare the equilibrium with our previous results.

[1]  Marc Lelarge,et al.  Marketing in a Random Network , 2008, NET-COOP.

[2]  Éva Tardos,et al.  Influential Nodes in a Diffusion Model for Social Networks , 2005, ICALP.

[3]  Shishir Bharathi,et al.  Competitive Influence Maximization in Social Networks , 2007, WINE.

[4]  Steven N. Durlauf,et al.  The Economy As an Evolving Complex System III: Current Perspectives and Future Directions , 2005 .

[5]  Eyton,et al.  The Diffusion of Innovations in Social Networks , 2002 .

[6]  David Godes,et al.  Using Online Conversations to Study Word-of-Mouth Communication , 2004 .

[7]  Donald F. Towsley,et al.  The effect of network topology on the spread of epidemics , 2005, Proceedings IEEE 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies..

[8]  H. Peyton Young,et al.  The Diffusion of Innovations in Social Networks , 2000 .

[9]  Antoni Calvó-Armengol,et al.  Centre De Referència En Economia Analítica Barcelona Economics Working Paper Series Working Paper Nº 178 Who's Who in Networks. Wanted: the Key Player Who's Who in Networks. Wanted: the Key Player Barcelona Economics Wp Nº 178 , 2022 .

[10]  Michael Kearns,et al.  Competitive contagion in networks , 2011, STOC '12.

[11]  Adrian Vetta,et al.  Nash equilibria in competitive societies, with applications to facility location, traffic routing and auctions , 2002, The 43rd Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 2002. Proceedings..

[12]  J. Kleinberg Algorithmic Game Theory: Cascading Behavior in Networks: Algorithmic and Economic Issues , 2007 .

[13]  R. Rob,et al.  Learning, Mutation, and Long Run Equilibria in Games , 1993 .

[14]  A. Galeotti,et al.  Influencing the influencers: a theory of strategic diffusion , 2009 .

[15]  H. Young,et al.  Individual Strategy and Social Structure: An Evolutionary Theory of Institutions , 1999 .

[16]  Andrea Montanari,et al.  The spread of innovations in social networks , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  John C. Harsanyi,et al.  Общая теория выбора равновесия в играх / A General Theory of Equilibrium Selection in Games , 1989 .

[18]  Ali Jadbabaie,et al.  Game theoretic analysis of a strategic model of competitive contagion and product adoption in social networks , 2012, 2012 IEEE 51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[19]  A. Mas-Colell,et al.  Microeconomic Theory , 1995 .

[20]  H. Peyton Young,et al.  Individual Strategy and Social Structure , 2020 .

[21]  Peter H. Reingen,et al.  Brand Congruence in Interpersonal Relations: A Social Network Analysis , 1984 .

[22]  Jeff S. Shamma,et al.  Control of preferences in social networks , 2010, 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[23]  H. Young,et al.  The Evolution of Conventions , 1993 .

[24]  Glenn Ellison Learning, Local Interaction, and Coordination , 1993 .

[25]  Linda L. Price,et al.  The market maven: A diffuser of marketplace information. , 1987 .