Predicting interruptibility for manual data collection: a cluster-based user model

Previous work suggests that Quantified-Self applications can retain long-term usage with motivational methods. These methods often require intermittent attention requests with manual data input. This may cause unnecessary burden to the user, leading to annoyance, frustration and possible application abandonment. We designed a novel method that uses on-screen alert dialogs to transform recurrent smartphone usage sessions into moments of data contributions and evaluate how accurately machine learning can reduce unintended interruptions. We collected sensor data from 48 participants during a 4-week long deployment and analysed how personal device usage can be considered in scheduling data inputs. We show that up to 81.7% of user interactions with the alert dialogs can be accurately predicted using user clusters, and up to 75.5% of unintended interruptions can be prevented and rescheduled. Our approach can be leveraged by applications that require self-reports on a frequent basis and may provide a better longitudinal QS experience.

[1]  Jorge Gonçalves,et al.  Contextual experience sampling of mobile application micro-usage , 2014, MobileHCI '14.

[2]  Evangelos Karapanos,et al.  How do we engage with activity trackers?: a longitudinal study of Habito , 2015, UbiComp.

[3]  Christopher G. Atkeson,et al.  Predicting human interruptibility with sensors , 2005, TCHI.

[4]  Michael S. Bernstein,et al.  Twitch crowdsourcing: crowd contributions in short bursts of time , 2014, CHI.

[5]  Martin Pielot,et al.  Large-scale evaluation of call-availability prediction , 2014, UbiComp.

[6]  Brian P. Bailey,et al.  Effects of intelligent notification management on users and their tasks , 2008, CHI.

[7]  Barry A. T. Brown,et al.  100 days of iPhone use: understanding the details of mobile device use , 2014, MobileHCI '14.

[8]  Scott E. Hudson,et al.  Using visualizations to increase compliance in experience sampling , 2008, UbiComp.

[9]  Mirco Musolesi,et al.  PrefMiner: mining user's preferences for intelligent mobile notification management , 2016, UbiComp.

[10]  R. Barker Ecological Psychology: Concepts and Methods for Studying the Environment of Human Behavior , 1968 .

[11]  Jorge Gonçalves,et al.  A Systematic Assessment of Smartphone Usage Gaps , 2016, CHI.

[12]  Mirco Musolesi,et al.  InterruptMe: designing intelligent prompting mechanisms for pervasive applications , 2014, UbiComp.

[13]  Mary Jo Hatch,et al.  Physical Barriers, Task Characteristics, and Interaction Activity in Research and Development Firms , 1987 .

[14]  Tapio Soikkeli,et al.  Diversity and End User Context in Smartphone Usage Sessions , 2011, 2011 Fifth International Conference on Next Generation Mobile Applications, Services and Technologies.

[15]  Konrad Tollmar,et al.  Health Mashups: Presenting Statistical Patterns between Wellbeing Data and Context in Natural Language to Promote Behavior Change , 2013, TCHI.

[16]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  The WEKA data mining software: an update , 2009, SKDD.

[17]  Daniel J. Wigdor,et al.  Slide to X: unlocking the potential of smartphone unlocking , 2014, CHI.

[18]  Martin Pielot,et al.  When attention is not scarce - detecting boredom from mobile phone usage , 2015, UbiComp.

[19]  Joyce Ho,et al.  Using context-aware computing to reduce the perceived burden of interruptions from mobile devices , 2005, CHI.

[20]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Diversity in smartphone usage , 2010, MobiSys '10.

[21]  Tadashi Okoshi,et al.  Investigating interruptibility at activity breakpoints using smartphone activity recognition API , 2016, UbiComp Adjunct.

[22]  Melanie Swan,et al.  The Quantified Self: Fundamental Disruption in Big Data Science and Biological Discovery , 2013, Big Data.

[23]  Jorge Gonçalves,et al.  Quantifying Sources and Types of Smartwatch Usage Sessions , 2017, CHI.

[24]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Experience sampling for building predictive user models: a comparative study , 2008, CHI.

[25]  Efraim Turban,et al.  Determinants of successful Website design: relative importance and recommendations for effectiveness , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[26]  Tadashi Okoshi,et al.  Attelia: Reducing user's cognitive load due to interruptive notifications on smart phones , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom).

[27]  Thomas Zimmermann,et al.  Persuasive technology in the real world: a study of long-term use of activity sensing devices for fitness , 2014, CHI.

[28]  Martin Pielot,et al.  Boredom-computer interaction: boredom proneness and the use of smartphone , 2015, UbiComp.

[29]  Fiona Fui-Hoon Nah,et al.  A study on tolerable waiting time: how long are Web users willing to wait? , 2004, AMCIS.

[30]  Alireza Sahami Shirazi,et al.  Large-scale assessment of mobile notifications , 2014, CHI.

[31]  Konrad Tollmar,et al.  The power of mobile notifications to increase wellbeing logging behavior , 2013, CHI.

[32]  Adrienne Porter Felt,et al.  Alice in Warningland: A Large-Scale Field Study of Browser Security Warning Effectiveness , 2013, USENIX Security Symposium.

[33]  Alexander Markowetz,et al.  Differentiating smartphone users by app usage , 2016, UbiComp.

[34]  Denzil Ferreira AWARE:a mobile context instrumentation middleware to collaboratively understand human behavior , 2013 .

[35]  Albrecht Schmidt,et al.  Recognizing context for annotating a live life recording , 2007, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[36]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  Semi-Automated Tracking: A Balanced Approach for Self-Monitoring Applications , 2017, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[37]  Denzil Ferreira,et al.  AWARE: Mobile Context Instrumentation Framework , 2015, Front. ICT.

[38]  Mirco Musolesi,et al.  Ask, but don't interrupt: the case for interruptibility-aware mobile experience sampling , 2015, UbiComp/ISWC Adjunct.

[39]  Evangelos Karapanos,et al.  Sustaining user engagement with behavior-change tools , 2015, Interactions.

[40]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[41]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  The Experience Sampling Method , 2014 .

[42]  Pilsung Choe,et al.  Driving Safety Considered User Interface of a Smartphone: An Experimental Comparison , 2015, HCI.

[43]  Martin Pielot,et al.  Didn't you see my message?: predicting attentiveness to mobile instant messages , 2014, CHI.

[44]  Susanne Boll,et al.  Sensor-Based Identification of Opportune Moments for Triggering Notifications , 2014, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[45]  Zhaohui Wu,et al.  Discovering different kinds of smartphone users through their application usage behaviors , 2016, UbiComp.

[46]  Anind K. Dey,et al.  Understanding and Using Context , 2001, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[47]  Jorge Gonçalves,et al.  The curse of quantified-self: an endless quest for answers , 2015, UbiComp/ISWC Adjunct.

[48]  Antonio Krüger,et al.  Back to the app: the costs of mobile application interruptions , 2012, Mobile HCI.