Quantum interfaces

Rational agents acting as observers use “knowables” to construct a vision of the outside world. Thereby, they are bound by the information exchanged with what they consider to be objects. The cartesian cut or, in modern terminology, the interface mediating this exchange, is again a construction. It serves as a “scaffolding,” an intermediate construction capable of providing the necessary conceptual means. An attempt is made to formalize the interface, in particular the quantum interface and quantum measurements, by a symbolic information exchange. A principle of conservation of information is reviewed and a measure of information flux through the interface is proposed. We cope with the question of why observers usually experience irreversibility in measurement processes if the evolution is reversible, i.e., one-to-one. And why should there be any meaningful concept of classical information if there is merely quantum information to begin with? We take the position here that the concept of irreversible measurement is no deep principle but originates in the practical inability to reconstruct a quantum state of the object. Many issues raised apply also to the quantum’s natural double, virtual reality. An experiment is proposed to test the conjecture that the self is transcendent.

[1]  A. Zeilinger A Foundational Principle for Quantum Mechanics , 1999, Synthese Library.

[2]  A. Hobson Concepts in statistical mechanics , 1971 .

[3]  Wojciech H. Zurek,et al.  Decoherence, einselection and the existential interpretation (the rough guide) , 1998, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[4]  G. J. Dalenoort,et al.  Inside Versus Outside , 1994 .

[5]  E. Jaynes Information Theory and Statistical Mechanics , 1957 .

[6]  K. Svozil Relativizing Relativity , 1998, physics/9809025.

[7]  Gregory J. Chaitin,et al.  The Unknowable , 1999, Nabokov and Indeterminacy.

[8]  N. Bohr II - Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete? , 1935 .

[9]  Tommaso Toffoli,et al.  The Role of the Observer in Uniform Systems , 1978 .

[10]  K. Svozil The Church-Turing thesis as a guiding principle for physics , 1997, quant-ph/9710052.

[11]  Karl Svozil Connections between Deviations from Lorentz Transformation and Relativistic Energy-Momentum Relation , 1986 .

[12]  V. Buzek,et al.  Quantum State Reconstruction From Incomplete Data , 1998 .

[13]  Daniel M. Greenberger,et al.  “Haunted” measurements in quantum theory , 1989 .

[14]  A. Katz Principles of statistical mechanics : the information theory approach , 1967 .

[15]  M. Redhead Quantum theory and measurement , 1984 .

[16]  John L. Casti,et al.  Real brains: artificial minds , 1987 .

[17]  J. Bricmont SCIENCE OF CHAOS OR CHAOS IN SCIENCE? , 1995, chao-dyn/9603009.

[18]  O. Rössler Endophysics: The World As an Interface , 1998 .

[19]  E. Wigner Remarks on the Mind-Body Question , 1995 .

[20]  Herzog,et al.  Complementarity and the quantum eraser. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[21]  Imre Lakatos,et al.  The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes , 1978 .