Quality-checking the new normal: trial modality in online jury decision-making research

[1]  Angela M. Jones,et al.  Trial by Tabloid: Can Implicit Bias Education Reduce Pretrial Publicity Bias? , 2021, Criminal Justice and Behavior.

[2]  Evelyn M. Maeder,et al.  Methodology matters: comparing sample types and data collection methods in a juror decision-making study on the influence of defendant race , 2017 .

[3]  Duncan R Babbage,et al.  Film clips and narrative text as subjective emotion elicitation techniques , 2017, The Journal of social psychology.

[4]  B. Bornstein.  Jury simulation research: Pros, cons, trends, and alternatives. , 2017 .

[5]  Joel D. Lieberman,et al.  Managing Different Aspects of Validity in Jury Simulation Research , 2017 .

[6]  Joel D. Lieberman,et al.  The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: Professional Perceptions of Jury Decision-making Research Practices. , 2016, Behavioral sciences & the law.

[7]  J. Koehler,et al.  Jury Simulation Goals , 2014 .

[8]  Jesse Chandler,et al.  Nonnaïveté among Amazon Mechanical Turk workers: Consequences and solutions for behavioral researchers , 2013, Behavior Research Methods.

[9]  Aman Yadav,et al.  If a picture is worth a thousand words is video worth a million? Differences in affective and cognitive processing of video and text cases , 2011, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[10]  S. Diamond,et al.  Goffman on the Jury: Real Jurors’ Attention to the “Offstage” of Trials , 2010, Law and human behavior.

[11]  Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis,et al.  Running Experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk , 2010, Judgment and Decision Making.

[12]  Samuel R. Sommers,et al.  "Race salience" in juror decision-making: misconceptions, clarifications, and unanswered questions. , 2009, Behavioral sciences & the law.

[13]  K. Pezdek,et al.  (www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/acp.1578 Does Trial Presentation Medium Matter in Jury Simulation Research? Evaluating the Effectiveness of Eyewitness Expert Testimony , 2022 .

[14]  H. Joffe.  The Power of Visual Material: Persuasion, Emotion and Identification , 2008 .

[15]  Julian A. Oldmeadow,et al.  Picture this: emotional and political responses to photographs of the Kenneth Bigley kidnapping , 2006 .

[16]  Amy Coplan,et al.  Catching Characters Emotions: Emotional Contagion Responses to Narrative Fiction Film , 2006 .

[17]  Michel M. Haigh,et al.  The Effects of Print News Photographs of the Casualties of War , 2006 .

[18]  B. Grannemann,et al.  How the Defendant's Emotion Level Affects Mock Jurors' Decisions When Presentation Mode and Evidence Strength Are Varied1 , 2004 .

[19]  K. Durrheim,et al.  The Effectiveness of the Vignette Methodology: A Comparison of Written and Video Vignettes in Eliciting Responses about Date Rape , 2002 .

[20]  Samuel R. Sommers,et al.  White Juror Bias: An Investigation of Prejudice Against Black Defendants in the American Courtroom , 2001 .

[21]  B. Bornstein.  The Ecological Validity of Jury Simulations: Is the Jury Still Out? , 1999 .

[22]  R. Simons,et al.  Roll ‘em!: The effects of picture motion on emotional responses , 1998 .

[23]  S. Diamond.  Illuminations and Shadows from Jury Simulations , 1997 .

[24]  R. C. Katz,et al.  Evidential and extralegal factors in juror decisions: Presentation mode, retention, and level of emotionality , 1996 .

[25]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Emotional Contagion , 1993 .

[26]  G. Lassiter,et al.  The Potential for Bias in Videotaped Confessions1 , 1992 .

[27]  A. Paivio,et al.  Dual coding theory and education , 1991 .

[28]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Communication modality as a determinant of persuasion: The role of communicator salience. , 1983 .

[30]  L. Wrightsman,et al.  Effects of Presentation Mode Upon Mock Jurors' Reactions to a Trial , 1979 .

[31]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Communication modality as a determinant of message persuasiveness and message comprehensibility. , 1976 .

[32]  R. Howell,et al.  Juror Perceptions of Trial Testimony as a Function of the Method of Presentation: A Comparison of Live, Color Video, Black-and-White Video, Audio, and Transcript Presentations , 1975 .