Odor recognition: familiarity, identifiability, and encoding consistency.

The investigation examined the association between the perceived identity of odorous stimuli and the ability to recognize the previous occurrence of them. The stimuli comprised 20 relatively familiar odorous objects such as chocolate, leather, popcorn, and soy sauce. Participants rated the familiarity of the odors and sought to identify them. At various intervals up to 7 days after initial inspection, the participants sought to recognize the odors among sets of distractor odors that included such items as soap, cloves, pipe tobacco, and so on. The recognition response entailed a confidence rating as to whether or not an item had appeared in the original set. At the time of testing, the participants also sought to identify the stimuli again. The results upheld previous findings of excellent initial recognition memory for environmentally relevant odors and slow forgetting. The results also uncovered, for the first time, a strong association between recognition memory and identifiability, rated familiarity, and the ability to use an odor label consistently at inspection and subsequent testing. Encodability seems to enhance rather than to permit recognizability. Even items identified incorrectly or inconsistently were recognized at levels above chance.

[1]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Remembering environmental sounds: The role of verbalization at input , 1977, Memory & cognition.

[2]  T. Engen,et al.  Associations to odors: interference, mnemonics, and verbal labeling. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[3]  H. Ellis,et al.  Stimulus codability and long-term recognition memory for visual form. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  Acquisition of verbal associations to olfactory stimuli of varying familiarity and to abstract visual stimuli. , 1975, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[5]  C I HOVLAND,et al.  The effect of verbalization during observation of stimulus objects upon accuracy of recognition and recall. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  William P. Banks,et al.  Signal detection theory and human memory. , 1970 .

[7]  W. Cain Odor identification by males and females: Predictions vs performance. , 1982 .

[8]  B M Ross,et al.  Long-term memory of odors with and without verbal descriptions. , 1973, Journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  W S Cain,et al.  Odor identification in young and elderly persons: sensory and cognitive limitations. , 1981, Journal of gerontology.

[10]  C. Pfaffmann,et al.  Absolute judgments of odor quality. , 1960, Journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  Richard G. Davis Acquisition and Retention of Verbal Associations to Olfactory and Abstract Visual Stimuli of Varying Similarity. , 1977 .

[12]  L. Carmichael,et al.  An experimental study of the effect of language on the reproduction of visually perceived form. , 1932 .

[13]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Encoding and recognition memory for naturalistic sounds. , 1973, Journal of experimental psychology.

[14]  W. Cain,et al.  RECOGNITION MEMORY FOR ODORS , 1975 .

[15]  Gary K. Beauchamp,et al.  The human capacity to transmit olfactory information , 1974 .

[16]  W S Cain,et al.  To know with the nose: keys to odor identification. , 1979, Science.

[17]  R. Haber,et al.  One reason why we rarely forget a face , 1974 .

[18]  H. Lawless Recognition of common odors, pictures, and simple shapes , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[20]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Processing in Human Memory , 1979 .