Massive, Open, Online, and National? A Study of How National Governments and Institutions Shape the Development of MOOCs

We explore interpretations of MOOCs around the globe and, in particular, interpretations of MOOCs in Norway. Based on a review of previous studies relevant to these topics, we present two contrasting views on the emergence and development of MOOCs, namely the global interruption view and the national mediation view. We suggest, based on previous studies that MOOCs seem to follow national paths more than global paths. In order to grasp the diversity of understandings of MOOCs, we developed a framework that embraces various aspects of motivation, context, and structure regarding MOOCs. With these two polarised views of MOOC development (the global interruption view and the national mediation view), and the framework serving as an analytical approach, we looked at Norway and analyzed the understandings of the development of MOOCs within this particular national context. The national government seems to have been important in the development of the present MOOCs in Norway, both by organizing a particular group of experts in a dedicated commission to consider the future of MOOC in Norway, and by initiating and giving financial support to the development of MOOCs.

[1]  William G. Bowen,et al.  Performing Arts, the Economic Dilemma: a Study of Problems Common to Theater, Opera, Music and Dance , 1977 .

[2]  Jeremy Knox.  Posthumanism and the MOOC: opening the subject of digital education , 2016 .

[3]  William G. Bowen,et al.  Higher Education in the Digital Age , 2013, IEEE Trans. Prof. Commun..

[4]  Carl Wieman,et al.  Change : The Magazine of Higher Learning , 2015 .

[5]  Michael McVey.  MOOCs and open education around the world , 2016 .

[6]  António Teixeira,et al.  Comparing MOOC Adoption Strategies in Europe: Results from the HOME Project Survey , 2015 .

[7]  Martin D. Snyder.  MOOCs ( Massive Open Online Courses ) Journals and Blogs , 2016 .

[8]  António Teixeira,et al.  Opportunities and Threats of the MOOC Movement for Higher Education: the European Perspective , 2015 .

[9]  Michael Gaebel,et al.  MOOCs: Massive Open Online Courses. An Update of EUA's First Paper (January 2013). EUA Occasional Papers. , 2014 .

[10]  Li Yuan,et al.  MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education , 2013 .

[11]  J. Baggaley.  MOOC rampant , 2013 .

[12]  Gayle S. Christensen,et al.  Higher Education and MOOCs in India and the Global South , 2015 .

[13]  George Veletsianos,et al.  A Systematic Analysis and Synthesis of the Empirical MOOC Literature Published in 2013–2015 , 2016 .

[14]  John Covach.  To MOOC or Not To MOOC , 2013 .

[15]  Jean Jacoby,et al.  The Disruptive Potential of the Massive Open Online Course: A Literature Review. , 2014 .

[16]  Timothy Read,et al.  Toward a Quality Model for UNED MOOCs , 2014 .

[17]  Sarah Hayes,et al.  MOOCs and quality: a review of the recent literature , 2015 .

[18]  James G. Mazoué,et al.  The MOOC Model: Challenging Traditional Education , 2014 .

[19]  Kathryn Graziano.  The innovator's dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail , 1998 .

[20]  Iain Doherty,et al.  Learning in MOOCs , 2014 .

[21]  Devayani Tirthali,et al.  Why do Institutions Offer MOOCs , 2014 .

[22]  A. W. Bates,et al.  Teaching in a Digital Age , 2015 .

[23]  Shirley Williams,et al.  MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012 , 2013 .

[24]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Disruptive Technologies: Catching the Wave , 1995 .

[25]  Christine Nadel,et al.  Case Study Research Design And Methods , 2016 .

[26]  Mark Brown,et al.  Quality models in online and open education around the globe. State of the art and recommendations , 2015 .

[27]  C. Sinclair,et al.  Teacher Experiences and Academic Identity: The Missing Components of MOOC Pedagogy , 2014 .

[28]  Elizabeth Colucci,et al.  E-Learning in European Higher Education Institutions: Results of a Mapping Survey Conducted in October-December 2013. , 2014 .

[29]  Anine Havn Andresen.  The Norwegian MOOC - Objectives and development of massive open online courses in Norway , 2016 .

[30]  Gráinne Conole,et al.  MOOCs as disruptive technologies: strategies for enhancing the learner experience and quality of MOOCs Los MOOC como tecnologías disruptivas: estrategias para mejorar la experiencia de aprendizaje y la calidad de los MOOC. , 2016 .

[31]  Karsten Lundqvist,et al.  MOOCS As A Method Of Distance Education In The Arab World – A Review Paper , 2015 .

[32]  Robert Schuwer,et al.  Institutional MOOC strategies in Europe , 2015 .

[33]  Allison Littlejohn,et al.  Instructional quality of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[34]  N. Selwyn,et al.  Massive Open Online Change? Exploring the Discursive Construction of the "MOOC" in Newspapers. , 2015 .

[35]  D. Casey.  A Journey to Legitimacy: The Historical Development of Distance Education through Technology , 2008 .