Counterpropagation Neural Network for Stochastic Conditional Simulation: An Application with Berea Sandstone

A neural network trained using the counterpropagation algorithm to produce stochastic conditional simulations is applied and evaluated on a real dataset. This type of network is a non-parametric clustering algorithm not constrained by assumptions (i.e. normal distributions) and is well suited for risk and uncertainty analysis given spatially auto- correlated data. Detailed geophysical measurements from a slab of Berea sandstone are used to allow comparison with a traditional geostatistical method of producing conditional simulations known as sequential Gaussian simulation. Equiprobable simulations and estimated fields of air permeability are generated using an anisotropic spatial structure extracted from a subset of observation data. Results from the counterpropagation network are statistically similar to the geostatistical methods and original reference fields. The combination of simplicity and computational speed make the method ideally suited for environmental subsurface characterization and other earth science applications with spatially auto- correlated variables.

[1]  R J Poppi,et al.  Application of artificial neural networks to the classification of soils from São Paulo State using near-infrared spectroscopy. , 2001, The Analyst.

[2]  Young-Seuk Park,et al.  Hierarchical community classification and assessment of aquatic ecosystems using artificial neural networks. , 2004, The Science of the total environment.

[3]  Donna M. Rizzo,et al.  Stochastic simulation and spatial estimation with multiple data types using artificial neural networks , 2007 .

[4]  Christopher A. Rautman,et al.  Probabilistic Assessment of Ground‐Water Contamination: 2. Results of Case Study , 1996 .

[5]  G. Marsily Quantitative Hydrogeology: Groundwater Hydrology for Engineers , 1986 .

[6]  R. Hecht-Nielsen Counterpropagation networks. , 1987, Applied optics.

[7]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  Self-organization and associative memory: 3rd edition , 1989 .

[8]  Kuolin Hsu,et al.  Artificial Neural Network Modeling of the Rainfall‐Runoff Process , 1995 .

[9]  Pierre Goovaerts,et al.  Geostatistical modelling of uncertainty in soil science , 2001 .

[10]  A. Journel Geostatistics for Conditional Simulation of Ore Bodies , 1974 .

[11]  William W.-G. Yeh,et al.  Aquifer parameter identification with kriging and optimum parameterization , 1983 .

[12]  Andre G. Journel,et al.  Geostatistics for Natural Resources Characterization: Part 1 , 2013 .

[13]  Christopher A. Rautman,et al.  Probabilistic Assessment of Ground‐Water Contamination: 1. Geostatistical Framework , 1996 .

[14]  D. Rizzo,et al.  Characterization of aquifer properties using artificial neural networks: Neural kriging , 1994 .

[15]  Pierre Goovaerts,et al.  Impact of the simulation algorithm, magnitude of ergodic fluctuations and number of realizations on the spaces of uncertainty of flow properties , 1999 .

[16]  James L. McClelland Parallel Distributed Processing , 2005 .

[17]  S. Grossberg Some Networks That Can Learn, Remember, and Reproduce any Number of Complicated Space-Time Patterns, I , 1969 .

[18]  Clayton V. Deutsch,et al.  GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide , 1993 .

[19]  F. Alabert,et al.  Non-Gaussian data expansion in the Earth Sciences , 1989 .