Ultrasound Tissue Characterization of Breast Biopsy Specimens

Results of measurements of ultrasound speed and absorption coefficients in the range 3 to 8 MHz in breast tissues at 37 C are reported and analyzed in attempts to identify a set of ultrasound parameters capable of discriminating normal, benign, and malignant tissues. We analyzed 118 tissue regions, comprising 47 normal, 55 benign, and 16 malignant by straight-line fitting of frequency dependence of attenuation. Data for ten additional regions, for a total of 128, became available and were added to the cohort when we subsequently fitted quadratic curves. Sound speed consistently emerged as the variable with greatest discriminating power, particularly for separating normal from benign and malignant tissue. Great difficulty was encountered in discriminating benign from malignant, even when the jackknife technique was used. More success was found with classification and regression trees (CART), although results were sensitive to assigned misclassification costs. Best results from straight-line fits were obtained when discriminating malignant from combined normal/benign data after randomly assigning 75 percent of the data to the learning set and 25 percent to the test set. Then, 23 out of 25 normal/benign and 4 out of 4 malignant cases in the test set were correctly classified. With quadratic fitting, best results were obtained in the three-class case — the false positive rate for malignancy was reduced to zero in the learning (0/31) and test (0/10) sets. Nevertheless, the false negative rate increased to 13 out of 31 (42 percent) in the learning set, while attaining zero (0/4) in the test set.

[1]  F. Dunn,et al.  Comprehensive compilation of empirical ultrasonic properties of mammalian tissues. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Strategy (motivation) for detection of early breast cancer , 1980, Cancer.

[3]  L Landini,et al.  Orientation and frequency dependence of backscatter coefficient in normal and pathological breast tissues. , 1987, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[4]  L. J. Busse,et al.  Detection of spatially nonuniform ultrasonic radiation with phase sensitive (piezoelectric) and phase insensitive (acoustoelectric) receivers , 1981 .

[5]  E. Kelly-Fry,et al.  Ultrasound visualization of the breast in symptomatic patients. , 1980, Radiology.

[6]  B. Goldberg,et al.  Ultrasound mammography: a comparison with radiographic mammography. , 1981, Radiology.

[7]  K F Etzold,et al.  Differences in the attenuation of ultrasound by normal, benign, and malignant breast tissue , 1976, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[8]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Classification and Regression Trees , 1984 .

[9]  J. Heyman Phase insensitive acoustoelectric transducer , 1978 .

[10]  James F. Greenleaf,et al.  CLINICAL IMAGING WITH TRANSMISSIVE ULTRASONIC COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY , 1981 .

[11]  T. V. Oughton,et al.  Breast imaging in coronal planes with simultaneous pulse echo and transmission ultrasound. , 1981, Science.

[12]  F L Bookstein,et al.  Assessment of ultrasonic computed tomography in symptomatic breast patients by discriminant analysis. , 1989, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[13]  L Landini,et al.  Frequency-dependent attenuation in breast tissue characterization. , 1985, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[14]  F. Foster,et al.  Frequency dependence of ultrasound attenuation and backscatter in breast tissue. , 1986, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[15]  Toshiji Kobayashi Clinical Ultrasound of the Breast , 1978, Springer US.

[16]  J. J. Gisvold,et al.  Ultrasound transmission computed tomography of the breast. , 1984, Radiology.

[17]  L. J. Busse,et al.  Response characteristics of a finite aperture, phase insensitive ultrasonic receiver based upon the acoustoelectric effect , 1981 .

[18]  J. Haybittle,et al.  Curability of breast cancer. , 1991, British medical bulletin.

[19]  J. Jensen,et al.  Apparatus for ultrasound tissue characterization of excised specimens. , 1991, Ultrasonic imaging.

[20]  A. P. Harper,et al.  Ultrasound breast imaging-the method of choice for examining the young patient. , 1981, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[21]  R C Chivers,et al.  Ultrasonic velocity and attenuation in mammalian tissues. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.