论文信息 - An approach to ranking and selection for multiple performance measures

An approach to ranking and selection for multiple performance measures

We develop a ranking and selection procedure for making multiple comparisons of systems that have multiple performance measures. The procedure combines multiple attribute utility theory with ranking and selection to select the best configuration from a set of K configurations using the indifference zone approach. We demonstrate our procedure on a simulation model of a large project that has six performance measures.

Douglas J. Morrice | Peter W. Mullarkey | John C. Butler

[1] Ralph L. Keeney,et al. Siting energy facilities , 1980 .

[2] Douglas J. Morrice,et al. Simulation of a signal quality survey , 1997, WSC '97.

[3] H. Raiffa,et al. Decisions with Multiple Objectives , 1993 .

[4] Ralph L. Keeney,et al. Managing Nuclear Waste from Power Plants , 1994 .

[5] A. Tamhane. Design and Analysis of Experiments for Statistical Selection, Screening, and Multiple Comparisons , 1995 .

[6] C. C. Waid,et al. An Experimental Comparison of Different Approaches to Determining Weights in Additive Utility Models , 1982 .

[7] Thomas L. Saaty. What is the analytic hierarchy process , 1988 .

[8] Ralph L. Keeney,et al. Eliciting probabilities from experts in complex technical problems , 1991 .

[9] Barry L. Nelson,et al. Methods for selecting the best system , 1991, WSC '91.

[10] James S. Dyer,et al. The multiattribute evaluation of program-planning contractors , 1982 .

[11] Y. Rinott. On two-stage selection procedures and related probability-inequalities , 1978 .

[12] Barry L. Nelson,et al. Methods for selecting the best system (for simulation) , 1991, 1991 Winter Simulation Conference Proceedings..